One more reason a mixer would be nice...

[pHz]

preposterous, do not "BeGit" me, flounderous ponce! Aback!
btw, wtf.
i was saying why not use all our external plugin tools that are available? thats what im saying.
RONQ

why not just use a host with a mixer im saying ???

(quality ronglish post there BTW !!! )

slainte rob

[FoxV]

preposterous, do not "BeGit" me, flounderous ponce! Aback!

LOL! Priceless!!!!

(Though, not that I'm an expert in Ronglish, but I think the word should be founderous?? But I will defer to the Ronglish scholars who frequent this board, and--of course--the master himself!)

[rpc9943]

Flounderous

FRonCs

[rpc9943]

also,

to be honest i see no difference between what we have now and a mixer. wtf.

RonC

[pHz]

also,
to be honest i see no difference between what we have now and a mixer. wtf.
RonC

welcome to the dark side ron ...

slainte rob

[spacefox]

OK, how about this for a "almost a mixer but still true to The Tracktion Spirit (TM)" idea:

For the purposes of this post: "mixer filters" = Vol/ Pan; T's EQ; Volume Meter

1. When you select a mixer filter, it show in the properties panel, just like now BUT the display should be made more compact, so it will take as little space as possible, without losing clarity.
2. When you multiselect several filters, they are displayed inm the properties panel in a way similar to a traditional mixer*, and grouped by tracks. This way you can have a mixer for one track, or several, and containing only what you want and use.

* One filter below the other, in the same order they are on the track.

Problem:
1) for lack of Photoshop skills, this idea will be ignored. Anyone willing to make a mock-up? Rock?
2)Display can get crowded.

Improvements:
* To simplify things, filters could be auto-selected every time you select a track (optional)
* There could be a hotkey that select all relevant filters and display them
* Properties panel can be made resizable, for semi-full screen mixer.

OK, Im totally anti a Mixer, I mix with my ears not my eye's...But this makes sense, as much as I don't want need a mixer, and would much rather have a hardware interface for my ears, This still seems like it would be really usefull in the Pre-Mix general level setting stage, not to mention if you could control a panning all at once, I tend to want to quick pan groups of tracks at once more than set volumes!!!

That was the idea, basically. Just to have a more onvinient display of T's own mixer components - nicely grouped together. Being a Tracktioneer, born and raised, I never cared for a traditioal mixer either.

[Lunch Money]

Ron, I just meant your comment to Rock.

Greg,
Flounderous Ponce

[djsubject]

##EDIT:

BAHHH

to much stress for one post

i decline

Subz

[rpc9943]

what gose around cum around u kno?

at least im noy dizlecik didge deedj sobjekt lol rol lolso roll eye

that stupid u the only 1 hoo h8 it lols

PS. JK, DJ I *heart* you bro kiss kiss kiss

RON

[Lunch Money]

Bruuutal, Ron. That's 2 people I respect that you've insulted in the short span of 1 thread! You need to check your head today, because I know you're not always this way.

Greg

[jplanet]

That's it, I didn't want a mixer before, now I want one just because the people who don't are being such wankers about it!

[Lunch Money]

[djsubject]

Bruuutal, Ron. That's 2 people I respect that you've insulted in the short span of 1 thread! You need to check your head today, because I know you're not always this way.

Greg

dont worry i find it funny

you know like when a black comeden dose a joke with a white guy in & thay do the nerdy usa chump voice & he allways sounds gay (eddie merphie dose it best IMO)

i just have to larf, even though the joke's on me


sorry if what i posted upset you ron! i was only agreeing with lunch money that your dig at rock was most stupid


get well soon ron

Subz