KVR Audio

aMUSEd · Post by **aMUSEd** » Fri Dec 16, 2005 4:57 pm

Muff Wiggler wrote:so do i

Maybe...but I bet this one is more shiny

and less cheesy

akisd28 · Post by **akisd28** » Fri Dec 16, 2005 5:08 pm

Am I the only one who has problems with the installer? I've downloaded it 3 times and every time I run it, it only installs the manual (no matter whether I choose custom or complete installation_. When I open the archive with WinRAR, I get a message that the archive is corrupt when I try to extract the .dll.

I'm on PC.

bduffy · Post by **bduffy** » Fri Dec 16, 2005 5:12 pm

akisd28 wrote:Am I the only one who has problems with the installer? I've downloaded it 3 times and every time I run it, it only installs the manual (no matter whether I choose custom or complete installation_. When I open the archive with WinRAR, I get a message that the archive is corrupt when I try to extract the .dll.

I'm on PC.

I almost missed it. Choose "Custom" then look at the far left, there is a button named "Change". You can change the install dir there. Lame installer!

akisd28 · Post by **akisd28** » Fri Dec 16, 2005 5:16 pm

Thanks, I'll try it now!

bduffy · Post by **bduffy** » Fri Dec 16, 2005 5:19 pm

Man. $200 USD for this? With the release of Tone2's wonderful BiFilter, I'm not sure if that price tag is justifiable. It's a great plug (love the big dial!), but $200...ich don't think so.

akisd28 · Post by **akisd28** » Fri Dec 16, 2005 5:25 pm

Ditto...

Sickle · Post by **Sickle** » Fri Dec 16, 2005 5:26 pm

shamann wrote:Maybe somebody will come along to explain its value.

bduffy · Post by **bduffy** » Fri Dec 16, 2005 5:34 pm

Sickle wrote:
shamann wrote:Maybe somebody will come along to explain its value.

Orally fixated chicks high on Ecstasy? Might be worth $200.

shamann · Post by **shamann** » Fri Dec 16, 2005 5:36 pm

Indeed, that's quite the value. Hats off to Sonalksis!!!

shamann · Post by **shamann** » Fri Dec 16, 2005 5:47 pm

So I was doing some quick testing with the demo.

Here's a test clip, first bit is just an untreated tone, second bit is the Sonalksis filter, first at 12db slope on Rude, halfway through I flip to 48db on Rude. Last bit is another, unnamed filter for comparison, which is designed to be decidedly more rude sounding.

The Sonalksis has a pleasing sound, and the control action is very smooth, so good marks for that.

I have a lot of filters on hand, I don't know how essential one is over another unless I see a unique application in it. I'm not seeing heap loads of unique applications here.

cl516 · Post by **cl516** » Fri Dec 16, 2005 6:59 pm

i find this fillter very smooth and good sounding.
and from quick demoing, doesn't seem to turn my audio into plastic sandpaper.

loopdon · Post by **loopdon** » Fri Dec 16, 2005 7:10 pm

cl516 wrote:i find this fillter very smooth and good sounding.
and from quick demoing, doesn't seem to turn my audio into plastic sandpaper.

true! it's nice. only problem is see is the price range

Sickle · Post by **Sickle** » Fri Dec 16, 2005 8:40 pm

Sickle · Post by **Sickle** » Fri Dec 16, 2005 8:41 pm

shamann · Post by **shamann** » Fri Dec 16, 2005 8:52 pm

So then, what you're saying is

&

Sonalksis TBK