Is there an EQ like this?
-
- KVRist
- 399 posts since 27 May, 2004 from UK
Hi
I'm using the voxengo curve eq and i really like it's because it is so easy to use. and sounds great.
But it has a latency problem 3072 samples.
To cut a boring story short Cubase sx compensates for this on the audio channels by making a delay and doesn't bother compensating on the vsti channels. Which causes other problems in Cubase like CPU overload etc etc....All a bit nuts.
Is there an eq like this or similar?
Whats the best EQ without delay?
KB
I'm using the voxengo curve eq and i really like it's because it is so easy to use. and sounds great.
But it has a latency problem 3072 samples.
To cut a boring story short Cubase sx compensates for this on the audio channels by making a delay and doesn't bother compensating on the vsti channels. Which causes other problems in Cubase like CPU overload etc etc....All a bit nuts.
Is there an eq like this or similar?
Whats the best EQ without delay?
KB
- KVRAF
- 2750 posts since 2 Feb, 2005 from Raincoast of Grayland
Kjaerhus GEQ7. Don't believe it adds latency. And it sounds great!
perception: the stuff reality is made of.
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 399 posts since 27 May, 2004 from UK
...A bit too covered in buttons....
what i like about the curve eq is the "click on a graph move the pointer around business" if you've ever used it you'll see what i mean.
I've seen that voxengo do another eq I'll have to download the demo to see if it has a latency.
I totally love the curve eq though for "speed eq-ing" approach.
what i like about the curve eq is the "click on a graph move the pointer around business" if you've ever used it you'll see what i mean.
I've seen that voxengo do another eq I'll have to download the demo to see if it has a latency.
I totally love the curve eq though for "speed eq-ing" approach.
-
- KVRAF
- 10597 posts since 13 Jun, 2004 from Alberto Balsam
-
- KVRAF
- 2356 posts since 30 Sep, 2003 from Sunny Staffordshire
Agreed, I Love that EQ. The gui is nice too, very easy to use. Pisses on the Sonalksis gui (man, I can hardly work that thing!).mandolarian wrote:Kjaerhus GEQ7. Don't believe it adds latency. And it sounds great!
My got to EQ is still RenEQ, but that is really just force of habit. Im sure Kjaerhus is just as good, and it sure looks better.
- KVRAF
- 4030 posts since 7 Sep, 2002
-
Christian Budde Christian Budde https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=25572
- KVRAF
- 1538 posts since 14 May, 2004 from Europe
Also have a look at posihfopit. It has a nice feature called: auto-calculation, where you can draw a similar curve on the screen (with the right mouse button) and the EQ is set nearly to that drawn curve. Have a look here:
http://www.kvraudio.com/forum/viewtopic ... sc&start=0
The current version is free, but there will be commercial versions soon, if you prefer it more seriously.
Christian
http://www.kvraudio.com/forum/viewtopic ... sc&start=0
The current version is free, but there will be commercial versions soon, if you prefer it more seriously.
Christian
-
- KVRist
- 96 posts since 8 Apr, 2003 from C:\Steinberg\VstPlugins\...
Sonalksis SV-517 EQ has zero latency, sounds great imho and you can directly drag the curve in the gui.
http://www.kvraudio.com/get/624.html
http://www.kvraudio.com/get/624.html
-
- KVRAF
- 8681 posts since 24 May, 2002 from Tutukaka, New Zealand
Errrrrrr....is it just me or do other people use SX with no latency deficiencies on the VSTi channels? It compensates on all channels apart from live input (obviously). Unless you're using SX1 (dunno if that had full PDC, as I never used it) but SX2 and onwards has full PDC.
Check your settings rather than waste money on a new Eq if you like the one you've got already. I suspect you've maybe changed a setting somewhere that's knocked off PDC - there should be no playback or recording latency on a VSTi channel. I've used huge latency-inducing plugins such as SIR on VSTi channels for both playback and recording, and the PDC works perfectly - I've checked it down to individual samples on the waveforms, and in most cases there is absolutely no latency.
Check your settings rather than waste money on a new Eq if you like the one you've got already. I suspect you've maybe changed a setting somewhere that's knocked off PDC - there should be no playback or recording latency on a VSTi channel. I've used huge latency-inducing plugins such as SIR on VSTi channels for both playback and recording, and the PDC works perfectly - I've checked it down to individual samples on the waveforms, and in most cases there is absolutely no latency.
-
- KVRist
- 261 posts since 31 Oct, 2003
Something like this http://www.kvraudio.com/get/1120.html ?KBKB wrote:what i like about the curve eq is the "click on a graph move the pointer around business" if you've ever used it you'll see what i mean.
snareSpanker
-
- KVRian
- 503 posts since 28 Mar, 2005 from Annapolis, MD
Someone mentioned Firium above. I have Firium. This will only give you the same problem, since it has latency delay of a ? # of samples. Don't know why you are not having compensation with Cubase.
I'd check out the problem before paying money for another equalizer. My favorite equalizer is one from PSP--Master Q--parametric. It causes negligible delay (I don't know about zero--I imagine most things give the tiniest amount of delay because of processing?)
I'd check out the problem before paying money for another equalizer. My favorite equalizer is one from PSP--Master Q--parametric. It causes negligible delay (I don't know about zero--I imagine most things give the tiniest amount of delay because of processing?)
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 399 posts since 27 May, 2004 from UK
Cheers everyone, Good food for thought on the eqs. I'll check them all out.
I feel like a "EQ with a Graph or EQ with a Knob" debate is coming on.
I never really liked eqing until i could eq with a graph.
I feel like a "EQ with a Graph or EQ with a Knob" debate is coming on.
I never really liked eqing until i could eq with a graph.
-
- KVRist
- 301 posts since 5 Jun, 2004
The reason that both firium and curve eq have a lot of samples of delay is due to the fact that they are linear phase eqs which by design will always have some latency. I personally like HarmoniEq for sweetening overall mixes, sonalksis for all my mixing stuff, and the urs A and N series mainly on drums and bass. However if you would like a design more like curve eq I think the FFT filter in samp is latency-free and a search on free fft's should provide something equivalent.
That said
A) Cubase SX 2 and 3 have full PDC
B) Linear phase plugins are not supposed to be cpu light
C) What sort of music do you make (just humour me) ?
That said
A) Cubase SX 2 and 3 have full PDC
B) Linear phase plugins are not supposed to be cpu light
C) What sort of music do you make (just humour me) ?
