Its the third time he's rehashed that in as many weeks, and he didnt think it up on his own, its borrowed from someone else, although when it got said all he could manage was 'me too'. Its not quite as impressive that way.xander wrote:Le Chase wrote:Whytrabbyt youre such a moron![]()
How can you seriously break down what someone says into fragments like that - out of context - and respond to each fragment, taking what they say to such an extreme that it becomes meaningless. By the time youre done you're comments about someone's broken-up post are completely irrevelent, which is why afterwards the poster who's post you truncated spends the rest of the thread explaining to you what they actually meant. o rly.![]()
Why, Mssr Le chase... How totally and surprisingly appropo your words can be sometimes...
I am turning into a theory slut
- Beware the Quoth
- 35428 posts since 4 Sep, 2001 from R'lyeh Oceanic Amusement Park and Funfair
An idiot on Set Theory:
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."
-
- KVRAF
- 7315 posts since 7 Mar, 2003
- Beware the Quoth
- 35428 posts since 4 Sep, 2001 from R'lyeh Oceanic Amusement Park and Funfair
No, Im expressing a difference of opinion, and feel that that difference of opinion originates in the things that people are conveniently bypassing as they resort to generalisation and assumption, so Im highlighting the flaws in those statements to explain why I feel justified in believing differently.Ildon wrote: Whyterabbyt just seems to be trying to stir things up. I'll never understand that behavior.
That seems to have warranted multiple ad hominem attacks from a number of people with an investment in the thing I disagree with. Including you, now.
I'll never understand that behaviour.
('Cept for Chase, of course, he just waits till there's a big enough crowd to be 'me too' with.)
Guess I should just shut up, because you lot are all perfectly happy to have a go at those who dont agree with The One True Way. Same as usual at KVR.
An idiot on Set Theory:
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."
- Beware the Quoth
- 35428 posts since 4 Sep, 2001 from R'lyeh Oceanic Amusement Park and Funfair
Huh?Chibs' Bath Toy wrote:I buggered the Rabbit!!! YAY!
An idiot on Set Theory:
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."
-
- KVRAF
- 10597 posts since 13 Jun, 2004 from Alberto Balsam
You wish. Just because other people might often say simular things about you doesnt mean im rehashing, silly.whyterabbyt wrote:Its the third time he's rehashed that in as many weeks, and he didnt think it up on his own, its borrowed from someone else, although when it got said all he could manage was 'me too'. Its not quite as impressive that way.xander wrote:Le Chase wrote:Whytrabbyt youre such a moron![]()
How can you seriously break down what someone says into fragments like that - out of context - and respond to each fragment, taking what they say to such an extreme that it becomes meaningless. By the time youre done you're comments about someone's broken-up post are completely irrevelent, which is why afterwards the poster who's post you truncated spends the rest of the thread explaining to you what they actually meant. o rly.![]()
Why, Mssr Le chase... How totally and surprisingly appropo your words can be sometimes...
-
- KVRAF
- 6519 posts since 13 Mar, 2002 from UK
I'm gonna try once more for old times sake.whyterabbyt wrote:I had a problem with the statements you were making, and gave my reasons as I went along. Is that a problem for you?nuffink wrote: What the f**k's that about Sean?
'Juggling with semantics'. Yeah right, whatever. You make a lot of half-assed claims that dont stand up on their own two feet, but you're allowed to do that because you're not one of 'the wankers' is that it?That pompous, pointless juggling with sematics is what you do with the wankers, remember.
Sorry, someone needs to remind me who has special priveleges again, I seem to have lost my list.
Oh well, its a privelege to be called 'pompous' by someone who states "I was ignorant and then I learned so I can tell which is the superior state."
I was arguing with you; the basis of your comments were unilaterally flawed and one-sided. The fact that you'd rather resort to a series of personal attacks because I chose to point that out... well... that would be the bollocks.Argue with me if you disagree, but that's just bollocks.
At least xander is entering into a dialogue, rather than just resorting to venom and spit because you got your temper piqued.
That wasn't venom. Shock and disappointment maybe.
I'll cheerfully show you what venom looks like.
Just fill in the blanks and we'll go to war.
-
- KVRAF
- 10597 posts since 13 Jun, 2004 from Alberto Balsam
If i waited for these people it wouldnt matter because I'd still be there first, IE originality. My points would still stand strong, including my point that youre a douche bag who argues with people's points that they dont mean.whyterabbyt wrote:Cept for Chase, of course, he just waits till there's a big enough crowd to be 'me too' with.
Last edited by The Chase on Wed Jan 04, 2006 11:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- KVRAF
- 7315 posts since 7 Mar, 2003
You remember, last night? Your girl was asleep on the couch after that big argument about who really won scrabble. You and I then took a chance at playing cock-hockey?whyterabbyt wrote:Huh?Chibs' Bath Toy wrote:I buggered the Rabbit!!! YAY!
Surely you remember??
My Youtube Channel - Wires Dream Disasters
-
- KVRAF
- 10597 posts since 13 Jun, 2004 from Alberto Balsam
Chibs' Bath Toy wrote:after that big argument about who really won scrabble
I could totally imagine that, minus the girl part.
- Beware the Quoth
- 35428 posts since 4 Sep, 2001 from R'lyeh Oceanic Amusement Park and Funfair
Ah right. You've been on the meths again. You have fun with that.Chibs' Bath Toy wrote: You remember, last night? Your girl was asleep on the couch after that big argument about who really won scrabble. You and I then took a chance at playing cock-hockey?
Surely you remember??
An idiot on Set Theory:
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 445 posts since 24 Apr, 2005
I started the best thread ever.
- Beware the Quoth
- 35428 posts since 4 Sep, 2001 from R'lyeh Oceanic Amusement Park and Funfair
Try what? Threats to make some massive issue out of me disagreeing with you?nuffink wrote:
I'm gonna try once more for old times sake.
That someone disagreed with you? Erm, okay.That wasn't venom. Shock and disappointment maybe.
Whatever.I'll cheerfully show you what venom looks like.
Just fill in the blanks and we'll go to war.
An idiot on Set Theory:
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."
-
- KVRAF
- 6519 posts since 13 Mar, 2002 from UK
-
- KVRAF
- 13442 posts since 14 Nov, 2000 from Hannover / Germany
Nice post, herodotus!
There are 3 kinds of people:
Those who can do maths and those who can't.
Those who can do maths and those who can't.
