47 posts

How high of a priority should full delay compensation for multiple instances of delay introducing pluggins in racks be.

Most Important Feature addition, should be patched immediately.: 14; 28%

Very Important Feature addition, should make the next scheduled update: 12; 24%

Important Feature, but I don't need it so it can wait: 11; 22%

Important Feature, but I don't need it so it can wait: 11; 22%

Don't care because I don't need it.: 1; 2%

Don't care because I have no clue what it is or why this clown cares so much about it.: 1; 2%

: Total votes: 50

RELATED
PRODUCTS

Full Delay Compensation in racks for UAD Plugins and SIR 2005-05-20T09:37:41+00:00 I, like a lot of people, use the UAD-1 and SIR extensively. I use both on drums and in many cases will run a full drum mix to a separate channel (a bus in any other program) and eq it with a pultec and compress the hell out of it. This lets me get a fat compressed drum sound; but, I get to keep the transients of my uncompressed mix. I have heard people call it NYC compression. The fact that the racks don't let me do this because tracktion can't handle two instances of delay introducing plugins is asinine. I really really need full delay compensation in racks for multiple instances of delay introducing plugins such as SIR and UAD Pluggins. I know I am not the only person who uses this style of compression/eq on drums. I really want to use this software. I payed for the first version and will pay for the new one as soon as they get delay compensation taken care of across the racks. That being said, please don't respond to this telling me workarounds. I know all the possible ways to make everything delay equally. I am not interested in working around. I currently use Cubase SX and Samplitude and they compensate fine. I am just attracted to tracktion because of how uncluttered it is and how fast the lack of clutter allows me to work; however, when i have to add a bunch of extra racks and zero them out or add pluggins to introduce delay to tracks that means I have to keep track of all of that crap. If I have to keep track of it I get slowed down and/or make mistakes. I hate mixing and playing the "find the track that is out of phase" game or the "find out which track is delayed or which track isn't" game. I'm not interested in workarounds or people telling me that it isn't as much work as I make it out to be. I am interested in when Mackie thinks full delay compensation will be available in tracktion. Once that have that I will be interested in giving them more of my business and will likely be buying a hardware controller from them as well. Does anyone have any idea when this is coming or if it is even on the radar? rumpsummoner https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=65067

djsubject djsubject https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=49359: KVRAF; 10815 posts since 26 Nov, 2004 from UK

Post by djsubject » Sun May 22, 2005 7:42 pm

0
Quote

yea thats what i thought you ment

well over here the work around for that problem is hit F2 then F3 then all pdc should be correct

thats what i heve been doing since i got the uad-1

Subject

https://www.facebook.com/skirizestudios

ObsoleteAcc99 ObsoleteAcc99 https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=1049: Banned; 22457 posts since 5 Sep, 2001

Post by ObsoleteAcc99 » Sun Jun 26, 2005 4:17 am

0
Quote

[DELETED]

Post Reply

47 posts

Return to “Tracktion”

Tracktion Software

KVR Audio

Full Delay Compensation in racks for UAD Plugins and SIR

How high of a priority should full delay compensation for multiple instances of delay introducing pluggins in racks be.