KVR Audio

whyterabbyt · Post by **whyterabbyt** » Fri Jun 10, 2005 3:55 pm

wm quoth thanks for the replies, tried a few of them, but actually getting best results from cubases one.

i want classic thick dirty robot btw

will try some more of those suggested though.

You're welcome. Ignore anything J&H says because it'll all be about how nobody else knows what they're talking about but without any actual information of his own.

BTW the cubase vocoder you seem to like is actually basically the same as the mda vocoder J&H is saying is 'no good', all that's changed is that it had a GUI added.

useruseruser · Post by **useruseruser** » Fri Jun 10, 2005 3:55 pm

That is really senseless. I wouldn't communicate with you at that level.

(btw: Everony is actually able to se, who here has a problem with his ego.)

snooky · Post by **snooky** » Fri Jun 10, 2005 3:55 pm

fight, fight. fight!!!!!!!

whyterabbyt · Post by **whyterabbyt** » Fri Jun 10, 2005 3:58 pm

Just going to stick to doing as much as you can to slag off the work of every other developer around, like you always do? Maybe you should spend your effort more wisely on getting the bugs out of your 'ultimate' (bwahahahaha) VST tutorial.

useruseruser · Post by **useruseruser** » Fri Jun 10, 2005 3:58 pm

Why did you download it?
There is no tutorial yet, you know? Merely a "copied" skeleton from the original SDK...

whyterabbyt · Post by **whyterabbyt** » Fri Jun 10, 2005 4:06 pm

Yeah, I'd heard. Seems it lacks in documentation, comments, adherence to the standard, and had immediate bugs, the mention of which caused you to immediately start accusing other people of attacking you for the sake of it, which is amazingly ironic.

In other words, pretty much what was to be expected from someone like yourself with such an overblow sense of their own ability.

useruseruser · Post by **useruseruser** » Fri Jun 10, 2005 4:10 pm

Meybe you _merely_ did not understand all that. Thats was the only problem...

You can stop now (I know, you want always to have the last "word"). I will not reply anymore.

martian · Post by **martian** » Fri Jun 10, 2005 4:12 pm

BTW the cubase vocoder you seem to like is actually basically the same as the mda vocoder J&H is saying is 'no good', all that's changed is that it had a GUI added.

thats what i thought.

useruseruser · Post by **useruseruser** » Fri Jun 10, 2005 4:15 pm

wm wrote:
BTW the cubase vocoder you seem to like is actually basically the same as the mda vocoder J&H is saying is 'no good', all that's changed is that it had a GUI added.
thats what i thought.

And, why did he (you) (the topic starter) actually look for a new ("good") Vocoder? He (you) actually *has/have* the Cubase vocoder, you know?

Shizzo? Eh?

BTW: The suggested old pieces by WhyteRabbyyt are quite different and have completely different (far less) qualities. Therefore "not good". Capito?

whyterabbyt · Post by **whyterabbyt** » Fri Jun 10, 2005 4:22 pm

Amazing, not only have you completely failed to supply any useful information to the thread poster, you're now insulting him as well.

Why the f**k dont you just keep out of threads unless you can actually add something useful that answer the poster, huh? Ignorant f**king child.

useruseruser · Post by **useruseruser** » Fri Jun 10, 2005 4:25 pm

Because I am even not ignorant. That means something completely different, you know?
quot erat demonstrandum

whyterabbyt · Post by **whyterabbyt** » Fri Jun 10, 2005 4:29 pm

An ignorant child quoth BTW: The suggested old pieces by WhyteRabbyyt are quite different and have completely different (far less) qualities. Therefore "not good". Capito?

Of the 11 new VST effects, only DaTube and MIDIGate are Steinberg creations. The other nine (Autopole, BitCrusher, MIDI Comb, Mysterizer, PhatSync, Ring Modulator, Rotary, SubBass, and Vocoder) have been licensed from well-known plug-in developers FXpansion and MDA. Many of these have been freely available for some time, although GUI front-ends have been created for the newly-licensed MDA offerings, which is a welcome addition.

whyterabbyt · Post by **whyterabbyt** » Fri Jun 10, 2005 4:33 pm

jackle&hyde quoth Because I am even not ignorant.

Yes you are.

That means something completely different, you know?

Explain what it is that it is supposed to be different from. You have supplied no comparitive which is an ignorant failure to contextualise.

Then tell me what I was referring to. Because I believe you are ignorant of that, as well.

quot erat demonstrandum

I see your latin sucks as well. Its 'quod', since you seem to be ignorant of that fact as well.

useruseruser · Post by **useruseruser** » Fri Jun 10, 2005 4:37 pm

Ah yes. Sorry. It should be:
" *Quoth* erat demonstrandum"! Of course!

whyterabbyt · Post by **whyterabbyt** » Fri Jun 10, 2005 4:43 pm

No. 'Quod' . I guess you're too ignorant to read as well as ignorant of latin.

any free vocoders?