Nativi Instruments Guitar Rig 2 - is awesome!!

VST, AU, AAX, CLAP, etc. Plugin Virtual Effects Discussion
Post Reply New Topic
RELATED
PRODUCTS

Post

Jason Brian Merrill wrote:
Hink wrote:
Jason Brian Merrill wrote:
Hink wrote:
Jason Brian Merrill wrote:Lets all remember, a podxt is basically software with its own DSP chip.

It just barely qualifies as "hardware" any more than a computer with an amp sim on it.
it provides it's own processing...that's like saying digital reverbs/delays/multi fx, rackmount units aren't harware because they have a dsp chip...me thinx you spoke before you thunk...;)
nah, i feel similar about those too. ;)
:lol: I can think of a few million that might disagree...in fact some might say that "hardware processors" didn't really come into thier own umtil the invention of the dsp chip :hihi:
good for them....
then I suggest that all electronic amps (tubes, solidstate. microprocessor, telekenectronics) are just parabolic continuum emulators or sims :wink:
The highest form of knowledge is empathy, for it requires us to suspend our egos and live in another's world. It requires profound, purpose‐larger‐than‐the‐self kind of understanding.

Post

Im just saying that the capabilities of software guitar sims are equal to that of the so called "hardware" sims.

Because essentially, they are simply code with a DSP chip.

Same thing with the reverbs, delays -- whatever.

Now with pc power becoming even stronger, they can do the same job.

think what you wish, you are entitled to that.
check my profile for contact info.
msn messenger is my email as well.

Post

Hink wrote:
Jason Brian Merrill wrote:
Hink wrote:
Jason Brian Merrill wrote:
Hink wrote:
Jason Brian Merrill wrote:Lets all remember, a podxt is basically software with its own DSP chip.

It just barely qualifies as "hardware" any more than a computer with an amp sim on it.
it provides it's own processing...that's like saying digital reverbs/delays/multi fx, rackmount units aren't harware because they have a dsp chip...me thinx you spoke before you thunk...;)
nah, i feel similar about those too. ;)
:lol: I can think of a few million that might disagree...in fact some might say that "hardware processors" didn't really come into thier own umtil the invention of the dsp chip :hihi:
good for them....
then I suggest that all electronic amps (tubes, solidstate. microprocessor, telekenectronics) are just parabolic continuum emulators or sims :wink:
good for you ;)
check my profile for contact info.
msn messenger is my email as well.

Post

Jason Brian Merrill wrote:
Hink wrote:
Jason Brian Merrill wrote:
Hink wrote:
Jason Brian Merrill wrote:
Hink wrote: it provides it's own processing...that's like saying digital reverbs/delays/multi fx, rackmount units aren't harware because they have a dsp chip...me thinx you spoke before you thunk...;)
nah, i feel similar about those too. ;)
:lol: I can think of a few million that might disagree...in fact some might say that "hardware processors" didn't really come into thier own umtil the invention of the dsp chip :hihi:
good for them....
then I suggest that all electronic amps (tubes, solidstate. microprocessor, telekenectronics) are just parabolic continuum emulators or sims :wink:
good for you ;)

does that mean you understand what I just said?
















































































































































If so can you explain it to me :hihi:
The highest form of knowledge is empathy, for it requires us to suspend our egos and live in another's world. It requires profound, purpose‐larger‐than‐the‐self kind of understanding.

Post

It means, no offense, i dont give a crap what you said ;)
check my profile for contact info.
msn messenger is my email as well.

Post

Jason Brian Merrill wrote:It means, no offense, i dont give a crap what you said ;)
meow :roll:
The highest form of knowledge is empathy, for it requires us to suspend our egos and live in another's world. It requires profound, purpose‐larger‐than‐the‐self kind of understanding.

Post

Hink wrote:
Jason Brian Merrill wrote:It means, no offense, i dont give a crap what you said ;)
meow :roll:
well, its true, i dont ;) whereas normally i do :D
check my profile for contact info.
msn messenger is my email as well.

Post

@Jason:

Hink is right, you need to do your research first, bro

Modern DSP chip beats modern CPU when it comes to audio processing and it will probably stay this way (since Moore's law is dead)

ps. Having said that, I'd always take the software route.... Only 'cos it's generally cheaper and upgradable
Last edited by DaveSmom on Sat Jun 03, 2006 5:36 am, edited 1 time in total.

Post

DaveSmom wrote:@Jason:

Hink is right, you need to do your research first, bro

Modern DSP chip beats modern CPU when it comes to audio and it will probably stay this way (since Moore's law is dead)
Nah, i dont think so, bro.

Esp. when we are talking about these guitar amp sims from the early 2000s ...
check my profile for contact info.
msn messenger is my email as well.

Post

[sarcasm]I guess you can't teach a fool :)[/sarcasm]

Post

DaveSmom wrote:[sarcasm]I guess you can't teach a fool :)[/sarcasm]
perhaps then, you can give me stats regarding the processing power of the podxt, vs. a modern, dual core 64 bit CPU?
check my profile for contact info.
msn messenger is my email as well.

Post

DaveSmom wrote:
ps. Having said that, I'd always take the software route.... Only 'cos it's generally cheaper and upgradable
not to counter my own argument, but i own the podxt, and i love it -- and it is VERY upgradable. However, the DSP chip is limited, and many complain of aliasing in some patches ....

and i dont feel it is as "Alive" as guitar rig 2 ;)
check my profile for contact info.
msn messenger is my email as well.

Post

From Google, your global library:

eg1: http://members.tripod.com/kmi9000/kmi_proc.htm

There are millions of others, I'm sure ;)

Enjoy

Post

DaveSmom wrote:From Google, your global library:

eg1: http://members.tripod.com/kmi9000/kmi_proc.htm

There are millions of others, I'm sure ;)

Enjoy
Umm, Im not reading that crap.

perhaps though, you can answer my question -- which was really the only thing in question.

does the podxt have more processing power than a modern cpu?

i think not.

A 5 year old DSP chip is not going to even compare to a modern CPU.

Hence, a pc running guitar rig or amplitube 2 actually has potential to sound much better, have more calcs per second in its emulation, than the podxt of the past ;)

im not saying as a blanket statement dsp chips are weaker -- but we're talking 2 different eras here.

give me proof, in english, and perhaps ill give a crap what you say. :oops:
Last edited by Jason Brian Merrill on Sat Jun 03, 2006 6:03 am, edited 2 times in total.
check my profile for contact info.
msn messenger is my email as well.

Post

Ahh... I see your bias showing

Discussion over from this end, mate

Post Reply

Return to “Effects”