does someone know a good packer especially for making WAV-files smaller? i´m searching for something like this for ages now but cant find anything useful
crunching/packing WAV-files?
- KVRAF
- 3944 posts since 7 May, 2004 from behind his workbench
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 3944 posts since 7 May, 2004 from behind his workbench
-
- KVRAF
- 3066 posts since 31 May, 2002 from My chair
RAR works fairly well.
Monkey's Audio is my preferred lossless compressor for wavs.
- m
Monkey's Audio is my preferred lossless compressor for wavs.
- m
Markleford's band, The James Rocket: http://www.TheJamesRocket.com/
Markleford's tracks: http://www.markleford.com/music/
Markleford's free MFX, DXi2, DR-008 modules: http://www.TenCrazy.com/
Markleford's tracks: http://www.markleford.com/music/
Markleford's free MFX, DXi2, DR-008 modules: http://www.TenCrazy.com/
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 3944 posts since 7 May, 2004 from behind his workbench
-
- KVRAF
- 2285 posts since 20 Dec, 2002 from The Benighted States of Trumpistan
Howdy. Depends on what precisely you mean, and your purposes. You can encode to MP3, OGG, or, gods help us, WMA, with some loss of quality (allegedly negligible). You can compress for archival purposes with RAR, ZIP, GZIP, BZIP2, or any similar compression app, but you'll have to decompress before use. Tracktion's lossless compression works nicely, giving about a 2:1 ratio -- which, perhaps not coincidentally, is precisely the ratio found in Shorten (also lossless). Or perhaps you could dither to a WAV with a smaller sampling rate or fewer bits (not recommended). A high bitrate OGG is probably your best bet.
Wait... loot _then_ burn? D'oh!
- KVRAF
- 25031 posts since 12 Jul, 2003 from West Caprazumia
Monkey's audio is the best currently... 
- KVRAF
- 25031 posts since 12 Jul, 2003 from West Caprazumia
Tracktion uses FlacJafo wrote: Tracktion's lossless compression works nicely, giving about a 2:1 ratio -- which, perhaps not coincidentally, is precisely the ratio found in Shorten (also lossless).
Last edited by jens on Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- KVRAF
- 1884 posts since 9 Feb, 2004 from Rochester, MN
-
- KVRAF
- 1884 posts since 9 Feb, 2004 from Rochester, MN
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 3944 posts since 7 May, 2004 from behind his workbench
thanks for all you responses! 
well i just want to use it for distribution on web. something else like rar or zip that is better on compressing waveforms to keep download-size as low as possible...
(i´m working on a new kind of drum-sampler/sequencer with dozens of waveforms....that´s why i´ve asked
)
well i just want to use it for distribution on web. something else like rar or zip that is better on compressing waveforms to keep download-size as low as possible...
(i´m working on a new kind of drum-sampler/sequencer with dozens of waveforms....that´s why i´ve asked
- KVRAF
- 25031 posts since 12 Jul, 2003 from West Caprazumia
then I'd still go for Flac or Monkey's audio - both are free and you could like to a site where people can download the decoder....sonicfire wrote:thanks for all you responses!
well i just want to use it for distribution on web. something else like rar or zip that is better on compressing waveforms to keep download-size as low as possible...
(i´m working on a new kind of drum-sampler/sequencer with dozens of waveforms....that´s why i´ve asked)
-
- KVRAF
- 1884 posts since 9 Feb, 2004 from Rochester, MN
- KVRAF
- 25031 posts since 12 Jul, 2003 from West Caprazumia
besides .rar has still a bad compression-ratio for audio, even if it is better than .zip (actually .zip is bullshit for everything...)Warmonger wrote:Zip has pretty useless wave compression. RAR is better, but then you'll have to link to WinRAR since many people still don't know what to do with a RAR file.
-
- KVRAF
- 2285 posts since 20 Dec, 2002 from The Benighted States of Trumpistan
I agree with all of that -- modulo my personal preference for OGG -- but I still think the best way to learn is to try literally everything. Besides, which method gives the best results for a specific files is not necessarily predictable; I've had files the ZIP did a better job with than bzip2 (even with "--best"!).My spies inform me that Warmonger wrote:Zip has pretty useless wave compression. RAR is better, but then you'll have to link to WinRAR since many people still don't know what to do with a RAR file. I'd put everything up using FLAC, and then link to dBpowerAMP, a free audio format converter.
Anyway, I'll give FLAC a try. Thanks for the tip.
Wait... loot _then_ burn? D'oh!


