64 Bit Summing?
- KVRAF
- 9600 posts since 17 Sep, 2002 from Gothenburg Sweden
-
- KVRAF
- 1600 posts since 1 Apr, 2003 from Seattle, WA
-
- KVRAF
- 6490 posts since 14 Jun, 2004 from Rochester, NY
no but its 64 bit mixing not summing. JK LOLS
seriously how cool is 64 bit summing?
RonC

seriously how cool is 64 bit summing?
RonC
Last edited by rpc9943 on Tue Feb 14, 2006 10:28 pm, edited 2 times in total.
- KVRAF
- 9600 posts since 17 Sep, 2002 from Gothenburg Sweden
I assume you're joking (use smilies for gods sake
)
but if you're not mixing and summing is the same.
How cool 64 bit mixing is ? Well i'm not wetting myself.
but if you're not mixing and summing is the same.
How cool 64 bit mixing is ? Well i'm not wetting myself.
- KVRAF
- 9600 posts since 17 Sep, 2002 from Gothenburg Sweden
There is no reason. If you have the choice.voidar wrote:Why say no to maximum precision if you can afford it?
I use another host and 64 bit summing initself isn't a good enough reason for me to switch host.
That's what i meant.
-
- KVRian
- 520 posts since 11 Sep, 2003 from Berlin, Germany
Even an 8-bit CPU can add 64bit values (it just takes longer).
The only real advante of 64bit CPUs is the increased address-space, so you can have more RAM without dodgy trickery.
The only real advante of 64bit CPUs is the increased address-space, so you can have more RAM without dodgy trickery.
-
- KVRAF
- 2417 posts since 17 Jun, 2003
That's a bit like saying the only benefit a Ferrari has over a Robin Reliant is that it's got a better paintjob.
Think i'd rather have an A64 based box than a zx spectrum, and whether it can have more RAM without dodgy trickery isn't the reason.
Think i'd rather have an A64 based box than a zx spectrum, and whether it can have more RAM without dodgy trickery isn't the reason.
"my gosh it's a friggin hardware"
- KVRAF
- 9600 posts since 17 Sep, 2002 from Gothenburg Sweden
And tonight on the Late show, we play "Lets make an unfair comparison"
chico.co.uk wrote:That's a bit like saying the only benefit a Ferrari has over a Robin Reliant is that it's got a better paintjob.
Think i'd rather have an A64 based box than a zx spectrum, and whether it can have more RAM without dodgy trickery isn't the reason.
-
- KVRian
- 520 posts since 11 Sep, 2003 from Berlin, Germany
I wasn't comparing 8bit to 64bit. That was only my answer to the question if you would need a 64bit CPU to do 64bit summing.chico.co.uk wrote:That's a bit like saying the only benefit a Ferrari has over a Robin Reliant is that it's got a better paintjob.
Think i'd rather have an A64 based box than a zx spectrum, and whether it can have more RAM without dodgy trickery isn't the reason.
I WAS comparing 32bit to 64bit CPUs, which does not involve performance increases if you are not processing 64bit data.
I have an Athlon64 X2 4400+ so don't tell me it's better than my C64.
And since I'm running a 32bit OS on it it might just aswell be a 32bit CPU and be just as fast.
-
- KVRAF
- 2417 posts since 17 Jun, 2003
Sorry, i was joking
(I should really do more smilies, but i tend to deadpan in real life, so i don't bother on forums either. Should have learned by now it doesn't come across too well ...)
I just thought the "Even an 8-bit CPU can add 64bit values (it just takes longer)" line was funny, that's all. It was the bit about "it just takes longer" that i thought was brilliantly understated. Hence the robin reliant/ferrari thingy
I just thought the "Even an 8-bit CPU can add 64bit values (it just takes longer)" line was funny, that's all. It was the bit about "it just takes longer" that i thought was brilliantly understated. Hence the robin reliant/ferrari thingy
"my gosh it's a friggin hardware"
-
- KVRAF
- 6490 posts since 14 Jun, 2004 from Rochester, NY
