You can automate filter sweeps etc. from within live - i was doing it the other day - it's midi clip automation, cc values - same for tracktion etc. IMO live does it better as it properly names the values one is automating, rather than just giving generic cc values - or am I barking up the wrong tree here?headquest wrote:[
But no, because if you wish to automate the synth's parameters (e.g. to do a filter weep) then this has to be done within Reason's sequencer.
This is not a limitation of Live - it is a limitation of the Rewire protocol, and is the same whichever host you choose to use Reason within.
Have Live 4 made you leave OR run back to Live 3?
-
- KVRAF
- 3617 posts since 26 Sep, 2003 from Bradford - The Armpit of Britain
-
- KVRAF
- 7489 posts since 6 Jul, 2004
Yes, that's right. I had "teething" problems with L4 which were sorted in 4.1.1.
I take your point, LM, because I believe that a minority of users who were using Live 4 "on stage" reverted to L3 for a couple of weeks while the initial bugs were squished. But that was quite a while ago now, in Ableton development terms!
I take your point, LM, because I believe that a minority of users who were using Live 4 "on stage" reverted to L3 for a couple of weeks while the initial bugs were squished. But that was quite a while ago now, in Ableton development terms!
-
- KVRAF
- 7489 posts since 6 Jul, 2004
diverdee wrote: You can automate filter sweeps etc. from within live - i was doing it the other day -
Live is certainly the best Rewire host for Reason that I have found...it's midi clip automation, cc values - same for tracktion etc. IMO live does it better as it properly names the values one is automating, rather than just giving generic cc values - or am I barking up the wrong tree here?
-
- KVRAF
- 3617 posts since 26 Sep, 2003 from Bradford - The Armpit of Britain
I haven't got live in front of me (don't own it yet), but you just use the clip automation. As long as the midi channel in live is directed to the appropriate reason device (e.g. maelstom) when you bring up the list for automation values live will list all the automatable values e.g. filter cutoff, resonance etc.
tracktion does it also (has to be midi cc automation within clips, not the vst automation), but it does not report back the correct names - just generic cc values - so you have to refer to reasons midi implementation chart to cross reference which cc values automate particular functions.
tracktion does it also (has to be midi cc automation within clips, not the vst automation), but it does not report back the correct names - just generic cc values - so you have to refer to reasons midi implementation chart to cross reference which cc values automate particular functions.
-
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 1411 posts since 25 Sep, 2003 from The Dirty South, USA
v.4.1.1 to be exact.Lunch Money wrote:That's the question in its entirety. Some people are apparently not happy with Live 4. My understanding, though, was that most of the issues Live 4 users were having had to do with CPU consumption, which I gather was fixed in one of the first updates, no?
Greg
-
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 1411 posts since 25 Sep, 2003 from The Dirty South, USA
Ableton is what Sony should have been: improving their products!headquest wrote:Yes, that's right. I had "teething" problems with L4 which were sorted in 4.1.1.
I take your point, LM, because I believe that a minority of users who were using Live 4 "on stage" reverted to L3 for a couple of weeks while the initial bugs were squished. But that was quite a while ago now, in Ableton development terms!
Only question now is what else can be added on for a possible Live 5?
-
- KVRAF
- 1682 posts since 13 Oct, 2003 from Oulu, Finland
I know the answerTVD wrote:Ableton is what Sony should have been: improving their products!headquest wrote:Yes, that's right. I had "teething" problems with L4 which were sorted in 4.1.1.
I take your point, LM, because I believe that a minority of users who were using Live 4 "on stage" reverted to L3 for a couple of weeks while the initial bugs were squished. But that was quite a while ago now, in Ableton development terms!
Only question now is what else can be added on for a possible Live 5?
