how many posihfopit EQ plugins can you run on your system ?
- KVRAF
- 6478 posts since 16 Dec, 2002
My benchmarker nerd alterego got the best out of me, and its curiosity won.
51 instances with 2048 sample buffer (my mixing setting)
37 instances with 128 sample buffer (my composing setting)
nothing surprising there.
Cubase SX3
AMD Athlon X2 +4400 (at 2.4ghz), RME HDSP soundcard.
51 instances with 2048 sample buffer (my mixing setting)
37 instances with 128 sample buffer (my composing setting)
nothing surprising there.
Cubase SX3
AMD Athlon X2 +4400 (at 2.4ghz), RME HDSP soundcard.
-
- KVRAF
- 5851 posts since 9 Jul, 2002 from Helsinki
I agree. Ok, my CPU needs are modest (I could imagine using maybe 2 poshifopits in a real project!) so I'm fine with the performance, and this is thin&light laptop anyway.cym0n wrote:my recent experience with an intel cpu tells me they defenetly underperform with almnost every vst. not just posihfopit.
not to mention denormal problems which still aplly to even the newest intel cpus...
for vst work amd give better performance. not even a doubt about that.
But the denormal issues are a real PITA.
-
- KVRist
- 50 posts since 27 Feb, 2006
true.pakana wrote:I agree. Ok, my CPU needs are modest (I could imagine using maybe 2 poshifopits in a real project!) so I'm fine with the performance, and this is thin&light laptop anyway.cym0n wrote:my recent experience with an intel cpu tells me they defenetly underperform with almnost every vst. not just posihfopit.
not to mention denormal problems which still aplly to even the newest intel cpus...
for vst work amd give better performance. not even a doubt about that.
But the denormal issues are a real PITA.
I actually bought a centrino laptop(latest dothan processor) after reading on these forums they were not prone to denormal. the truth is nothing has changed in intel cpus architectiure to avoid denormals.
so u just gotta hope the developer of each plugin has taken care of this.
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 210 posts since 23 Feb, 2005
I have edirol FA-66 (firewire) and even when I change the latency nothing happens same cpu load same everything ?
Any idea why ?
Any idea why ?
- KVRAF
- 6478 posts since 16 Dec, 2002
blame edirol drivers. Or maybe they are quite efficient on all buffer settings? 
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 210 posts since 23 Feb, 2005
3ms 7ms 12ms all have the same pressure.
