Help - I've broken my Sinusoidal!! Dither it up please ?
-
- KVRAF
- 4056 posts since 8 Jan, 2005 from Hamilton, New Zealand
Hiya-
having problems with straight audio playback in Tracktion 1.6??? which don't seem to be occuring in other hosts- was wondering if anybody else could shed some light-
essentially if I line up twenty tracks with audio objects on each, play them back with asio drivers set to same sample-rate etc as auio objects, tracktion can only play back 10 of them at once before beginning to stutter-
I've tried this on the 10krpm HD, and on the 7krpm HD.
All tracks are 24-bit, mono, 96khz, on defragged NTFS partitions.
And yet in something like audacity, I can play them realtime, all at once, with no stuttering using the very same audio drivers & hard drives-
Using no effects on any of the tracks- not even panning-
The problem seems to be in tracktion-
realtime priority mode and similar stuff is turned off-
has anybody else encountered this?
Question
m@
having problems with straight audio playback in Tracktion 1.6??? which don't seem to be occuring in other hosts- was wondering if anybody else could shed some light-
essentially if I line up twenty tracks with audio objects on each, play them back with asio drivers set to same sample-rate etc as auio objects, tracktion can only play back 10 of them at once before beginning to stutter-
I've tried this on the 10krpm HD, and on the 7krpm HD.
All tracks are 24-bit, mono, 96khz, on defragged NTFS partitions.
And yet in something like audacity, I can play them realtime, all at once, with no stuttering using the very same audio drivers & hard drives-
Using no effects on any of the tracks- not even panning-
The problem seems to be in tracktion-
realtime priority mode and similar stuff is turned off-
has anybody else encountered this?
Question
m@
Last edited by metamorphosis on Sat Oct 22, 2005 2:08 am, edited 3 times in total.
- KVRAF
- 2750 posts since 2 Feb, 2005 from Raincoast of Grayland
Well on my humble box with 7200rpm I get around 50-60 tracks before I see the dreaded
in the CPU meter and the st-st-stuttering st-st-starts. The
is T's way of saying 'Disk Not Streaming Fast Enuf' or some such.
Are you seeing the
when it stutters? And what latency are you using?
Is this just 20 raw, discrete tracks? Or do they lots of edits in a few or more?
Are you seeing the
Is this just 20 raw, discrete tracks? Or do they lots of edits in a few or more?
perception: the stuff reality is made of.
-
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 4056 posts since 8 Jan, 2005 from Hamilton, New Zealand
Hi Mandolarian
-
I start to see the exclamation once it hits 11 tracks- latency is 1024 samples (default for motu 896hd@96khz) - tried raising latency, no effect-
And yeah, just discrete tracks-
Another thing:
I get a cpu bar spike whenever I scroll up/down/left/right/in/out - I have a geforce 2 gts with latest drivers and it seems strange that it's using so much cpu for visual stuff - still -
no scrolling when I did the testing- so that can't be affecting it-
as I said, tried it on two different drives on two different HD controllers - are you using T2 or T1?
Thanks,
Matt
p.s. also tried on my shitty 'games' yamaha card with directsound driver, no difference I think.
I start to see the exclamation once it hits 11 tracks- latency is 1024 samples (default for motu 896hd@96khz) - tried raising latency, no effect-
And yeah, just discrete tracks-
Another thing:
I get a cpu bar spike whenever I scroll up/down/left/right/in/out - I have a geforce 2 gts with latest drivers and it seems strange that it's using so much cpu for visual stuff - still -
no scrolling when I did the testing- so that can't be affecting it-
as I said, tried it on two different drives on two different HD controllers - are you using T2 or T1?
Thanks,
Matt
p.s. also tried on my shitty 'games' yamaha card with directsound driver, no difference I think.
-
- KVRAF
- 3745 posts since 29 Sep, 2002 from Killafornia
Try zooming all the way out so you can see the entire edit ( F5-F8 ). Sometimes if you're zoomed in too much it'll eat more cpu for some reason.
Last edited by AD80 on Thu Aug 04, 2005 8:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- KVRAF
- 1820 posts since 28 Mar, 2005
i trust you've done the usual, optimizations? background services, turned off the un-neccessary services? unplug your wireless card or unhook your network cable and disable the adapter.
that's all i can think of right now. i've done them all and i can run tons of tracks. i can run about 50 plugs of all types and not a stutter. when im mixing down, i set my latency pretty damned high. i'd go pretty high with that if i were you. it's going to mean that you can get more done. with a higher latency, your meters are going to be slower, butyou can get a pretty great idea of what's going on if you're aware.
out
that's all i can think of right now. i've done them all and i can run tons of tracks. i can run about 50 plugs of all types and not a stutter. when im mixing down, i set my latency pretty damned high. i'd go pretty high with that if i were you. it's going to mean that you can get more done. with a higher latency, your meters are going to be slower, butyou can get a pretty great idea of what's going on if you're aware.
out
-
- KVRAF
- 1600 posts since 1 Apr, 2003 from Seattle, WA
Hmm. No problems here. In testing I ran 36 track 96k sesssions (testing dual ONYX mixers) without problems on a P4 2.8 GHz with a single ATA100 drive. It was definitely at the limit of that system but it kept up.
