"OB-X" on Receptor
-
- KVRian
- 781 posts since 25 May, 2006
mhh - I may ask some of my customers who has receptor too
-
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 1116 posts since 22 Apr, 2005 from Nashville, TN USA
To get OP-X to show up correctly on Receptor edit the -info-cache.xml file in your OPX folder (change the word "container" to "OP-X").PhilMuller wrote:This is going to seem like a dumb question but, I have download the "Eighties single patches and banks".. but now how do I get them into the Receptor. I tried putting them in "Drop Installers Here", but when I go into Setup nothing shows up... Help Please?
Also, When I installed OP-X on the Receptor it installed as "Container" within SonicProjects. This is very annoying - it being called "Container" instead of OP-X.
To install these eight patches (this worked for me anyway)....I created a folder in "Drop Installers Here" called "Eighties". Into this folder I put the 8 FXP files. SETUP page showed me "8 files" to install. After installing them, I now have a bank called "Eighties" in my OB-X's bank list.
Hope this helps!
-
- KVRist
- 309 posts since 11 Sep, 2005 from Virginia
It worked, Hurray! I guess the trick was to place the .fxp and .fxb files into a folder within "Drop Installers Here". Thank you very much. I am going to play with e OP-X all night long.Hybernation wrote:To install these eight patches (this worked for me anyway)....I created a folder in "Drop Installers Here" called "Eighties". Into this folder I put the 8 FXP files. SETUP page showed me "8 files" to install. After installing them, I now have a bank called "Eighties" in my OB-X's bank list.
Hope this helps!
-
- KVRian
- 781 posts since 25 May, 2006
you are welcome 
by the way: is here a guy called Brandon Still around? I can't reach you by email - probably this shitty yahoo filters it out all the time...
by the way: is here a guy called Brandon Still around? I can't reach you by email - probably this shitty yahoo filters it out all the time...
-
- KVRian
- 781 posts since 25 May, 2006
found him fortunately
-
- KVRian
- 691 posts since 13 May, 2004 from Silicon Valley
Hi Everyone,
Just wanted to add an endorsement on Peter's behalf for version 1.4 of OP-X. 1.4 fixes the "high squeel" and "multi-instance" polyphony issues that were earlier reported. I find CPU usage average to higher (in the class of MiniMonsta), but still very workable on Receptor with other plugs going.
With these 1.4 fixes, I find OP-X much more stable and reliable. I will be using it as part of my gigging rig for those nice OB dynamic pads and leads (I find this much more compelling than any other OB sample sets I've tried).
For any of you sitting on the fence about OP-X on Receptor, things just got a lot better with 1.4.
Cheers,
Kevin L.
Just wanted to add an endorsement on Peter's behalf for version 1.4 of OP-X. 1.4 fixes the "high squeel" and "multi-instance" polyphony issues that were earlier reported. I find CPU usage average to higher (in the class of MiniMonsta), but still very workable on Receptor with other plugs going.
With these 1.4 fixes, I find OP-X much more stable and reliable. I will be using it as part of my gigging rig for those nice OB dynamic pads and leads (I find this much more compelling than any other OB sample sets I've tried).
For any of you sitting on the fence about OP-X on Receptor, things just got a lot better with 1.4.
Cheers,
Kevin L.
-
- KVRian
- 781 posts since 25 May, 2006
thanks kevin - yes, the bugs discussed at the beginning of this thread were fixed - no more high pitch artefacts and no more irregulasrities in multiple instance usage - the code has been rewritten where in was necessary - the updates (1.4) are currently sent to our customers (they're free of course)- I'd like to thank again for the detailed reporting of the behavoiour on receptor
-
- KVRist
- 309 posts since 11 Sep, 2005 from Virginia
Things just got even better again with the latest library provided by Peter! Thanks Peter. Wow!looneytunes wrote:.... For any of you sitting on the fence about OP-X on Receptor, things just got a lot better with 1.4.
-
- KVRian
- 691 posts since 13 May, 2004 from Silicon Valley
Indeed!
Thanks, Peter.
Kevin L.
Thanks, Peter.
Kevin L.
-
- KVRian
- 571 posts since 14 Oct, 2004 from UK
I bought it yesterday. Another happy user.
-
- KVRian
- 691 posts since 13 May, 2004 from Silicon Valley
Guess What? Things just got even better again!
OP-X Pro is out - it's an upgrade from OP-X with some very cool filtering options, and individual tuning controls on oscillators, filters, and portamento. Also fast-reacting Envolopes.
Works great on Receptor too!
Nice Job Peter!
Kevin L
OP-X Pro is out - it's an upgrade from OP-X with some very cool filtering options, and individual tuning controls on oscillators, filters, and portamento. Also fast-reacting Envolopes.
Works great on Receptor too!
Nice Job Peter!
Kevin L
-
- KVRist
- 309 posts since 11 Sep, 2005 from Virginia
I bought Pro, but I think my dll was corrupt because it won't install and Live won't even recognize it as a plugin. Has anybody had this probelm with OP-X Pro?looneytunes wrote:Guess What? Things just got even better again!
OP-X Pro is out - it's an upgrade from OP-X with some very cool filtering options, and individual tuning controls on oscillators, filters, and portamento. Also fast-reacting Envolopes.
Works great on Receptor too!
Nice Job Peter!
Kevin L
-
- KVRian
- 691 posts since 13 May, 2004 from Silicon Valley
Hi Phil,
I had no problem installing on a regular PC Host (forte), and on Receptor. I think you might be right about the image being corrupted. I'm sure Peter would be happy to set you up with another DL if you explain the situation.
In Pro, there are some amazing patches that emulate leads on an OB8, Matrix, as well as other synths (like a Quadra). Peter really has seemed to capture the instabilities of analog hardware on this rev.
BTW - If you haven't tried Stringer, you should check that out too! It's amazing to hear well sampled string machines without aliasing (other romplers (eg eve, Ultrafocus, ...) expose loud sub-harmonics artifacts).
Regards,
Kevin L
I had no problem installing on a regular PC Host (forte), and on Receptor. I think you might be right about the image being corrupted. I'm sure Peter would be happy to set you up with another DL if you explain the situation.
In Pro, there are some amazing patches that emulate leads on an OB8, Matrix, as well as other synths (like a Quadra). Peter really has seemed to capture the instabilities of analog hardware on this rev.
BTW - If you haven't tried Stringer, you should check that out too! It's amazing to hear well sampled string machines without aliasing (other romplers (eg eve, Ultrafocus, ...) expose loud sub-harmonics artifacts).
Regards,
Kevin L