T2 and rack latency

[IIRs]

Chorus and delay don't tend to be as hungry as reverb: I would suggest cutting back to just the one reverb send, and inserting everything else where needed..

[valley]

Reverb sounds better when applied globally.

Not always the case: even just different amounts of pre-delay on different tracks can help create more front to back depth..

true, but then I'd normally do that at the instrument level.

Either way, I should have said: "Reverb generally sounds better when applied globally."

[Mr. Tingle]

this is all just nonsense. fix the bug! racks should not be dependent on the latency of your sound card, full stop!

[P.T.]

The example set-up I posted on the first page has nothing to do with live playing.

It happens with a rendered edit, using no effects.

[Pädy]

Chorus and delay don't tend to be as hungry as reverb: I would suggest cutting back to just the one reverb send, and inserting everything else where needed..

Sure, given the right situations that's possible. But it's a workaround for something where I should not be obliged to do a workaround in the first place.
Anyway, I know it's in the feature request/bug report list - so there's hope.

Cheers, Pädy

[valley]

this is all just nonsense. fix the bug!

It's not a bug, it's a feature.

[valley]

Sure, given the right situations that's possible. But it's a workaround for something where I should not be obliged to do a workaround in the first place.

I always felt that putting delay and chorus as send effects was a work-around, personally.

I'd far rather have specific delay and chorus settings for each sound. It's just that back in the day, 16 stereo delay units would have been an unrealistic proposition. Whereas today 16 tracks of delay barely dents my CPU.

Racks do need to lose the latency though.

[Solarfall]

scary is that there was no response to this topic from Beno yet...