Destiny's Child Breakup

Anything about MUSIC but doesn't fit into the forums above.
Post Reply New Topic
RELATED
PRODUCTS

Post

munchkin wrote:I hesitate to raise this thorny issue but apart from the fact that Beyonce is beautiful do you think she has been marketed more because her image has been projected as less 'black' than the other two? In the image below for example, Beyonce could be an exotic Latino or even a WASP with a dark tan.
I think there has been a recurrance of this strategy in pop history by record companies and it's well dodgy IMO. I don't doubt that Beyonce is very talented but I'm sure Kelly is too. I'm completely aware that ethnicity is very diverse but certain types of ethnicity appear to be favoured more than others by record companies and other areas of the media. What do others think?
I think the entertainment industry takes pretty, talented girls and tries to turn them all into the same, homogenous blonde. You see it time and time again, they cast them in bland, predictable movies, give them bland, predictable production and overexposure and then wonder why nobody gives a shit anymore!

I don't know what industry mogul gets to decide all this stuff, but he's a drag.

Post

I do think Beyonce looks amazing and no more vulgar than many other women musicians these days. But the look is very plastic and I suppose it has it's roots in the porn industry. But most male/female mass-marketed pop is one step away from porn these days anyway. I think exposed pubes will be the next big thing in pop. Gyne pop! Procto pop!
Last edited by munchkin on Wed Nov 16, 2005 7:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Post

never cared, never will... :P

Post

munchkin wrote:I do think Beyonce looks amazing and no more vulgar than many other women musicians these days. But the look is very plastic and I suppose it has it's roots in the porn industry. But most male/female mass-marketed pop is one step away from porn these days anyway.
Hmmm...makeup and fashion existed long before the porn industry, methinks. If you're referring to the modern porn industry.

Post

bduffy wrote: I think the entertainment industry takes pretty, talented girls and tries to turn them all into the same, homogenous blonde. You see it time and time again, they cast them in bland, predictable movies, give them bland, predictable production and overexposure and then wonder why nobody gives a shit anymore!

I don't know what industry mogul gets to decide all this stuff, but he's a drag.
Beyonce's hip thrusting, doggy-style writhing on all fours, then flipping over and sticking one leg up in the air: that don't look like the typical choreography to me. She's pushed the boat out further.
Every day takes figuring out all over again how to f#ckin’ live.

Post

bduffy wrote:
munchkin wrote:I do think Beyonce looks amazing and no more vulgar than many other women musicians these days. But the look is very plastic and I suppose it has it's roots in the porn industry. But most male/female mass-marketed pop is one step away from porn these days anyway.
Hmmm...makeup and fashion existed long before the porn industry, methinks. If you're referring to the modern porn industry.
I agree but I think the image of pop stars and porn stars has never been closer in pop history. There was a brief period in the 70's when disco diva's looked like they were out of a colour climax mag but I think the music styles of the 80's and 90's led to a divergence of images.

Now that sex is so upfront in the pop agenda and pop has become homogenous product. I believe it's incorporating porn images to add titilation to an otherwise sterile environment.

Post

chagzuki wrote:
bduffy wrote: I think the entertainment industry takes pretty, talented girls and tries to turn them all into the same, homogenous blonde. You see it time and time again, they cast them in bland, predictable movies, give them bland, predictable production and overexposure and then wonder why nobody gives a shit anymore!

I don't know what industry mogul gets to decide all this stuff, but he's a drag.
Beyonce's hip thrusting, doggy-style writhing on all fours, then flipping over and sticking one leg up in the air: that don't look like the typical choreography to me. She's pushed the boat out further.
And I would like to catch that boat! :P

Not sure I agree: don't you remember "Justify My Love" by Madonna? I don't think Beyonce has really crossed any new lines here.

Post

Lady J wrote:I'm watching their final performance together on TV right now and I'm probably one of the few people here who is sad to see them break up.
And I'm probably the only one who had to Google to find out who they were.

Post

bduffy wrote: Not sure I agree: don't you remember "Justify My Love" by Madonna? I don't think Beyonce has really crossed any new lines here.
Yeah, you're right there.
Every day takes figuring out all over again how to f#ckin’ live.

Post

didn't the justify my love video get banned/only allowed after the watershed?
It was very in your face, the beyonce style shit just creeps though, right at the edge of what could be tolerated.
I agree that 'crazy in love' pushed the boat, she was very artfully 'un-dressed' for that one, tits swinging all over & then the doggy style thrusting bit 'come on take me big boy, right up the chutney-tunnel'.
I thought it was starting (or continuing) to go wrong when Britney paraded round in schoolgirl dress on that video she did early days, paedophiles paradise.

Post

munchkin wrote:
bduffy wrote:
munchkin wrote:I do think Beyonce looks amazing and no more vulgar than many other women musicians these days. But the look is very plastic and I suppose it has it's roots in the porn industry. But most male/female mass-marketed pop is one step away from porn these days anyway.
Hmmm...makeup and fashion existed long before the porn industry, methinks. If you're referring to the modern porn industry.
I agree but I think the image of pop stars and porn stars has never been closer in pop history. There was a brief period in the 70's when disco diva's looked like they were out of a colour climax mag but I think the music styles of the 80's and 90's led to a divergence of images.

Now that sex is so upfront in the pop agenda and pop has become homogenous product. I believe it's incorporating porn images to add titilation to an otherwise sterile environment.
OK, where's Lady J? This would probably require a whole deviation into a repression-of-women/Madonna-whore-complex type thing.

You'll notice the further we are into the supposed equality movements or women and minorities, the more unattainable, elitist role models are assigned. Skinny, slutty women-playthings; macho, rich-overnight men. Kinda makes you feel like nothing if you aspire to it...

Post

diverdee wrote:didn't the justify my love video get banned/only allowed after the watershed?
It was very in your face, the beyonce style shit just creeps though, right at the edge of what could be tolerated.
I agree that 'crazy in love' pushed the boat, she was very artfully 'un-dressed' for that one, tits swinging all over & then the doggy style thrusting bit 'come on take me big boy, right up the chutney-tunnel'.
I thought it was starting (or continuing) to go wrong when Britney paraded round in schoolgirl dress on that video she did early days, paedophiles paradise.
Absolutely. Keep us titilated and distracted with ever-increasingly stimulating forms of entertainment. And then keep us at each other's throats arguing about decency. Meanwhile, your government is invading or destabilizing some other country you've never heard of, for profit - and you never knew cos you were watching some dolled-up female swinging about on TV, and your sister want to be her.

Some say. :shrug:

Post

Oh come on! No one is going to take me to the cleaners for this blatantly leftist bullshit? :lol:

Post

"Oh come on! No one is going to take me to the cleaners for this blatantly leftist bullshit? "
some folks like blatantly leftist bullshit...

Post

being blatantly leftist I completely agree.
entertainment, infotainment, soundbites, no (or hard to find) in depth analysis, sex sells, the rise of 'celebrity' this & 'celebrity' that (with celebrities who become celebrities because they shag other 'celebrities' & then sell their story to 'celebrity' magazines & then end up on 'celebrity' love island etc. re: abi titmus et al.)
John Pilger did a good bit in one of his books about the 'destruction' of fleet street, the downfall of the 'intelligent' working class media etc.
Not saying there's a conspiracy or anything, just a related set of events/circumstances that are integral parts of the mass-consumerist ostensibly 'free' market capitalist system.
Dumb little consumeroids is whats we needs precious, those working class plebians that actually think & question the status-quo, we hates 'em we hates 'em.

Post Reply

Return to “Everything Else (Music related)”