Ben
Ben
- KVRAF
- 9096 posts since 5 Feb, 2004
I want dual ONYX mixers
I just ordered a $35 behringer POS. Damn financial realities!
If you have requests for Korg VST features or changes, they are listening at https://support.korguser.net/hc/en-us/requests/new
-
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 4056 posts since 8 Jan, 2005 from Hamilton, New Zealand
Cool, thanks AD80 - will try that next time I hop on - but I doubt it'll be enough to fix the problem I'm talking about - I believe tracktion chews through a fair wad of cpu in it's vga rendering - which is why having it zoomed out would have less cpu impact, because then it doesn't have to change screen views (scrolling-while-playing). Will give it a go though.Try zooming all the way out so you can see the entire edit ( F5-F8 ). Sometimes if you're zoomed in too much it'll eat more cpu for some reason.
Yeah, all the usual done - thanks - I am wondering - are you hyperthreading?i trust you've done the usual, optimizations? background services, turned off the un-neccessary services? unplug your wireless card or unhook your network cable and disable the adapter.
that's all i can think of right now. i've done them all and i can run tons of tracks. i can run about 50 plugs of all types and not a stutter. when im mixing down, i set my latency pretty damned high. i'd go pretty high with that if i were you. it's going to mean that you can get more done. with a higher latency, your meters are going to be slower, butyou can get a pretty great idea of what's going on if you're aware.
Cool - are you hyperthreading and/or using T1? Thanks heaps all of you-Hmm. No problems here. In testing I ran 36 track 96k sesssions without problems on a P4 2.8 GHz with a single ATA100 drive. It was definitely at the limit of that system but it kept up.
Cheers,
M@
-
- KVRAF
- 1600 posts since 1 Apr, 2003 from Seattle, WA
-
Distorted_Mastermind Distorted_Mastermind https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=62388
- KVRist
- 391 posts since 22 Mar, 2005 from Kansas City, KS
How much memory do you have? What is your processor speed? The answers to those questions could help a great deal. Also the number of effects plugins would be good to know.
Always remember that others may hate you but those who hate you don't win unless you hate them. And then you destroy yourself.
-Richard M. Nixon
www.myspace.com/pmf
-Richard M. Nixon
www.myspace.com/pmf
-
- KVRist
- 415 posts since 14 Dec, 2004
Are you running an SATA hard disk?
If so, on older chip sets and with certain graphic card combinations you might manifest playback issues. Try play back from an IDE, if the problem goes away then you need a work around. give me a shout and I will point you to a fix.
If so, on older chip sets and with certain graphic card combinations you might manifest playback issues. Try play back from an IDE, if the problem goes away then you need a work around. give me a shout and I will point you to a fix.
-
- KVRian
- 652 posts since 1 Apr, 2005 from Illinois
This is probably a stupid question, but can disabling the wireless and network cable really make that much of a difference? I keep reading this "tweak" on several different sites. What is the real CPU tax from the network stuff amount to? I have a newer Toshiba 3.33 P4 laptop with 1024RAM. Will I benefit much from disabling my wireless, etc when running T2?lharless wrote:i trust you've done the usual, optimizations? background services, turned off the un-neccessary services? unplug your wireless card or unhook your network cable and disable the adapter.
-
- KVRAF
- 4644 posts since 28 Nov, 2002 from Chicago
not a great deal I'd imagine.
Network devices, just like any other hardware device will trigger interrupts which stop the COU from doing the things you want it to be doing. How much of an issue that is, compared to say a video card, is an issue for the individual.
Network devices, just like any other hardware device will trigger interrupts which stop the COU from doing the things you want it to be doing. How much of an issue that is, compared to say a video card, is an issue for the individual.
Someone shot the food. Remember: don't shoot food!
-
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 4056 posts since 8 Jan, 2005 from Hamilton, New Zealand
Hi Mastermind-Distorted_Mastermind wrote:How much memory do you have? What is your processor speed? The answers to those questions could help a great deal. Also the number of effects plugins would be good to know.
plugins irrelevant as I'm not using any on these tracks-
proc-speed: 2.4ghz, 1gb ram. Everything is optimised.
Thanks,
Matt
-
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 4056 posts since 8 Jan, 2005 from Hamilton, New Zealand
Yeah - will try without hyperthreading at some point and see whether that makes a diff-Beno wrote:No on hyperthreading. Are you?
Ben
are you on t2? Cheers- M@

