davor wrote: I sincerely doubt that in 20 years anybody would do covers of meaningless, repetitivne, melody and substance deprived trance, techno, dnb or similar "quasy music".
Talk about intellectual snobbery when it comes to music.
So what exactly is "quasy music" ?
I listen to all sorts of music (have some 2000+ vinyl collection and some 1000+ CD's).
Lots of show tune albums , trad jazz , blues , modern jazz , 80's UK music (you name it I've got it from the Pixies too The Smiths too This Mortal Coil too Yazoo too DepcheMode , Human league , Ultravox ,Tears For Fears , John Foxx , Bauhaus etc etc...
I have tonnes of classical recordings , remastered 78's from the 30's and 40's and so on.
Your generalisation of techno/d'n'b and electronic genres in general is absolutely atrocious.
There's good and bad in any music style if you ask me and if you find D'n'B / Techno / House etc meaningless and and melody deprived you must be listening to some pretty shit electronica in general.
I've got plenty of old techno(detroit) , chicago house and early d'n'b albums that are very melodic.
The House material inparticular is downright funky and soulful with killer vocal deliveries and the like.
I wouldn't classify any of it as quasi music.
Goldies - Inner City Life for example is a D'n'B classic that is both melodic and timeless IMHO.
I could list a swag of great oldskool house tunes that will stand the test of time also and there are some truly classic techno albums out there also that aren't melody deprived or lacking in form , structure and compositional prowess.
Music falls in two categories good or bad for what it's worth and regardless of style or genre I can find a mix of both in any music I listen too.
It's a pitty you can't do the same.


