FL Studio has had curved automation clips since v5, that speeded up my workflow immensely. I was quite shocked when I found that Live, being very clip oriented, doesn't have preset automation clips (curved or otherwise).diverdee wrote:Curve tools like logics or podiums (I think) would be nice - just that little ease of use factor.
Live 6 Rumours?
-
- KVRist
- 371 posts since 26 May, 2005
-
- Banned
- 2631 posts since 12 Oct, 2005 from the garden state
I'm afraid you might be outnumberd by people who need over 128 automatable parameters to finish a tunethe_viirus wrote: now what i hope is there being a large enough group of "people like me" that can make this a viable option for monolake and his team.
- KVRAF
- 2744 posts since 5 Dec, 2003 from Harlan's World
Can't you just stay with Live Lite then?the_viirus wrote:one for those like me who are still on live 4 lite because it is simpler, at the cost of less new features. i dont want track folders, i dont want a freeze feature, i dont want rewire support, i dont want separate automation channels, i dont want video support, and i dont want this retrograde to come at the cost of more CPU and memory when the existing live 4 version does the trick perfectly.
My Soundcloud Too many pieces of music finish far too long after the end. - Stravinsky
-
- KVRAF
- 7489 posts since 6 Jul, 2004
opia wrote:I'm afraid you might be outnumberd by people who need over 128 automatable parameters to finish a tune
-
- KVRist
- 320 posts since 13 Mar, 2005 from HELL
- KVRAF
- 2744 posts since 5 Dec, 2003 from Harlan's World
Then just use what you need in the full version. I think creating two versions would inevitably force the price for the full version to go up.the_viirus wrote:some of the restrictions are a little tight.kovacs wrote:Can't you just stay with Live Lite then?
cannot assign midi parameters.
cannot use midi sync.
maximum of...
2 unique clip automations.
2 plug-ins (one vst, one vsti)
4 scenes
1 send/return channel
it takes work to work around them.
My Soundcloud Too many pieces of music finish far too long after the end. - Stravinsky
-
- KVRist
- 398 posts since 25 Apr, 2002 from Chula Vista, CA
I think it's different eyes. My eyes will be 55 in 18 days and I have a real problem reading anything in print now. The screen is much more clear and I can zoom to whatever I need to. It's not fatiguing to me at all. I know your comment wasn't directed at me, but since I have eyes that qualify as old, I wanted to add my 2 cents.Beardedone wrote:Don't you find reading text on screen fatiguing? I find it gives me headaches after 5 minutes. Young eyes I guess.I really don't like printed manuals, I prefer having everything on screen.
-
- KVRAF
- 5350 posts since 8 Aug, 2003 from Berlin Germany
Yes, but no one has respondedheadquest wrote:That sounds like an awesome way to do this - very Ableton.soma wrote:My Wishes:
Create "Group" from track selection
A nice mixing feature would be to select several tracks then right click and select group. Then the tracks would all send their output to a new audio track called "Group 1". The tracks would all get moved next to each other and and the "group" could be expanded or collapsed to show/hide the group's children tracks. Group tracks could have their own scenes that play all the clips in the group's row.
This is bascially an encapsulation idea for all you OO heads out there. It's a bit like a folder track for all you conventional types. Actaully the ability to click-shrink/click-expand any track in the session view would help too.![]()
Have you suggested it on the official FR forum?
-
- KVRAF
- 4878 posts since 13 Jun, 2002 from Montreal
Interesting. Despite the fact that I prefer reading in bed or recling on a sofa reading on screen is jsu not comfortable. And I am curious as to how you zoom? Is this possible in windows XP?Beardedone wrote:
Quote:
I really don't like printed manuals, I prefer having everything on screen.
Don't you find reading text on screen fatiguing? I find it gives me headaches after 5 minutes. Young eyes I guess.
I think it's different eyes. My eyes will be 55 in 18 days and I have a real problem reading anything in print now. The screen is much more clear and I can zoom to whatever I need to. It's not fatiguing to me at all. I know your comment wasn't directed at me, but since I have eyes that qualify as old, I wanted to add my 2 cents.
