KVR Audio

plexus · Post by **plexus** » Mon May 23, 2005 2:49 pm

hi guys,

i'm pretty new in business so that my question may sound somehow childish for you, but i noticed that except the fact that nuendo has some additional plugs and synths, it workes faster and eats less CPU.
so the real question is: why cubase if nuendo?

thx.

kaze · Post by **kaze** » Mon May 23, 2005 2:53 pm

Price

Highvoltage · Post by **Highvoltage** » Mon May 23, 2005 2:55 pm

bah they make a cheaper and slower version of the same program. BAH

flex42 · Post by **flex42** » Mon May 23, 2005 2:56 pm

Highvoltage · Post by **Highvoltage** » Mon May 23, 2005 3:05 pm

i think so too

plexus · Post by **plexus** » Mon May 23, 2005 3:17 pm

...i thought so...

griels · Post by **griels** » Mon May 23, 2005 3:26 pm

Yes, I'd say price... So that isn't a consideration for you Plexus?

Mike from reFX · Post by **Mike from reFX** » Mon May 23, 2005 5:34 pm

plexus, their performance is identical. They ARE identical except for some additional hardware support in Nuendo and the obvious plugins (no synths missing though) missing.

There is no question: if you don't have the hardware that Nuendo supports (9-pin devices etc.) you don't NEED Nuendo at all. Cubase SX is *identical*.

efluon · Post by **efluon** » Tue May 24, 2005 5:18 am

well, there are some other features missing from cubase, too. (im-/export filters, audition bus, pre/post listen and most prominently i think, the ability to define the offline process history of a clip as a batch-process) but the best reason i think are the colours. it looks so much nicer. i think that has to be the reason, why many ppl think it sounds nicer

cold c · Post by **cold c** » Tue May 24, 2005 5:47 am

efluon, SX3 has the audition bus, you may have to set it up in VST connections (if for some reason it doesn't appear by default).

bduffy · Post by **bduffy** » Tue May 24, 2005 6:37 am

Simple: if your focus is making music, save a lot of money and get Cubase.

fred2112 · Post by **fred2112** » Tue May 24, 2005 7:05 am

cubase do multichanel and video but nuendo do it mutch bether.

If you work whit video and multichanel buy nuendo

If you only doing music production you dont need it !

fred2112 · Post by **fred2112** » Tue May 24, 2005 7:07 am

cubase do multichanel and video but nuendo do it mutch bether.

If you work whit video and multichanel buy nuendo

If you onlu doing music production you dont need it !

efluon · Post by **efluon** » Tue May 24, 2005 12:25 pm

cold c wrote:efluon, SX3 has the audition bus, you may have to set it up in VST connections (if for some reason it doesn't appear by default).

not really. it has a listen bus. this is different..

cold c · Post by **cold c** » Tue May 24, 2005 10:43 pm

efluon wrote:
cold c wrote:efluon, SX3 has the audition bus, you may have to set it up in VST connections (if for some reason it doesn't appear by default).
not really. it has a listen bus. this is different..

Cubase SX3 has the audition bus, you are probably thinking of a separate 'Listen' function (a button) in Nuendo to route a signal to an audition channel.

cubase or nuendo?