Need realistic reverb to i.e. synthesize distant gunfire.
-
- KVRAF
- 1871 posts since 17 May, 2005
For an audiotrack for a wargame i'm in need of a reverb that does realistic outdoor enviroments, or a combination of effects to archieve that sound. I'm ok in the filtering and dynamic shaping department, but the actual 'cracking echoes' that i would like to add to distant gunfire i can't seem to get right.
What would be the best reverb for me?
What would be the best reverb for me?
- KVRAF
- 6478 posts since 16 Dec, 2002
Have you tried convolution reverbs?
There is a good free one called SIR, or the commercial (but superior) Voxengo pristine space.
Then download these absolutely brilliant free impulse sets,
VSS3 set here
http://www.echochamber.ch/responses/index.html
Lexicon L960 here:
http://www.noisevault.com/index.php?opt ... t=category
Those sets will very likely have what you're looking for. Especially the VSS3 set. They are free, but impulses don't really get better than that.
You probably want a delay-reverb type of sound for those echoes.
There is a good free one called SIR, or the commercial (but superior) Voxengo pristine space.
Then download these absolutely brilliant free impulse sets,
VSS3 set here
http://www.echochamber.ch/responses/index.html
Lexicon L960 here:
http://www.noisevault.com/index.php?opt ... t=category
Those sets will very likely have what you're looking for. Especially the VSS3 set. They are free, but impulses don't really get better than that.
You probably want a delay-reverb type of sound for those echoes.
-
- Banned
- 1842 posts since 4 Aug, 2004 from just right here
There are other lexicon ones that would work whith your ones at Noisevault Kingston.
Theres lexicon - MPX500, 91, 90, 81, 70, 60. There is a 480L floating about if your quick enough(long post here somewhere)
Theres lexicon - MPX500, 91, 90, 81, 70, 60. There is a 480L floating about if your quick enough(long post here somewhere)
- KVRAF
- 6478 posts since 16 Dec, 2002
Rangtangtang,
I've done quite extensive testing with the noisevault stuff and have concluded that apart from that 960 set (and very few others), it's all shit.
Hence the recommendation. Just trying to save him some time.
I've done quite extensive testing with the noisevault stuff and have concluded that apart from that 960 set (and very few others), it's all shit.
Hence the recommendation. Just trying to save him some time.
-
- Banned
- 1842 posts since 4 Aug, 2004 from just right here
I agree Kingston, there not all that good but your lucky to get those ones. Unless you make your own?
-
- KVRAF
- 2208 posts since 13 May, 2005
Sounds like a job for the Lexicon "wild spaces" department. Or an impulse of a real forest or street...
-
- KVRian
- 1394 posts since 28 Mar, 2002 from Austria
You could also try RaySpace
-
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 1871 posts since 17 May, 2005
Thank you for your replies, very useful information. I'm new to Impulse effects to be honest.. but it's time i get into that so thanks for 'filtering' out the good vs bad there Kingston. That Lexicon 960 sure looks like it could be the one. Hopefully tonight i can testdrive SIR with some impulses. Raytrace i will also try, cheers Peter.
I wouldn't have found these sources without all your help so thanks again!
zeep
I wouldn't have found these sources without all your help so thanks again!
zeep
-
- KVRian
- 831 posts since 7 Sep, 2004
Do not forget to experiment with delays (+reverb)!
-
- KVRian
- 520 posts since 13 Aug, 2002 from Salzburg, Austria
Barbarossa is right. You need lots or early reflections coming from mountains, as I see, you're searching for that "thunder" (cascading) reverb effect, right?
I don't know if there is an IR that does this.
I don't know if there is an IR that does this.
- KVRAF
- 6478 posts since 16 Dec, 2002
There is,Spyro wrote:I don't know if there is an IR that does this.
I already mentioned where. They can be found in my first post.
-
- KVRAF
- 3499 posts since 9 Oct, 2004 from Poland
Keep in mind that the sonic crack can be a major part (depending on the listener position even more than 90%) of a distant gunfire sound (if the firearm uses supersonic ammo).
So if You have only muzzle blast samples, no reverb will make your distant gunfire sound realistic enough (for me).
So if You have only muzzle blast samples, no reverb will make your distant gunfire sound realistic enough (for me).
[====[\\\\\\\\]>------,
Ay caramba !
Ay caramba !
-
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 1871 posts since 17 May, 2005
Kingston, right now i'm trying the impulse sets. So far i tried them in soundforge but i'm not too happy with the sound so i'm going to try another host/reverb later today. The impulses are impressive though, There's even a ricochet effect in there as you said.
Mutant, it's the sonic crack that's giving me the most trouble for now. The reverbs understandably do not emulate that. For now i'm using some filter envelopes to make a similar effect, they sort of work, but it's not the realistic crack i want. If you have an idea, shoot!
Mutant, it's the sonic crack that's giving me the most trouble for now. The reverbs understandably do not emulate that. For now i'm using some filter envelopes to make a similar effect, they sort of work, but it's not the realistic crack i want. If you have an idea, shoot!
-
AdmiralQuality AdmiralQuality https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=83902
- Banned
- 6657 posts since 10 Oct, 2005 from Toronto, Canada
-
- KVRAF
- 3499 posts since 9 Oct, 2004 from Poland
Some very interesting data on muzzle blast & sonic cracks.zeep wrote:Mutant, it's the sonic crack that's giving me the most trouble for now. The reverbs understandably do not emulate that. For now i'm using some filter envelopes to make a similar effect, they sort of work, but it's not the realistic crack i want. If you have an idea, shoot!
Almost 140dB at 10M from the bullet:
http://guns.connect.fi/rs/bulnoise.html
[====[\\\\\\\\]>------,
Ay caramba !
Ay caramba !

