some simple T2 questions, please answer

[zeoy]

but to be able to do that you would have to have each track frozen to a seperate 32/64 bit file... personally i like rendering tracks better than freezing anyways.

That's what I am currently doing jtx, but I think freezing with the possibility of unfreezing is more elegant solution ( and yeah I know I can add instead of replace rendered tracks mute the original, disable the fx/synths in the original to save cpu and all that)

what i do right now is render and then copy the orginal to a different edit in the same project so i have a backup.

Yeah that works too, but I think you would agree about the elegance of freeze (better workflow I mean)

[ModuLR]

Sorry, you were all were waiting for me to reply? My bad. There have been no changes to Pitch Shift/Time Stretch for version 2.0. Sorry, we couldn't do everything for this release and there were many things, including new PS and TS algorithms, that didn't make it.
Ben

This ist just to answer ttoz's "how do you know?" question.

[jtxx000]

but to be able to do that you would have to have each track frozen to a seperate 32/64 bit file... personally i like rendering tracks better than freezing anyways.

That's what I am currently doing jtx, but I think freezing with the possibility of unfreezing is more elegant solution ( and yeah I know I can add instead of replace rendered tracks mute the original, disable the fx/synths in the original to save cpu and all that)

what i do right now is render and then copy the orginal to a different edit in the same project so i have a backup.

Yeah that works too, but I think you would agree about the elegance of freeze (better workflow I mean)

yup... but i would be ok with simply an easier way to copy tracks from edit to edit. im thinking right click a track and there's a menu option for copy to which then has a sub menu that lets you pick which track to copy to. having the ability to open more than one edit at once would work too.

[zeoy]

Can't disagree. I am off now, bye.

[ObsoleteAcc99]

[DELETED]

[IIRs]

[quote="ttoz
--no: its already perfect.

Yes plat, but if we could mute, solo, alter volume in freezed tracks it would be very helpful. A tractionhead here

but didn;t you know? there';s RENDER! DOH

Render? what's that. I thougt YOU were asking for better freeze

i was having a dig at platinum ears

You'll have to dig deeper than that!

Render does exactly what you want, I don't understand this obsession with calling it freeze.. personally I render and add, and mute the original. Every so often I delete muted tracks that I havent needed for a while, and save the edit with a later version number. This keeps my edits tidy, but I still have the option to open an earlier edit and re-render if I really have to.. I don't really understand why anyone would have a problem working like this, and its certainly not worth sacrificing the disk activity reduction that the current freeze provides (especially for lap-top users).

IM(H?)O of course..

[braj]

[quote="ttoz
--no: its already perfect.

Yes plat, but if we could mute, solo, alter volume in freezed tracks it would be very helpful. A tractionhead here

but didn;t you know? there';s RENDER! DOH

Render? what's that. I thougt YOU were asking for better freeze

i was having a dig at platinum ears

You'll have to dig deeper than that!

Render does exactly what you want, I don't understand this obsession with calling it freeze.. personally I render and add, and mute the original. Every so often I delete muted tracks that I havent needed for a while, and save the edit with a later version number. This keeps my edits tidy, but I still have the option to open an earlier edit and re-render if I really have to.. I don't really understand why anyone would have a problem working like this, and its certainly not worth sacrificing the disk activity reduction that the current freeze provides (especially for lap-top users).

IM(H?)O of course..

I totally agree with this. I have been using Logic's freeze a lot lately and I really wish it had the options T has. You can't even render a track like in Tracktion! That's a major bummer. And in Live to render you have to set everything up manually and record in real time. That's useful but archaic. Tracktion's freeze/render are near perfect IMO. An option to have each track saved individually would be nice, but as it stands you can essentially do that anyway via render then mute.

I really wish T had Acid-like support, nothing could touch it if that were the case IMO. I'll probably get T3 or whatever when that happens. Hopefully T doesn't reach a Cubase/Logic like pricepoint when that happens.

[Lunch Money]

[quote="brajI really wish T had Acid-like support, nothing could touch it if that were the case IMO. I'll probably get T3 or whatever when that happens. Hopefully T doesn't reach a Cubase/Logic like pricepoint when that happens.[/quote]

Now that the MIDI has been revised and looped audio recording added, this is the only thing stopping it from being the perfect sequencer for me.

There ARE other functions that can be found in Audio editors that I'd like, too, but I guess I can resign myself to just using an audio editor for those instead of expecting my budget-friendly sequencer to do it ALLllll....

(ie. noise removal)

Greg