Kjaerhus GPP-1 or MPL-1 ?
-
- KVRer
- 13 posts since 11 May, 2006 from Canada
Kjaerhus GPP-1 or MPL-1 ?
Which one is your favorite limiter and why ?
Which one is your favorite limiter and why ?
- KVRAF
- 5913 posts since 17 Aug, 2004 from Berlin, Germany
GPP is not so ideal for loudness stuff, is more a transientcompressor/limiter ("Peak Compressor").
MPL is IMHO the best VST-limiter on the market. It can help to make the sound loud and preserve the orginalsound as much as possible. It sounds very transparent and make the sound more "open" then other limiters.
For a limiter I go for MPL. For GPP I have no usage, I would use a compressor (eg. the GUP) insted with moderate settings.
MPL is IMHO the best VST-limiter on the market. It can help to make the sound loud and preserve the orginalsound as much as possible. It sounds very transparent and make the sound more "open" then other limiters.
For a limiter I go for MPL. For GPP I have no usage, I would use a compressor (eg. the GUP) insted with moderate settings.
| Links-
- KVRist
- 236 posts since 12 Sep, 2005
Was using Isotope Ozone's limiter for a while...but recently tried the MPL. And true enough the MPL is better. Hard to describe, but it's plain better.
Try to hear the test/diff among other limiters here http://www.kjaerhusaudio.com/mp3/limitertest.mp3
Then send a private email to the comapny and I'm sure they would be more than willing to share the brand of the competing limiters used in the tests
Try to hear the test/diff among other limiters here http://www.kjaerhusaudio.com/mp3/limitertest.mp3
Then send a private email to the comapny and I'm sure they would be more than willing to share the brand of the competing limiters used in the tests
Warm regards,
- Jess
Win XP SP2
Cubase SX 3.1.1
- Jess
Win XP SP2
Cubase SX 3.1.1
-
- KVRer
- Topic Starter
- 13 posts since 11 May, 2006 from Canada
Voxengo Elephant is the best mastering limiterjess123 wrote:recently tried the MPL. And true enough the MPL is better. Hard to describe, but it's plain better.
-
- KVRist
- 166 posts since 23 Feb, 2006
I have both Elephant and MPL-1. They are both excellent, and very, very different. You need both imo. Try the demos, on different types of material. Elephant is better for punchy drums, imo, because it deals with fast transients better. The MPL-1 is more like a Leveller, much smoother, but tends to duck the sound so drums become more squishy than punchy.
I think both are must-have.
I think both are must-have.
-
- KVRist
- 478 posts since 14 Jan, 2003 from Denmark
Howdy!
The MPL-1 can easily handle transient material but you must do a little tweeking
Here are a few presets: Hot | Clipper | Soft Limiting
I know that many people like to use the MPL-1 on tracks as well because of its low CPU usage but I still think the GPP-1 is a overall better choice on tracks because it got soft variable knee, little latency, can sound warmer etc.
Cheers
Torben
The MPL-1 can easily handle transient material but you must do a little tweeking
Here are a few presets: Hot | Clipper | Soft Limiting
I know that many people like to use the MPL-1 on tracks as well because of its low CPU usage but I still think the GPP-1 is a overall better choice on tracks because it got soft variable knee, little latency, can sound warmer etc.
Cheers
Torben
-
- KVRAF
- 2049 posts since 18 Sep, 2003 from Seattle USA
Hi Torben, How do I get MPL-1 to accept kpa file (presets above are kpa). Thanks!Torben wrote:Howdy!
The MPL-1 can easily handle transient material but you must do a little tweeking
Here are a few presets: Hot | Clipper | Soft Limiting
I know that many people like to use the MPL-1 on tracks as well because of its low CPU usage but I still think the GPP-1 is a overall better choice on tracks because it got soft variable knee, little latency, can sound warmer etc.
Cheers
Torben
-
- KVRist
- 478 posts since 14 Jan, 2003 from Denmark
-
- KVRist
- 478 posts since 14 Jan, 2003 from Denmark
As M'Snah suggested; press Load.
This was odd. I was actually answering your last post but my answer was not there. Hmm. Maybe the forum doesn't like if two people submits at the exact same time
Torben
This was odd. I was actually answering your last post but my answer was not there. Hmm. Maybe the forum doesn't like if two people submits at the exact same time
Torben
Last edited by Torben on Mon Jul 17, 2006 4:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- KVRAF
- 2049 posts since 18 Sep, 2003 from Seattle USA
Thank you! I see it in the manual now that you mentioned it. Shoulda read the fine print first...M'Snah wrote:Click the "Load" button, in the middle of the row of buttons (between 'Preset' and 'Save')
Programs and banks can be saved to file. We use a proprietary file format with ".kpa" extension for programs and ".kpb" extension for banks.
-
- KVRist
- 236 posts since 12 Sep, 2005
Hi guys, was wondering which is the recommended preset suitable to emulate commercial mix for pop and rock/metal tunes?Torben wrote:Howdy!
The MPL-1 can easily handle transient material but you must do a little tweeking
Here are a few presets: Hot | Clipper | Soft Limiting
I know that many people like to use the MPL-1 on tracks as well because of its low CPU usage but I still think the GPP-1 is a overall better choice on tracks because it got soft variable knee, little latency, can sound warmer etc.
Cheers
Torben
Warm regards,
- Jess
Win XP SP2
Cubase SX 3.1.1
- Jess
Win XP SP2
Cubase SX 3.1.1
