dude you're way out of line here...Jens is a top notch person, as is Greg...I am more than proud to call both friends and at the same time humbled by the respect they have shown me...I really think before you call someone a douchebag you should get to know someone before you attack them, especially someone like Jens...agentdark1 wrote:yes but you sound like a royal douchebag so I really dont give a shit if you find him funny or not.
Douche-bag is chiefly American.jens wrote:sorry bud, but as I'm not a native English-speaker I've got not the slightest idea what a 'royal douchebag' might be (i.e. I've got not much knowledge about British lower class slang)...
b.t.w.: who are you? - it seems all (or at least most) of your 26 posts are in this thread so please excuse my curiosity...
(giggles are his contribution to the thread)Chibs' Bath Toy wrote:Douche-bag is chiefly American.jens wrote:sorry bud, but as I'm not a native English-speaker I've got not the slightest idea what a 'royal douchebag' might be (i.e. I've got not much knowledge about British lower class slang)...
b.t.w.: who are you? - it seems all (or at least most) of your 26 posts are in this thread so please excuse my curiosity...
A guy is sitting at the bar a says to the bartender " Give that Douchebag at the end of the bar a drink". The bartender says "Sir we don't use that kind of language in this establishment". Ok I apologize just get her a drink. The bartender goes over and tells the woman that the guy wants to buy her a drink. "What will you have?" says the barkeep. " Vinegar and water" says the woman.Lunch Money wrote:A douche (taken from the French for "shower") is a little bottle-like device that women use to clean their vaginas. Some of these devices used a "bag", sort of like a hot water bottle in appearance, to hold the water with which the women could douche.
That's a douchebag. A part of a device used to clean women's vaginas.
Greg
no, no, no...it's too pc to get the thread locked...Teksonik wrote:If that doesn't get the thread locked nothing will.
" 
24 hours is a long time, especially if you're re-using code._niko_ wrote:Add to this the usual browser incompatabilties and quirks and testing for that and a day is pretty optimistic I'd say. You can always prove me wrong, of course
It depends on the client._niko_ wrote:Even then, what do you think an average web designer charges per hour?
I have and am devoting days and days of work (photography, design and web development) to someone who's working entirely for profit (and charges a lot for an excellent product). Why? Because I want to. Is it noble? What the f**k do I care? I'm doing it because I feel like it. And anyone who feels like disparaging me for that decision can talk to my hairy asshole. How about that? Does that compare?_niko_ wrote:I also don't see at all, how this compares to the work you put into Betabugs or GVst. Both are idealism driven projects, offering sth. to the community for free (or a donation) and thus non profit driven. Soundspectral on the other hand want to sell their plugins to the community. The estimated price mentioned so far, doesn't sound very community friendly either to me, so how exactly is this a noble cause that deserves free support?
I have noticed (as a long time lurker) that many KVR threads have a certain amount of acrimony, which is unfortunate as I think this is a really great forum. I attribute it to a lack of moderation of the threads, but I know that Muse has better things to do than keep watch on the kiddies.G-Ro124 wrote:As usual, a KVR thread becomes a gang battle against one individual.
I sympathize with you Greg: sometimes, KVRers become a group of rabid hounds, many times unfairly
A touch of a moderator's hand would definitely reduce the signal-to-noise ratio.
MrM wrote:I believe this ampsim will see the light of day.
Midiworks, keep going on!
Submit: News, Plugins, Hosts & Apps | Advertise @ KVR | Developer Account | About KVR / Contact Us | Privacy Statement
© KVR Audio, Inc. 2000-2026
