external hard drives
-
- KVRAF
- 2009 posts since 9 Apr, 2003 from Cornwall, UK
- KVRAF
- 2750 posts since 2 Feb, 2005 from Raincoast of Grayland
It could be a problem with large track counts or DFD sample playback. But why take the chance? Why not get a 7200rpm 8meg cache USB2 drive? Unless....
-
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 2009 posts since 9 Apr, 2003 from Cornwall, UK
- KVRAF
- 2750 posts since 2 Feb, 2005 from Raincoast of Grayland
Watch it! You don't want to get your hardware setup so convenient that it never distracts from making music. Oh, wait, they have software to do that now.
Still you might want to consult tomshardware.com to view the performance of these drives. You can get 7200rpm laptop drives...I think a 4200rpm drive is just so last century.
Still you might want to consult tomshardware.com to view the performance of these drives. You can get 7200rpm laptop drives...I think a 4200rpm drive is just so last century.
- KVRAF
- 9096 posts since 5 Feb, 2004
I don't know much about the busses between the drive and the lappy, but I've heard that using an external via FW or USB2 was possibly slower than the drives can actually read/write at if they were internal IDE, so you lose performance by going external. Again, don't know how true that is.
If you have requests for Korg VST features or changes, they are listening at https://support.korguser.net/hc/en-us/requests/new
-
- KVRist
- 113 posts since 6 Jan, 2005
Here's a SOS article about USB vs FW drives.
Sustained read throughput is highly dependent on raw drive performance, and less so on interface transfer rate. Things like larger cache and faster spindle tend to give better performance. FW is slightly faster than USB 2, due to lower comm protocol overhead.
More info than you needed:
Wikipedia article on IEEE 1394/FireWire
Wikipedia article on USB
Wikipedia article on ATA
Wikipedia article on SATA
Sustained read throughput is highly dependent on raw drive performance, and less so on interface transfer rate. Things like larger cache and faster spindle tend to give better performance. FW is slightly faster than USB 2, due to lower comm protocol overhead.
Code: Select all
transfer rate MBytes/s
USB2 480 MBits/s ~20-30
FW 400 MBits/s ~20-30+
ATA-133 133 Mbytes/s ~40-60
SATA-1 150 Mbytes/s ~50-70?
SATA-2 300 Mbytes/s ~120-140?
SATA-3 600 Mbytes/s ~way faster than you need for audio.
Wikipedia article on IEEE 1394/FireWire
Wikipedia article on USB
Wikipedia article on ATA
Wikipedia article on SATA
-
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 2009 posts since 9 Apr, 2003 from Cornwall, UK
-
- KVRist
- 50 posts since 22 Feb, 2005
Just taken delivery of a nice Freecom 7200rpm 250gb, 8mb cache, USB 2 drive for my expanding projects and it's the biz 
Came with a free 64mb memory stick too, which was nice.
Only £120 GBP on eBuyer.
Well recommended! ___\o/___
Came with a free 64mb memory stick too, which was nice.
Only £120 GBP on eBuyer.
Well recommended! ___\o/___

