erm ... no it shouldnt ...topaz wrote:that should read
"but i think Jazz is crap you know ??"
![]()
pHz wrote:yeah ... but jazz IS crap you know ??? ...
... nuff said ...
slainterob
slainte
erm ... no it shouldnt ...topaz wrote:that should read
"but i think Jazz is crap you know ??"
![]()
pHz wrote:yeah ... but jazz IS crap you know ??? ...
... nuff said ...
slainterob
pHz wrote:[jazz]neeyah !!! look at ne ... i know more scales and weird time signatures than you !!! [/jazz]
slainterob
no you donttopaz wrote:I know how to cut and paste better than you'
ner![]()
![]()
pHz wrote:no you donttopaz wrote:I know how to cut and paste better than you'
ner![]()
![]()
slainterob
...topaz wrote:I do I studied it, OK.
I learnt too much tho, now I cut more than paste
![]()
![]()
havent heard that ... but theres a parallel in my area of (vague) expertise ... to paraphrase picasso ... it takes a lifetime of being a trained artist to learn how to draw like a child ...herodotus wrote:Someone (was it Fripp?) once said that the point was to use technique to try to recapture innocence.
I wouldn't necessarily say it was a bad thing per se. In reality it tends to produce a whole army of widdly graham music school clones playing zx spectrum loading noise steve vai solos ad infinitum (at least on the geetar, point taken..).herodotus wrote:You know, I am really in the minority on this board because I actually like reading music theory. Hell I have even written some.
I think that it is possible to think too much, but I do not think that is what most peoples problem is. I think that people are simply too impatient sometimes, expecting music to happen more quickly than it wants to happen.
Someone (was it Fripp?) once said that the point was to use technique to try to recapture innocence.
I have no idea what that means, but I do think that learning about theory, (whether it be the theory of counterpoint or the theory of granular synthesis) is always a good thing. But it's like losing weight or gaining muscle: if you expect overnight results, you will probably be disappointed.
So this principle of ignorance being superior to knowledge, did it guide you into your chosen career?pHz wrote:if you think jazz is great then you need to start forgetting some theory before your pure creativity shrivels up ... but then make sure that once your body learns from that lack of theory that you let your head remember to forget it all so you can feel the music again ...
slainterob
Yes, but when your bike stops working, what then???donkey tugger wrote:I wouldn't necessarily say it was a bad thing per se. In reality it tends to produce a whole army of widdly graham music school clones playing zx spectrum loading noise steve vai solos as infinitum (at least on the geetar, point taken..).herodotus wrote:You know, I am really in the minority on this board because I actually like reading music theory. Hell I have even written some.
I think that it is possible to think too much, but I do not think that is what most peoples problem is. I think that people are simply too impatient sometimes, expecting music to happen more quickly than it wants to happen.
Someone (was it Fripp?) once said that the point was to use technique to try to recapture innocence.
I have no idea what that means, but I do think that learning about theory, (whether it be the theory of counterpoint or the theory of granular synthesis) is always a good thing. But it's like losing weight or gaining muscle: if you expect overnight results, you will probably be disappointed.
Stuff is generally much more fun without rules though. Make up yer own, we wanna be free, and we wanna ride our bikes.
Submit: News, Plugins, Hosts & Apps | Advertise @ KVR | Developer Account | About KVR / Contact Us | Privacy Statement
© KVR Audio, Inc. 2000-2026