inbeLievble! steinberg cubas sx4 !

[bduffy]

hallo!

I did said from beginning is't fake..
I invented it's fake!!
the evry first one I aws and found out that its fake..
why not listen to me inventor of its' fake and go speuclate?
liste to me and read to me guy.. I invent and find any haox and fakes in minute

bye

You, sir, are an idiot.

[Muzik 4 Machines]

I love it: this thread is like the opening scene of "The Party" (for those of you who've seen it), where you think he's dead, but he keeps coming back up for one more toot on his horn, then he's shot again.

and_if_this_thread_continues_longer,it_will_all_feel_like_the_party...

[Donnie Darko Brasco]

You, sir, are an idiot.

waht wrong wit you?
I tell only truth.. read the beginning of this tread and hwo said what..
dont get insulting, oky?

[bduffy]

You, sir, are an idiot.

waht wrong wit you?
I tell only truth.. read the beginning of this tread and hwo said what..
dont get insulting, oky?

That's not what you said at the beginning of the thread. You said "I not believe it's real" - it does not sound like you made it.

[Donnie Darko Brasco]

when I said I made it??
I say I inventor of its' fakerness!

[jackson]

Dude, lay off the novacaine!

[bduffy]

Sorry, Donnie. I don't buy it. You're just being silly and you know it.

[Donnie Darko Brasco]

what nocaine? eh?
next come whit: "dude dont crack taht smoke" or
"what is yxour drug, i need too" or
"man, how bout terapy?"
I tell what i tell and it real true and don matter waht you say, U cannot convince me! there it is wirtten at beginning, ah!

[kritikon]

Oh and can't you just hide the MIDI channels? I never use 'em either, but I just hide them right away in all my Templates and all my Mixer Views.

Yeah, you can hide those channels...but I find the inspector a tedious way of doing some things too, so for midi channels, I use the mixer. e.g. on my version of SX (2.2.something), if you solo a midi channel, sometimes it doesn't always solo the associated audio channel. For the audio channels of a VSTi, I have to open 2 of the subchannels (automation channels) to be able to fire up a channel view from the inspector - the 1st channel (which defaults to volume) if I try the inspector, it still only gives me the midi options, not the audio channel.

So it's just a personal workflow thing...the inspector ticks me off, so I try to work with the mixer...but then the mixer ticks me off too...catch 22. I really am trying to get used to the inspector, I am...but I always end up with way too many channels shown for comfort, and I don't like the way it shortens the arrangement view; So I end up having to hide midi channels, then unhide them when I want to change the VSTi or whatever. Nothing I can't deal with, but it often seems so...inelegant?

[bduffy]

Oh and can't you just hide the MIDI channels? I never use 'em either, but I just hide them right away in all my Templates and all my Mixer Views.

Yeah, you can hide those channels...but I find the inspector a tedious way of doing some things too, so for midi channels, I use the mixer. e.g. on my version of SX (2.2.something), if you solo a midi channel, sometimes it doesn't always solo the associated audio channel. For the audio channels of a VSTi, I have to open 2 of the subchannels (automation channels) to be able to fire up a channel view from the inspector - the 1st channel (which defaults to volume) if I try the inspector, it still only gives me the midi options, not the audio channel.

So it's just a personal workflow thing...the inspector ticks me off, so I try to work with the mixer...but then the mixer ticks me off too...catch 22. I really am trying to get used to the inspector, I am...but I always end up with way too many channels shown for comfort, and I don't like the way it shortens the arrangement view; So I end up having to hide midi channels, then unhide them when I want to change the VSTi or whatever. Nothing I can't deal with, but it often seems so...inelegant?

Yeah, see, I spend a lot of time in the Inspector. SX 3 has 2.2 beat in that you just have to single-click the inspector, and it expands; much faster. Whoever thought of dbl-clicking on a 2px X 8px box to expand the inspector is nuts. And soloing FX Channels! URGH!

Anyway, these are the little bithcy things that need to be improved. But we'll probably get some mLan/Time-Blasto thingy first...

[jens]

So keep dreaming, whoever of you refuse to believe it's not a hoax.

so you say it's not? - I thought it was...


(these double negations are tricky sometimes, aren't they? )

[bduffy]

So keep dreaming, whoever of you refuse to believe it's not a hoax.

so you say it's not? - I thought it was...


(these double negations are tricky sometimes, aren't they? )

Aren't they not indeed!

[jens]

nope, they aren't indeed not in no way... er... or so...

[bduffy]

Man - is this the Worst Thread of the Year or what?

[Kingston]

So keep dreaming, whoever of you refuse to believe it's not a hoax.

so you say it's not? - I thought it was...


(these double negations are tricky sometimes, aren't they? )

yeah, reading it now it looks a tricky sentence. What I meant is that, yes, it was clearly a hoax from the get go, and those who believe it's real are either dreamers, or idiots.



What I find especially funny (well sad really) is that even after the creator of the document exposed himself at cubase.net, some people *still* think it might be real.

Interweb idiotism at it's best.