Good Vocal Mics... any ideas?
- KVRAF
- 1818 posts since 5 Apr, 2002 from Seattle, WA, USA
I also own a Shure SM57 which i use on acoustic guitar but that was off topic.
- Rad Grandad
- 38041 posts since 6 Sep, 2003 from Downeast Maine
Even though it's known for an instrument mic (btw the mxl on the accoustic would be better) the 57 was used by many artists as a stage vocal mic....of course now most singers are wireless...Lady J wrote:I also own a Shure SM57 which i use on acoustic guitar but that was off topic.
The highest form of knowledge is empathy, for it requires us to suspend our egos and live in another's world. It requires profound, purpose‐larger‐than‐the‐self kind of understanding.
- KVRAF
- 1818 posts since 5 Apr, 2002 from Seattle, WA, USA
so true. I have the XLR wireless adapter for my 86 and beta 87aHink wrote:Even though it's known for an instrument mic (btw the mxl on the accoustic would be better) the 57 was used by many artists as a stage vocal mic....of course now most singers are wireless...Lady J wrote:I also own a Shure SM57 which i use on acoustic guitar but that was off topic.
-
- KVRAF
- 1617 posts since 2 Dec, 2003
Hmm... after reading all of this it looks like some good ones are:
- Red5 RV6 - cheap but not much info on the net
- Rode NT1 - more expensive but has great reviews
- MXL V57M - Extremely cheap and supposedly great value, but how does it compare to the other 2?

- KVRAF
- 5703 posts since 8 Dec, 2004 from The Twin Cities
I don't know the Red5 at all, but the Rode has a flatter response than the Marshall, which is weak in the mids.jtxx000 wrote:Hmm... after reading all of this it looks like some good ones are:
- Red5 RV6 - cheap but not much info on the net
- Rode NT1 - more expensive but has great reviews
- MXL V57M - Extremely cheap and supposedly great value, but how does it compare to the other 2?
Remember, though (old timer hat on) that a lot of these chinese LDCs are made with the cheapest components available. They may sound just fine, and good recordings can be made from them (which is true of any mic. really) but for about double the price you can get a fine piece of equipment that you can give to your grandchildren.
Sorry, but after being lectured on this a million times, I am starting to believe it.
-
- KVRAF
- 1615 posts since 28 Mar, 2005
Sure SM-7 !!! inexpensive, smooth.
- Rad Grandad
- 38041 posts since 6 Sep, 2003 from Downeast Maine
Just curious, do you have data to back-up Marshalls being weak in the mids, or is that your opinion? I have not found that at all I just did The Whisper using mine...sorry but I dont (or didn't) see any loss of midrange in those vocals...but I did use voxformer on those vox and I use a tube pre-amp...herodotus wrote:I don't know the Red5 at all, but the Rode has a flatter response than the Marshall, which is weak in the mids.jtxx000 wrote:Hmm... after reading all of this it looks like some good ones are:
- Red5 RV6 - cheap but not much info on the net
- Rode NT1 - more expensive but has great reviews
- MXL V57M - Extremely cheap and supposedly great value, but how does it compare to the other 2?
Remember, though (old timer hat on) that a lot of these chinese LDCs are made with the cheapest components available. They may sound just fine, and good recordings can be made from them (which is true of any mic. really) but for about double the price you can get a fine piece of equipment that you can give to your grandchildren.
Sorry, but after being lectured on this a million times, I am starting to believe it.
The highest form of knowledge is empathy, for it requires us to suspend our egos and live in another's world. It requires profound, purpose‐larger‐than‐the‐self kind of understanding.
- KVRAF
- 5703 posts since 8 Dec, 2004 from The Twin Cities
Good all around mic as well.semiquaver wrote:Sure SM-7 !!! inexpensive, smooth.
-
- KVRAF
- 3299 posts since 7 May, 2004 from Athens, Greece
I got a Shure Beta 57A. Very good results with electric guitar and more than decent with vocals. I gave it to a friend (singer) for a gig and he said that it was much much better than the SM58. After that he gave his M-Audio Solaris (condenser) to test it. First impressions were very positive.
If I go insane, please don't put your wires in my brain


- KVRAF
- 5703 posts since 8 Dec, 2004 from The Twin Cities
The specs that came with it seem to indicate it. Also, we used it as a room mic when recording drums, and compared to the other LDCs we tried it lacked punch.Hink wrote:Just curious, do you have data to back-up Marshalls being weak in the mids, or is that your opinion? I have not found that at all I just did The Whisper using mine...sorry but I dont (or didn't) see any loss of midrange in those vocals...but I did use voxformer on those vox and I use a tube pre-amp...herodotus wrote:I don't know the Red5 at all, but the Rode has a flatter response than the Marshall, which is weak in the mids.jtxx000 wrote:Hmm... after reading all of this it looks like some good ones are:
- Red5 RV6 - cheap but not much info on the net
- Rode NT1 - more expensive but has great reviews
- MXL V57M - Extremely cheap and supposedly great value, but how does it compare to the other 2?
Remember, though (old timer hat on) that a lot of these chinese LDCs are made with the cheapest components available. They may sound just fine, and good recordings can be made from them (which is true of any mic. really) but for about double the price you can get a fine piece of equipment that you can give to your grandchildren.
Sorry, but after being lectured on this a million times, I am starting to believe it.
But I was just comparing two mics, not judging them. I have heard wonderful vocal tracks recorded with the Marshall. (I believe that I have even posted one). It has its own character, and it certainly is not a bad mic. For some voices, it is probably the perfect mic.
But then, I have never met a mic that I didn't want to spend my money on.
-
- KVRAF
- 1821 posts since 5 Oct, 2003
I join the choir of AT-4040 (or 4033)
I can also recommend the AT-4047 very strongly, but that is a bit more than $400.
There is an interesting thread about them here: http://www.3daudioinc.com/cgi-bin/ultim ... 1&t=001361
I can also recommend the AT-4047 very strongly, but that is a bit more than $400.
There is an interesting thread about them here: http://www.3daudioinc.com/cgi-bin/ultim ... 1&t=001361
"Time makes fools of us all. Our only comfort is that greater shall come after us." Eric Temple Bell
http://thetomorrowfile.bandcamp.com/
http://thetomorrowfile.bandcamp.com/
-
Stupid American Pig Stupid American Pig https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=4753
- KVRAF
- 7065 posts since 25 Nov, 2002 from not sure
You dont know man..metamorphosis wrote:Find a Rode in your price-range - I have an NTK - it kick ass.
ok just kidding.
-
- KVRian
- 1119 posts since 29 Jun, 2004 from within you without you
Go with the AT 4040 or Shure SM7.
Maybe reconsider the Rode NT1. The high end is very brittle and tinny-sounding. imho
Maybe reconsider the Rode NT1. The high end is very brittle and tinny-sounding. imho