Cubase.net = locked threads GALORE!!!

Audio Plugin Hosts and other audio software applications discussion
RELATED
PRODUCTS

Post

Don't use that 'forum' anymore. Call Steinberg with every single question you have, or get in contact with other users directly. Personally I don't particularly fancy wasting my time with power hungry bastards like on that forum. Next step is probably going to be a urine sample. Its not the responsibility of registered Steinberg product users to prove anything to these moderators.
It is more than just a little peculiar how the people who buy their products and actually put the food on their plates by doing so are treated.

Post

xRAVENx wrote:Don't use that 'forum' anymore. Call Steinberg with every single question you have, or get in contact with other users directly. Personally I don't particularly fancy wasting my time with power hungry bastards like on that forum. Next step is probably going to be a urine sample. Its not the responsibility of registered Steinberg product users to prove anything to these moderators.
It is more than just a little peculiar how the people who buy their products and actually put the food on their plates by doing so are treated.
It’s an argument that you can’t win. Steinberg has an inalienable right to require proof of purchase before supplying support. But I don’t think that’s what the closure of Cubase.net is about. It’s about structuring a damage limitation exercise against people who think and state publicly that Cubase is a faulty product.

It’s not the locked threads you should study, it’s the one’s where genuine support is needed that really give me the creeps. You have a number of strategies including: referral to an inappropriate earlier thread, limitation of support to that provided by a small inner circle, and in the final analysis the explicit denunciation of any unsolvable problem as the user’s own problem, and if anybody gets really bolshy, the thread gets locked down. It’s like an aromatherapy forum, aromatherapy is the solution to every illness if it hasn’t worked for you it's your fault.

Cubase.net has been sanitized to prevent any user, legitimate or otherwise, from ever successfully establishing that anything is ever wrong with the product. It’s not about the existing users, it’s about fishing for new ones.

Post

Do people actually still use Cubase?? :-o

Post

Good post HanifH, that's how it appears to me - many problems that were eventually recognised as faults with the software seemed to be blamed on user error & hardware configuration (often souncards etc.).
Fair enough hardware configuration can cause problems, but it seemed to be used as an excuse too often & as you say once people started getting a little miffed at that the threads had a tendency to be locked/deleted.
It's rare that I personally come into contact with SX anymore, so i'm not as au-fait with it anymore (most of the people I know who use/have used it tend to be moving to other packages), even if I was still proficient with it I doubt i'd frequent the steiny forums & answer questions as i'd likely just get threads locked.
They really should think about having a registered & unregistered froum, similar to the props, imo.

Post

Yeah, they're quite fond of blaming *everything* on hardware config over there...

Post

HanafiH wrote:It’s an argument that you can’t win. Steinberg has an inalienable right to require proof of purchase before supplying support.
Thats exactly what I'm talking about, users who Steinberg already knows to be legit, who purchased their licenses and registered their products with them.
If they want only users with registered products to post - they could do that without bothering users and treating them like criminals.
Last edited by pitchdrifter on Mon Aug 29, 2005 9:37 am, edited 1 time in total.

Post

nuffink wrote:There's no mention of cricket at all. What kind of forum is that?
OK, I'm warming to Cubase.Net now :hihi:
Music with dinner is an insult both to the cook and the violinist.

Post

I don't see your problem. They asked you, you filled in your number and the opened it again http://forum.cubase.net/phpbb2/viewtopi ... highlight=

You are a bit sad I think

Post

We are all sad, sad & weary - tears streaming down our grimey ikkle faces as we stare into the shop window at the sweeties we will never be able to taste.
Give us some love pleeeeeeeese.
:(

Post

Forums are full of people who dont want to read manuals or cant be bothered to experiment. Very few bug reports are down to the host but turn out to be down to plugins or the way the pc is configured either hardware wise or full of dodgy apps running in the background.

Post

HI

This was my gripe.

1)Been a member for several months, go to Cubase.net and post a question, 1/2 hour LATER it gerts LOCKED and I am told I have to register.

Do you see?

NOT:

'You can not access the forum unless you register ....'

Further gripe - I did not have access to my dongle so I sent them the registration number and the receipt number - still no go; the smug response was "No dongle-No forum access".

Further gripe: I had to mess around getting hold of the dongle (I had uninstalled SX a few days ago and was getting some product info for other reasons) - I then waited 4 HOURS to get the thread unlocked, I had to send 2 E-Mails to the Moderator who locked it - HE DID NOT RESPOND, I then sent an E-Mail to another moderator asking (very nicely) if he could do something about it ...... FINALLY SOMEONE IS LISTERNING!!!!

The thread was unlocked: by then 100 readers had moved on and I didn't get a worthwhile answer.

So do yopu see my issue now?

OR:

Perhaps I am a winging ....

:help:

BTW: PLUU, do you know me?

Flipper.

Post

Again, I cannot understand why a forum is so hard to access...........what's the point?

What if you just have a plugin? You need to insert your dongle to access the forum for virtual bassist/groove agent?

:shrug:

Post

yeh you are whinging.... :P
< nobody cares what you use >

Post

HanafiH wrote:It’s an argument that you can’t win. Steinberg has an inalienable right to require proof of purchase before supplying support. But I don’t think that’s what the closure of Cubase.net is about. It’s about structuring a damage limitation exercise against people who think and state publicly that Cubase is a faulty product.

It’s not the locked threads you should study, it’s the one’s where genuine support is needed that really give me the creeps. You have a number of strategies including: referral to an inappropriate earlier thread, limitation of support to that provided by a small inner circle, and in the final analysis the explicit denunciation of any unsolvable problem as the user’s own problem, and if anybody gets really bolshy, the thread gets locked down. It’s like an aromatherapy forum, aromatherapy is the solution to every illness if it hasn’t worked for you it's your fault.

Cubase.net has been sanitized to prevent any user, legitimate or otherwise, from ever successfully establishing that anything is ever wrong with the product. It’s not about the existing users, it’s about fishing for new ones.
This is not true, there is a big diference bettwen locking and deleting a thread Anyhow the lock happy attitude of 1 or 2 mods seems childish and unprofessional to me.

Post

I had to dig out my big magnifying glass to even be able to read the numbers on the dongle.

Post Reply

Return to “Hosts & Applications (Sequencers, DAWs, Audio Editors, etc.)”