crunching/packing WAV-files?

Sampler and Sampling discussion (techniques, tips and tricks, etc.)
RELATED
PRODUCTS

Post

hi folks!

does someone know a good packer especially for making WAV-files smaller? i´m searching for something like this for ages now but cant find anything useful :help:
Image

Post

no one? :x :( :wink:
Image

Post

RAR works fairly well.

Monkey's Audio is my preferred lossless compressor for wavs.

- m
Markleford's band, The James Rocket: http://www.TheJamesRocket.com/
Markleford's tracks: http://www.markleford.com/music/
Markleford's free MFX, DXi2, DR-008 modules: http://www.TenCrazy.com/

Post

monkey´s audio? sounds interesting .... will google after it ;)
Image

Post

Howdy. Depends on what precisely you mean, and your purposes. You can encode to MP3, OGG, or, gods help us, WMA, with some loss of quality (allegedly negligible). You can compress for archival purposes with RAR, ZIP, GZIP, BZIP2, or any similar compression app, but you'll have to decompress before use. Tracktion's lossless compression works nicely, giving about a 2:1 ratio -- which, perhaps not coincidentally, is precisely the ratio found in Shorten (also lossless). Or perhaps you could dither to a WAV with a smaller sampling rate or fewer bits (not recommended). A high bitrate OGG is probably your best bet.
Wait... loot _then_ burn? D'oh!

Post

monkey's audio, flac and shorten are the most common.
here's a comparison of a whole bunch of codecs.
Image

Post

Monkey's audio is the best currently... :-D

Post

Jafo wrote: Tracktion's lossless compression works nicely, giving about a 2:1 ratio -- which, perhaps not coincidentally, is precisely the ratio found in Shorten (also lossless).
Tracktion uses Flac ;-)
Last edited by jens on Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Post

I recommend FLAC if compatibility is at all a concern. More players/programs support it with no need for plugins than any other lossless format I've seen. That said, I use Monkey's Audio for my own CD backups.
Image

Post

I've got a particular song that went from 49 MB to 16 MB after compression :shock:

Meanwhile, all the other songs on the CD were within 3% of a 2:1 compression ratio.
Image

Post

thanks for all you responses! :)
well i just want to use it for distribution on web. something else like rar or zip that is better on compressing waveforms to keep download-size as low as possible...

(i´m working on a new kind of drum-sampler/sequencer with dozens of waveforms....that´s why i´ve asked :))
Image

Post

sonicfire wrote:thanks for all you responses! :)
well i just want to use it for distribution on web. something else like rar or zip that is better on compressing waveforms to keep download-size as low as possible...

(i´m working on a new kind of drum-sampler/sequencer with dozens of waveforms....that´s why i´ve asked :))
then I'd still go for Flac or Monkey's audio - both are free and you could like to a site where people can download the decoder.... :)

Post

Zip has pretty useless wave compression. RAR is better, but then you'll have to link to WinRAR since many people still don't know what to do with a RAR file. I'd put everything up using FLAC, and then link to dBpowerAMP, a free audio format converter.
Image

Post

Warmonger wrote:Zip has pretty useless wave compression. RAR is better, but then you'll have to link to WinRAR since many people still don't know what to do with a RAR file.
besides .rar has still a bad compression-ratio for audio, even if it is better than .zip (actually .zip is bullshit for everything...)

Post

My spies inform me that Warmonger wrote:Zip has pretty useless wave compression. RAR is better, but then you'll have to link to WinRAR since many people still don't know what to do with a RAR file. I'd put everything up using FLAC, and then link to dBpowerAMP, a free audio format converter.
I agree with all of that -- modulo my personal preference for OGG -- but I still think the best way to learn is to try literally everything. Besides, which method gives the best results for a specific files is not necessarily predictable; I've had files the ZIP did a better job with than bzip2 (even with "--best"!).

Anyway, I'll give FLAC a try. Thanks for the tip.
Wait... loot _then_ burn? D'oh!

Post Reply

Return to “Samplers, Sampling & Sample Libraries”