I am turning into a theory slut

Chords, scales, harmony, melody, etc.
Post Reply New Topic
RELATED
PRODUCTS

Post

xander wrote:
Le Chase wrote:Whytrabbyt youre such a moron :lol:

How can you seriously break down what someone says into fragments like that - out of context - and respond to each fragment, taking what they say to such an extreme that it becomes meaningless. By the time youre done you're comments about someone's broken-up post are completely irrevelent, which is why afterwards the poster who's post you truncated spends the rest of the thread explaining to you what they actually meant. o rly.
:o

Why, Mssr Le chase :shock: ... How totally and surprisingly appropo your words can be sometimes...
Its the third time he's rehashed that in as many weeks, and he didnt think it up on his own, its borrowed from someone else, although when it got said all he could manage was 'me too'. Its not quite as impressive that way.
An idiot on Set Theory:
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."

Post

I buggered the Rabbit!!! YAY!
My Youtube Channel - Wires Dream Disasters

Post

Ildon wrote: Whyterabbyt just seems to be trying to stir things up. I'll never understand that behavior.
No, Im expressing a difference of opinion, and feel that that difference of opinion originates in the things that people are conveniently bypassing as they resort to generalisation and assumption, so Im highlighting the flaws in those statements to explain why I feel justified in believing differently.

That seems to have warranted multiple ad hominem attacks from a number of people with an investment in the thing I disagree with. Including you, now.

I'll never understand that behaviour.

('Cept for Chase, of course, he just waits till there's a big enough crowd to be 'me too' with.)

Guess I should just shut up, because you lot are all perfectly happy to have a go at those who dont agree with The One True Way. Same as usual at KVR.
An idiot on Set Theory:
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."

Post

Chibs' Bath Toy wrote:I buggered the Rabbit!!! YAY!
Huh?
An idiot on Set Theory:
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."

Post

whyterabbyt wrote:
xander wrote:
Le Chase wrote:Whytrabbyt youre such a moron :lol:

How can you seriously break down what someone says into fragments like that - out of context - and respond to each fragment, taking what they say to such an extreme that it becomes meaningless. By the time youre done you're comments about someone's broken-up post are completely irrevelent, which is why afterwards the poster who's post you truncated spends the rest of the thread explaining to you what they actually meant. o rly.
:o

Why, Mssr Le chase :shock: ... How totally and surprisingly appropo your words can be sometimes...
Its the third time he's rehashed that in as many weeks, and he didnt think it up on his own, its borrowed from someone else, although when it got said all he could manage was 'me too'. Its not quite as impressive that way.
You wish. Just because other people might often say simular things about you doesnt mean im rehashing, silly.

Post

whyterabbyt wrote:
nuffink wrote: What the f**k's that about Sean?
I had a problem with the statements you were making, and gave my reasons as I went along. Is that a problem for you?
That pompous, pointless juggling with sematics is what you do with the wankers, remember.
'Juggling with semantics'. Yeah right, whatever. You make a lot of half-assed claims that dont stand up on their own two feet, but you're allowed to do that because you're not one of 'the wankers' is that it?

Sorry, someone needs to remind me who has special priveleges again, I seem to have lost my list.

Oh well, its a privelege to be called 'pompous' by someone who states "I was ignorant and then I learned so I can tell which is the superior state."
Argue with me if you disagree, but that's just bollocks.
I was arguing with you; the basis of your comments were unilaterally flawed and one-sided. The fact that you'd rather resort to a series of personal attacks because I chose to point that out... well... that would be the bollocks.

At least xander is entering into a dialogue, rather than just resorting to venom and spit because you got your temper piqued.
I'm gonna try once more for old times sake.


That wasn't venom. Shock and disappointment maybe.


I'll cheerfully show you what venom looks like.


Just fill in the blanks and we'll go to war.
Image
Now with improved MIDI jitter!

Post

whyterabbyt wrote:Cept for Chase, of course, he just waits till there's a big enough crowd to be 'me too' with.
If i waited for these people it wouldnt matter because I'd still be there first, IE originality. My points would still stand strong, including my point that youre a douche bag who argues with people's points that they dont mean.
Last edited by The Chase on Wed Jan 04, 2006 11:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Post

whyterabbyt wrote:
Chibs' Bath Toy wrote:I buggered the Rabbit!!! YAY!
Huh?
You remember, last night? Your girl was asleep on the couch after that big argument about who really won scrabble. You and I then took a chance at playing cock-hockey?

Surely you remember??
My Youtube Channel - Wires Dream Disasters

Post

Chibs' Bath Toy wrote:after that big argument about who really won scrabble
:lol:

I could totally imagine that, minus the girl part.

Post

Chibs' Bath Toy wrote: You remember, last night? Your girl was asleep on the couch after that big argument about who really won scrabble. You and I then took a chance at playing cock-hockey?
Surely you remember??
Ah right. You've been on the meths again. You have fun with that.
An idiot on Set Theory:
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."

Post

I started the best thread ever.

Post

nuffink wrote:
I'm gonna try once more for old times sake.
Try what? Threats to make some massive issue out of me disagreeing with you?
That wasn't venom. Shock and disappointment maybe.
That someone disagreed with you? Erm, okay.
I'll cheerfully show you what venom looks like.


Just fill in the blanks and we'll go to war.
Whatever.
An idiot on Set Theory:
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."

Post

game on
Image
Now with improved MIDI jitter!

Post

Who's got the popcorn? :)

ew
A spectral heretic...

Post

Nice post, herodotus!
There are 3 kinds of people:
Those who can do maths and those who can't.

Post Reply

Return to “Music Theory”