Don't get me wrong, I'm not a big fan of dongles, and that may be true; but keep in mind that was written by people who crack software and has never been proven. It could have simply been retribution to Steinberg for making a protection system that was so hard to crack!grymmjack wrote:pfft. A dongle required for a demo. What's next, renting a dongle?
Do people realize that the dongle protection code eats their CPU? I read somewhere that the cubase dongle code was like 50% of the code in cubase or something which ate like tons of CPU. What a waste, and as a paying Cubase customer it was enough to make me switch away from cubase to something else not dongled (T2)...
Don't these bloodsucking companies understand that when users move away from their product they lose money that they could have had from devout user staying loyal and upgrading year after year after year?
Idiots..
But I would be happiest in a dongle-less world too.
