zebra2
-
original flipper original flipper https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=8999
- KVRAF
- 2544 posts since 14 Sep, 2003 from Essex
HI
This is my concern as well - in fact I find that moving modules around the matrix can bring XT to a momentary standstill - and this is quite often.
Flipper.
This is my concern as well - in fact I find that moving modules around the matrix can bring XT to a momentary standstill - and this is quite often.
Flipper.
- u-he
- 30209 posts since 8 Aug, 2002 from Berlin
I understand your concerns.
Honestly, I'd be more concerned if some of the presets were *not* cpu hogs. Having 15-20 modules running per voice is quite something.
There may be room for further optimization, but not much. In some cases (oscillators, filters) I've already squeezed every cpu cycle out of the algorithms.
However, if doing anything in the gui brings your cpu to its end, something is wrong in your host. The gui can be extremely cpu exhaustive, but it should run in a low priority thread, only draining otherwise idle processor cycles. My gui framework is btw. relatively fast, i.e. compared to other plugins using VSTGUI etc. - Use a cpu performance monitor while tweaking Z2's MultiStage envelopes and compare to any other VSTi with similar complex envelope controls.
I don't think it's a problematic issue. Most patches will be moderate in cpu usage, some will be cpu hogs and - like in FilterscapeVA - there'll also be a lot of eco presets.
Cheers,
Urs
Honestly, I'd be more concerned if some of the presets were *not* cpu hogs. Having 15-20 modules running per voice is quite something.
There may be room for further optimization, but not much. In some cases (oscillators, filters) I've already squeezed every cpu cycle out of the algorithms.
However, if doing anything in the gui brings your cpu to its end, something is wrong in your host. The gui can be extremely cpu exhaustive, but it should run in a low priority thread, only draining otherwise idle processor cycles. My gui framework is btw. relatively fast, i.e. compared to other plugins using VSTGUI etc. - Use a cpu performance monitor while tweaking Z2's MultiStage envelopes and compare to any other VSTi with similar complex envelope controls.
I don't think it's a problematic issue. Most patches will be moderate in cpu usage, some will be cpu hogs and - like in FilterscapeVA - there'll also be a lot of eco presets.
Cheers,
-
- KVRAF
- 10815 posts since 26 Nov, 2004 from UK
-
- KVRAF
- 7032 posts since 28 Apr, 2004 from france
I have installed the demo version of Z2, and now, i would like to uninstall it... i see a folder in my vst folder, a folder in C: , but i don't know how to uninstall it... I don't see it in my list of programs, nor in the windows remove programs menu, nor an uninstall executable in the Zebra2 folder...
-
- KVRAF
- 10815 posts since 26 Nov, 2004 from UK
just deleate the Zebra 2 folder you copyed to your vst plugin folder
Subz
Subz
-
- KVRAF
- 2217 posts since 15 Jul, 2003
re: cpu usage
some of us have run into this already when Tim Conrardy discovered rhino and made a bank with his algorithmic patches. After that he and Tick conferred and shared methods of creating the same or similar effects with less cpu use.
so I would also expect as people explore the many capabilities of Zebra that they don't initially give much thought to cpu eficiency. given the great idea of continuing to build up a user library site of presets, that might also include some tips about designing efficiently. there are some very skilled sound designers in the community already and i'm sure they're all still picking up on what Zebra can do. And fortunately most hosts have some sort of freeze function these days.
some of us have run into this already when Tim Conrardy discovered rhino and made a bank with his algorithmic patches. After that he and Tick conferred and shared methods of creating the same or similar effects with less cpu use.
so I would also expect as people explore the many capabilities of Zebra that they don't initially give much thought to cpu eficiency. given the great idea of continuing to build up a user library site of presets, that might also include some tips about designing efficiently. there are some very skilled sound designers in the community already and i'm sure they're all still picking up on what Zebra can do. And fortunately most hosts have some sort of freeze function these days.
-
- KVRAF
- 7032 posts since 28 Apr, 2004 from france
okdjsubject wrote:just deleate the Zebra 2 folder you copyed to your vst plugin folder
Subz
i was just wondering if any changes were made to the registry... ?
- u-he
- 30209 posts since 8 Aug, 2002 from Berlin
Nope, the point about my not-so-common way of handling things (a special data folder next to the plugin, stuff that should persist across updates being put in the program files directory) is *because* I don't wanna mess with the Registry or anything else. Just trash stuff and it's gone.sinkmusic wrote:okdjsubject wrote:just deleate the Zebra 2 folder you copyed to your vst plugin folder
Subz
i was just wondering if any changes were made to the registry... ?
Any hints why you don't wanna keep it?
Cheers,
-
- KVRist
- 296 posts since 15 Dec, 2003 from Upstate New York
I appreciate that. I don't like plugins that mess with the registry.Urs wrote:Nope, the point about my not-so-common way of handling things (a special data folder next to the plugin, stuff that should persist across updates being put in the program files directory) is *because* I don't wanna mess with the Registry or anything else. Just trash stuff and it's gone.
-
- KVRAF
- 7032 posts since 28 Apr, 2004 from france
Yes.Any hints why you don't wanna keep it?
Don't worry about your stuff, it is quality.
But i used to like very simple synths, and i think Zebra is a little too huge.
I have found german Keyboard magazine, and the point is that i think i am much more comfortable with that zebralette cut-up version of Zebra ! This might sound strange, but the fact is that it is my point...
This is the reason too why i can't hardly get into NI synths... THe sound is awesome too, but i never can find a place for it in my mix, the sound worths for itself alone... !
-
machinesworking machinesworking https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=8505
- KVRAF
- 8025 posts since 15 Aug, 2003 from seattle
I exist on that other planet, where Zebra ( now 2), Absynth, and Reactor are in almost every song I do.sinkmusic wrote:This is the reason too why i can't hardly get into NI synths... THe sound is awesome too, but i never can find a place for it in my mix,
-
- KVRist
- 130 posts since 17 Dec, 2003 from Germany
I, too, do think that presets in all of these synth tend to be over-hyped, with too much movement+ effects, too broad and such things.
I always cut them down somehow before working with them (=Reaktor, Zebra, Atmosphere, all.)
Of course it's not a fault of the synths, it's the demo attitude of the patches.
So I'd have nothing against some more basic or "orchestrateable" Presets.
(BTW I prefer these as starting points to the big ones)
u
I always cut them down somehow before working with them (=Reaktor, Zebra, Atmosphere, all.)
Of course it's not a fault of the synths, it's the demo attitude of the patches.
So I'd have nothing against some more basic or "orchestrateable" Presets.
(BTW I prefer these as starting points to the big ones)
u
-
- KVRist
- 124 posts since 24 Oct, 2004
cpu usage again:
might it be that Zebra VST consumes more CPU than Zebra AU? If Zebra AU sits still, it does not consume CPU - as far as I have recognized. Zebra VST seems to consume even if not playing.
Best
might it be that Zebra VST consumes more CPU than Zebra AU? If Zebra AU sits still, it does not consume CPU - as far as I have recognized. Zebra VST seems to consume even if not playing.
Best
- u-he
- 30209 posts since 8 Aug, 2002 from Berlin
Hey Steffe,
nope, they're both identical in code. The cpu usage in standby is related to the effects used in the FX Grid. They still don't follow into standby when there's nothing to process. Which is one of the things on the slowly shrinking to do list
Cheers,
Urs
nope, they're both identical in code. The cpu usage in standby is related to the effects used in the FX Grid. They still don't follow into standby when there's nothing to process. Which is one of the things on the slowly shrinking to do list
Cheers,

