The argument that started in vurts song thread thread

Anything about MUSIC but doesn't fit into the forums above.
Post Reply New Topic
RELATED
PRODUCTS

Post

like it or dont like it. if you like i cheer for it, if you dont like it move on.
music isnt to argue, me thinks. what is to argue is how people in positions "force" societies to like music ..
but music itself is just sound the ears react to.

my 1 million millicents

putte

Post

Jens wrote: I always care very much about it and put much work into getting it right but I don't stop there... for me this would be like designing a beautyful car but leaving out the engine...

and I think you can find a lot of cars without engines in the cafe...
I couldn't have put it better myself. 8)
Image

Post

scuzzphut wrote:so - is vurt's music any good, then ?
vurt ROCKS!!!

Post

herodotus wrote:Actually, authorial identity is as old as literature.
I don't disagree with you, but I said dominant concern. Authorship is an old concept, but the concern over the authenticity of authorship is relatively new.

Post

I don't know if "Rocks" is the word I would have chosen, herodotus :-)

Post

putte wrote:but music itself is just sound the ears react to.



putte
So true. So very true.

Post

shamann wrote:
Jens wrote:I find it a bit amusing that some of you seem to assume that people like e.g. me who make pop care less about sound & the ambience of their tracks than e.g. Vurt...
Who said that exactly? And your later statement suggests that those who do what vurt does ignore the structure and method of making music.
I could be wrong of course because it's hard to interprete whart you exactly meant but I thought it was you:
"Let's try to hear old sound in a new way." It's as much about listening closer, as much about sound in its physical state, as it is about its humanized form and calculation.

Maybe you could paraphrase this? :hihi:

Post

if someone tells me that he/she likes this song so so much, while it´s a song i personally think bad about .. well, i can only congratulate that that song makes that person cheer. thats what music should do.

putte

Post

Jens wrote:and I think you can find a lot of cars without engines in the cafe...
hey ... this could be a whole new direction for me :hihi:
5 twelve

Post

and b.t.w.: I don't care about the 'structure and Method of making music'. For me it's about 'form and substance'. You can listen to Bach's fugue on my old Nokia and it's still Bach's fugue. That's the substance of it. When it is played and conducted by Harnoncourt and his orchestra there is added form to the substance. Both combined make up for great music.




edit: typo
Last edited by jens on Wed Mar 16, 2005 10:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Post

scuzzphut wrote:I don't know if "Rocks" is the word I would have chosen, herodotus :-)
I know..."oozes" is what first came to mind but "vurt OOZES" just lacks the punch of "vurt ROCKS"

Lets face it, the vocabulary we have for discussing music is just plain dated. Or perhaps I just suck at describing music. :lol:

Post

maybe we should take a leaf from the Eskimo's book and have 29 words for "snow"

but

with music instead

sort of thing.......... :?

Post

Jens wrote:and I think you can find a lot of cars without engines in the cafe...
Care to name a few?

:D

Post

Sicklecell666 wrote:
Jens wrote:and I think you can find a lot of cars without engines in the cafe...
Care to name a few?
dj disco
dj beat
dj topcool
dj breakbeat
dj tittielicker
dj cool guy

to mention a few .. :hihi: .. but hey, the love what they do .. so what?

putte
Last edited by putte on Wed Mar 16, 2005 10:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Post

Sicklecell666 wrote:
Jens wrote:and I think you can find a lot of cars without engines in the cafe...
Care to name a few?

:D
yes, indeed - I care to not name them ! ;-)

Post Reply

Return to “Everything Else (Music related)”