Ok..gone too far but you've put your finger on it..convenience, not quality. Thats what people are after so why bother with all the gear?pHz wrote:you dont think CDs are much better that .mp3 ???
... theyre not perfect but still ... ?!?
slainterob
What's the point?!
-
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 601 posts since 5 Mar, 2005 from A bordello in Moscow
-
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 601 posts since 5 Mar, 2005 from A bordello in Moscow
Dude, the thread about pots somewhere else!Meffy wrote:"The Point" was a 1979 animated movie about non-conformity... er, I mean about a little boy, Oblio, and his dog, Arrow. Oblio is the only round-headed person in a land where everyone has a pointed head. So naturally he's exiled. He travels and becomes hip to stuff and all that.
Harry Nilsson did a catchy little number concerning the hero and his pet, and possibly other songs; I can't remember. Ringo Starr narrated. (There's some history about that but I'll stop here.)
Anyway: that's What's The Point.
-
- Banned
- 12367 posts since 30 Apr, 2002 from i might peeramid
mebbe the flaw in your thought is attempting to vector map the lot with one sweeping generalisation.. "that's what people want.." i'll show you stinky steven on the end of the street, all he wants is to wipe boogers on your face.proletkult wrote:
Ok..gone too far but you've put your finger on it..convenience, not quality. Thats what people are after so why bother with all the gear?
"..so that's what people are after eh."
you come and go, you come and go. amitabha neither a follower nor a leader be tagore "where roads are made i lose my way" where there is certainty, consideration is absent.
-
- KVRAF
- 2017 posts since 21 Mar, 2002 from Hutchinson, Kansas
Who says that's what everybody wants? I know quite a few folks with expensive sound systems who take great joy in wallowing in every nuance and squeek in a recording. I want them to like my records. I know lots of folks whose exposure to music is only through downloadable MP3s. I want them to like my stuff, as well. I work very hard to ensure that my mixes sound good no matter what your listening preference. If you want to compromise your audio by reducing it to the lowest common denominator, that's your business. I, for one, enjoy an excellent recording, and am often put off by a bad one, though an excellent recording of shit is still shit, and a bad recording of a brilliant composition is still brilliant.
-
- KVRer
- 17 posts since 13 Mar, 2005
128k mp3 is crap. 192k and above is more than adequet, and sounds like a cd to me. and the benifits of higher than 16bit 44k sound are neglible.
and any serious music downloader is gettin high quality mp3s nowadays
and any serious music downloader is gettin high quality mp3s nowadays
-
- KVRian
- 901 posts since 1 Dec, 2003
Scot Solida wrote:Who says that's what everybody wants? I know quite a few folks with expensive sound systems who take great joy in wallowing in every nuance and squeek in a recording. I want them to like my records. I know lots of folks whose exposure to music is only through downloadable MP3s. I want them to like my stuff, as well. I work very hard to ensure that my mixes sound good no matter what your listening preference. If you want to compromise your audio by reducing it to the lowest common denominator, that's your business. I, for one, enjoy an excellent recording, and am often put off by a bad one, though an excellent recording of shit is still shit, and a bad recording of a brilliant composition is still brilliant.

-
LIMITAPROACHINGINFINITY LIMITAPROACHINGINFINITY https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=47871
- KVRAF
- 1850 posts since 13 Nov, 2004
Meffy wrote:"The Point" was a 1979 animated movie about non-conformity... er, I mean about a little boy, Oblio, and his dog, Arrow. Oblio is the only round-headed person in a land where everyone has a pointed head. So naturally he's exiled. He travels and becomes hip to stuff and all that.
Harry Nilsson did a catchy little number concerning the hero and his pet, and possibly other songs; I can't remember. Ringo Starr narrated. (There's some history about that but I'll stop here.)
Anyway: that's What's The Point.
So this is about circumcision?
The following statement is true.
The previous statement is false.
The previous statement is false.
-
- KVRist
- 133 posts since 22 Apr, 2004
i think it's funny when something so crap gets so popular and it annoys people who don't like that crapproletkult wrote: ... the issue that the Mp3 is so popular and so CRAP!
-
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 601 posts since 5 Mar, 2005 from A bordello in Moscow
I don't know many people who can afford gear like that and I don't think they make up the majority(but thank God for them). I DO NOT WANT TO REDUCE MY WORK TO THE LOWEST COMMON DENOMINATOR! Which is why I'm complaining that there's very little going on to promote better formats.Scot Solida wrote:Who says that's what everybody wants? I know quite a few folks with expensive sound systems who take great joy in wallowing in every nuance and squeek in a recording. I want them to like my records. I know lots of folks whose exposure to music is only through downloadable MP3s. I want them to like my stuff, as well. I work very hard to ensure that my mixes sound good no matter what your listening preference. If you want to compromise your audio by reducing it to the lowest common denominator, that's your business.
That would have gone without saying.Scot Solida wrote: I, for one, enjoy an excellent recording, and am often put off by a bad one, though an excellent recording of shit is still shit, and a bad recording of a brilliant composition is still brilliant.
-
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 601 posts since 5 Mar, 2005 from A bordello in Moscow
So how many people are downloading 192k?phunktion wrote:128k mp3 is crap. 192k and above is more than adequet, and sounds like a cd to me. and the benifits of higher than 16bit 44k sound are neglible.
and any serious music downloader is gettin high quality mp3s nowadays
-
- KVRAF
- 1884 posts since 9 Feb, 2004 from Rochester, MN

