KVR Audio

lhama · Post by **lhama** » Tue Mar 29, 2005 7:50 pm

http://www.moogmusic.com/detail.php?main_product_id=166

dystonia_ek · Post by **dystonia_ek** » Tue Mar 29, 2005 7:58 pm

Does it alias?

shamann · Post by **shamann** » Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:07 pm

How does it compare to Anechoic Chamber? Will digital suffice or do I really need that extra analogue flavour for my silence?

TotcProductions · Post by **TotcProductions** » Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:27 pm

shamann wrote:How does it compare to Anechoic Chamber? Will digital suffice or do I really need that extra analogue flavour for my silence?

I don't think digital silence will EVER compare to analog silence.

peace!

shamann · Post by **shamann** » Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:30 pm

TotcProductions wrote:I don't think digital silence will EVER compare to analog silence.

But analog silence won't remember its parameter settings. How will I get the same silence every time?

Bassballjg · Post by **Bassballjg** » Tue Mar 29, 2005 9:01 pm

Note the model number, price and Friday's date. The other clue is the adjective for the unit's sound that is attributed to Bob.

sangha · Post by **sangha** » Tue Mar 29, 2005 9:27 pm

shamann wrote:
TotcProductions wrote:I don't think digital silence will EVER compare to analog silence.
But analog silence won't remember its parameter settings. How will I get the same silence every time?

http://www.tcelectronic.com/Assimilator

LBN · Post by **LBN** » Tue Mar 29, 2005 9:33 pm

TotcProductions wrote:
shamann wrote:How does it compare to Anechoic Chamber? Will digital suffice or do I really need that extra analogue flavour for my silence?
I don't think digital silence will EVER compare to analog silence.

peace!

You obviously haven't heard 4x oversampled silence at 32/192. The extra headroom makes a HUUUUGE difference.

Jafo · Post by **Jafo** » Tue Mar 29, 2005 9:37 pm

Ah, the perfect effect for my imaginary Virus...

3*s · Post by **3*s** » Tue Mar 29, 2005 9:40 pm

Digital silence is crap. It can't compare to the warmth and power of real analog silence.

jtxx000 · Post by **jtxx000** » Tue Mar 29, 2005 9:41 pm

what about VA silence? is emulated silence as good as the real thing?

3*s · Post by **3*s** » Tue Mar 29, 2005 9:45 pm

I dunno. All I know is all the pros use analog silence.

Jafo · Post by **Jafo** » Tue Mar 29, 2005 9:49 pm

3*s wrote:I dunno. All I know is all the pros use analog silence.

Yeah, but just wait until 128/384!

Err, wait, that's actually kinda sensible...

Meffy · Post by **Meffy** » Tue Mar 29, 2005 9:56 pm

*AHEM*

http://www.kvraudio.com/forum/viewtopic ... c&start=30

I expect royalties for use of that joke.

ezeeboogie · Post by **ezeeboogie** » Wed Mar 30, 2005 12:37 am

Anyway silence is experienced not heard. That why you can have eerie silences, confused silences, embarrased silences, etc. How will a plugin be able to recreate these? Neither analog nor digital are a patch on experiencing silence for real.

Live silence is the ONLY way.

new moogerfooger?