Here's an idea for Voxengo... How about making a mastering rack VST? A placeholder for your mastering plugins allowing you to put them into series in predefined configurations.
The benefits? First of all, this could allow a 64bit signal path throughout the rack. No conversion to 32bit between each plugin. Secondly, a single preset can recall the placement and settings for multiple plugins making it easier reuse or create templates and so on.
Cheers
Voxengo mastering rack?
-
- KVRist
- 415 posts since 8 Dec, 2003 from NYC (born & raised in Philly)
might be a cool idea. but you might run into problems with host apps properly saving plugin settings within the rack plugin.
also FWIW, the round-off error from truncating between 2-3 plugins is negligable. 64bit float is most useful for feedback paths, used in filters, etc.
== chunk
also FWIW, the round-off error from truncating between 2-3 plugins is negligable. 64bit float is most useful for feedback paths, used in filters, etc.
== chunk
-
- KVRAF
- 4030 posts since 7 Sep, 2002
Evan, this idea has been expressed here and on the Voxengo forum several times already. Indeed, this does sound like a good idea, but it does not fit my plans because good/stable VST host is a pretty hard thing to create while we already have many hosts with such 'modular' functionality. You may try EnergyXT, for example.
32-bit 'inter plug-in' resolution is hardly a problem in my opinion.
32-bit 'inter plug-in' resolution is hardly a problem in my opinion.