- KVRAF
- 2744 posts since 5 Dec, 2003 from Harlan's World
I read books on my Palm Tungsten E handheld all the time...it's great! But that's fiction mostly, not user guides and manuals etc...Beardedone wrote:Interesting. Despite the fact that I prefer reading in bed or recling on a sofa reading on screen is jsu not comfortable. And I am curious as to how you zoom? Is this possible in windows XP?I think it's different eyes. My eyes will be 55 in 18 days and I have a real problem reading anything in print now. The screen is much more clear and I can zoom to whatever I need to. It's not fatiguing to me at all. I know your comment wasn't directed at me, but since I have eyes that qualify as old, I wanted to add my 2 cents.
I do find that I tend to print out large manuals and end up never using the printout...
My Soundcloud Too many pieces of music finish far too long after the end. - Stravinsky
-
- KVRist
- 109 posts since 29 Jan, 2006 from Galway, Ireland
I think for me its handier coz I like to flick to sections at the click of a button (and I like the links to other sections that the pdf version has). I find it alot quicker and leaves me with less stuff cluttering my desk. But thats just me. I didn't mean to suggest that they shouldn't release a print version. Obviously having both available makes more sense for them and us.Beardedone wrote:Don't you find reading text on screen fatiguing? I find it gives me headaches after 5 minutes. Young eyes I guess.
Yeah it sounds like we're both talkin bout the same thing for sure, so yeah, that is possible what ur looking for. I could be wrong. I've never had cause to use that feature coz I find it faster to cut and paste (or dupicate ..Ctrl+D) but I know for sure theres offsets available in that way for pitch and stuff like that coz it was in one of the built in tutorials.sinkmusic wrote:i was thinking more in being able to reorganize sample slices in horizontal mode (for example : taking the end of a sample, repeating it 4 times, then taking the first half and repeating it 2 times, etc. Like i often do in Acid).
I hear ya. Although I've heard form people who use various programs that Live's algorithyms are second to none (but I can't say from personal experience). If that is the case we might not get that huge an improvement on that front. But lets seeSynthbuilder wrote:Fix the bug of tempo changes affecting playback of clips
Again, I may be mis-readin coz i'm not to good with words but is that different from deactivating a clip using the right click menu (don't know bout mac)Synthbuilder wrote:A command to mute clips in arrange window without muting the whole track. Like Cubase.
That would be quite handySynthbuilder wrote:Bezier style curves in automation
-
- KVRAF
- 4878 posts since 13 Jun, 2002 from Montreal
-
- KVRist
- 109 posts since 29 Jan, 2006 from Galway, Ireland
-
- KVRAF
- 4878 posts since 13 Jun, 2002 from Montreal
I don't use acrobat. I am using Foxit and I see now it has +/- buttons.If we're talkin bout the manual, and about Acrobat reader 5.0 its Ctrl and then either + or -
Is that what u mean? Sorry if its not
Cheers,
Gordon
-
- KVRist
- 398 posts since 25 Apr, 2002 from Chula Vista, CA
For some reason, it's hard for me to read books now, although I have a considerable number of them. I increase and decrease text size in Firefox as much as I need to with CTR + and CTR -; use Word that allows me to zoom; and Acrobat that allows me to zoom also using CTR +. I can't increase text size in everything (sorry if I mislead you), but I can increase the text size for the overwhelming majority of what I read. My wife, like you, would want the printed manual. Whatever works for you.Beardedone wrote:Interesting. Despite the fact that I prefer reading in bed or recling on a sofa reading on screen is jsu not comfortable. And I am curious as to how you zoom? Is this possible in windows XP?Beardedone wrote:
Quote:
I really don't like printed manuals, I prefer having everything on screen.
Don't you find reading text on screen fatiguing? I find it gives me headaches after 5 minutes. Young eyes I guess.
I think it's different eyes. My eyes will be 55 in 18 days and I have a real problem reading anything in print now. The screen is much more clear and I can zoom to whatever I need to. It's not fatiguing to me at all. I know your comment wasn't directed at me, but since I have eyes that qualify as old, I wanted to add my 2 cents.


