Simple 3 BAND eq
-
Christian Budde Christian Budde https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=25572
- KVRAF
- 1538 posts since 14 May, 2004 from Europe
You may also want to have a look at my Yamaha 3-Band EQ Clone: http://www-users.rwth-aachen.de/Christi ... mahaEQ.zip
It's a simple rip-off of my mixing desk eq. Ugly graphic, but powerful and simple.
Regards,
Christian
It's a simple rip-off of my mixing desk eq. Ugly graphic, but powerful and simple.
Regards,
Christian
-
- KVRAF
- 5703 posts since 6 Dec, 2003 from Mission Control
A "tone control" is a personal preference. There are standards but they are all over the place. So what's so standard about that? A graphic is not a moving target. You select the frequency and cut/boost.. easy. Same with parametric except you select the frequency to c/b.Marybelle wrote:tomg, thanks for the link. I'm DLing now. It's easier to make a multiband band EQ? That's interesting. Why is that?
Here's a tiny stereo 7-band graphic. http://www.ele4music.com/vst/ge-7s.zip
Regards
- KVRAF
- 19156 posts since 13 Feb, 2003 from Vancouver, Canada
Hey, nice sound on that YamahaEQ. That's a keeper.Christian Budde wrote:You may also want to have a look at my Yamaha 3-Band EQ Clone: http://www-users.rwth-aachen.de/Christi ... mahaEQ.zip
It's a simple rip-off of my mixing desk eq. Ugly graphic, but powerful and simple.
Regards,
Christian
-
- KVRAF
- 5703 posts since 6 Dec, 2003 from Mission Control
Channel out? All fixed.tomg wrote: Here's a tiny stereo 7-band graphic. http://www.ele4music.com/vst/ge-7s.zip
Regards
-
- KVRAF
- 5703 posts since 6 Dec, 2003 from Mission Control
Hey that's pretty nice... I was ABing them in chainer and they sound pretty close in the 9-0-3 range. Your's has a bit more boost/cut than mine. Not really necessary for minior track fixes but good to have. Seems like we are in the same ballpark frequency wise. It gives me hope that I may be on the way to getting it right.Christian Budde wrote:You may also want to have a look at my Yamaha 3-Band EQ Clone: http://www-users.rwth-aachen.de/Christi ... mahaEQ.zip
It's a simple rip-off of my mixing desk eq. Ugly graphic, but powerful and simple.
Regards,
Christian
The neat thing is they sound great together. TrackEQs -> YamahaEQ
Regards
-
- KVRAF
- 5703 posts since 6 Dec, 2003 from Mission Control
I tossed a 3 band parametric together. You still have low-mid-high but you can dial up the frequency for each band. 50-200 400-1.5K 3K-12K. It's not as simple but may be better for overall track use.. Anyway I'm still playing with solutions.
http://www.ele4music.com/vst/peq1s.zip
Regards
http://www.ele4music.com/vst/peq1s.zip
Regards
- KVRian
- 1305 posts since 26 May, 2003 from im müscha...
-
silicon/silicium silicon/silicium https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=33009
- KVRAF
- 1758 posts since 13 Jul, 2004
the yam eq is simple, easy, and good sounding (after posihfopit, I should say your eqs really sound "musical", with a real natural tone.
and I love the twisted knobs
maybe a betabug three buttons plug in in the way, with non twisted knobs??
and I love the twisted knobs
maybe a betabug three buttons plug in in the way, with non twisted knobs??
-
- KVRAF
- 5703 posts since 6 Dec, 2003 from Mission Control
Working version. I got what I wanted.Marybelle wrote:Wow. Christian, your EQ did the trick! Very nice. Very smooth.![]()
tomg, are you still working on yours?
Get the working version here.
http://www.ele4music.com/vst/trkeqs.zip
Regards
-
- KVRAF
- 5703 posts since 6 Dec, 2003 from Mission Control
I put all 3 new versions together in 1 zip. I gotta say I think I was right about the PEQ being the better choice for a track eq. Maybe I'm nuts
but I like it best.
http://www.ele4music.com/vst/eq-pak.zip
EDIT: I forgot to say the EG-7 is now the EG-9
http://www.ele4music.com/vst/eq-pak.zip
EDIT: I forgot to say the EG-7 is now the EG-9