Misspellers of the world, unit!
https://soundcloud.com/aflecht
https://soundcloud.com/aflecht
-
- KVRAF
- 2058 posts since 23 Sep, 2004 from Canada
Or you whack your Maelstrom in a Combinator and assign the 4 knobs + 4 buttons + Pitch bend and Mod Wheel to various paramters and tweek all of those in the Clip properties in LIVEheadquest wrote:diverdee wrote: You can automate filter sweeps etc. from within live - i was doing it the other day -Perhaps I'm missing something here then? I know I can automate any VST or Live's native filter sweeps, but I've not found a way to automate (e.g. Maelstrom's inbuilt) filters from within Live's interface (or in Tracktion, or Cubase). Are you saying there is a way to do this?
Live is certainly the best Rewire host for Reason that I have found...it's midi clip automation, cc values - same for tracktion etc. IMO live does it better as it properly names the values one is automating, rather than just giving generic cc values - or am I barking up the wrong tree here?
EDIT - and yes you can do device automation for REV7000's and all sorts from within LIVE just so you know
-
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 1411 posts since 25 Sep, 2003 from The Dirty South, USA
Freeze alone would make Live 5 THE final upgrade.Kraku wrote:I know the answerTVD wrote:Ableton is what Sony should have been: improving their products!headquest wrote:Yes, that's right. I had "teething" problems with L4 which were sorted in 4.1.1.
I take your point, LM, because I believe that a minority of users who were using Live 4 "on stage" reverted to L3 for a couple of weeks while the initial bugs were squished. But that was quite a while ago now, in Ableton development terms!
Only question now is what else can be added on for a possible Live 5?I already said it once in this thread: PDC, track freeze and maybe some kind of modular environment (á la Tracktion's rack).
-
- KVRAF
- 1682 posts since 13 Oct, 2003 from Oulu, Finland
Oh... I know another one: multithreading! Now that dualcore/multicore cpu's (and multiprocessor setups) are becoming reality in home market, Live should be able to use all that power in the future.
Misspellers of the world, unit!
https://soundcloud.com/aflecht
https://soundcloud.com/aflecht
-
- KVRAF
- 7489 posts since 6 Jul, 2004
Aha!! Wow - thanks for the heads up on that. I've barely explored clip automation yet - it is in itself such a revolutionary concept when moving over to Live from other hosts, that its still on the learning list! (I've sent off for a copy of Live 4 Power book, which I've heard is really worth havingdiverdee wrote:I haven't got live in front of me (don't own it yet), but you just use the clip automation. As long as the midi channel in live is directed to the appropriate reason device (e.g. maelstom) when you bring up the list for automation values live will list all the automatable values e.g. filter cutoff, resonance etc.
tracktion does it also (has to be midi cc automation within clips, not the vst automation), but it does not report back the correct names - just generic cc values - so you have to refer to reasons midi implementation chart to cross reference which cc values automate particular functions.
Tracktion's method sounds WAY complicated to me - but then I admit I don't know my MIDI cc messages very well
Cheers again!
-
- KVRAF
- 7489 posts since 6 Jul, 2004
Regarding Live 5 feature, I would like to see:
PDC - I think that is quite important as a priority
Freeze - likewise
Arpeggiator
That's it really. Although I personally like the growing range of Ableton instruments, and it would be interesting to see if and how they add to that aspect of Live in the coming months.
Either way, Live seems to have the fastest development of any mainstreatm program with major updates coming in less than a year each time
so I doubt we'll have to wait long to find out, or get involved in a lengthy drawn out speculation game here 
PDC - I think that is quite important as a priority
Freeze - likewise
Arpeggiator
That's it really. Although I personally like the growing range of Ableton instruments, and it would be interesting to see if and how they add to that aspect of Live in the coming months.
Either way, Live seems to have the fastest development of any mainstreatm program with major updates coming in less than a year each time
-
- KVRAF
- 7489 posts since 6 Jul, 2004
Can you explain more? I know that Live has 5 MIDI effects of its own...Reqs wrote:Live needs the ability to use midi effects as well. THey wouldn't need a native arpeggiator if they would just implement this one feature.
Also, one other FR - 32-bit export.
-
- KVRAF
- 3617 posts since 26 Sep, 2003 from Bradford - The Armpit of Britain
reckon he means support for either: A) mfx, e.g. slicydrummer or B) vstis that output midi data.
either or both would be useful
either or both would be useful
