Software has NEVER ACHIEVED Decent Guitar Distortion. Nope.

VST, AU, AAX, CLAP, etc. Plugin Virtual Effects Discussion
Post Reply New Topic
RELATED
PRODUCTS

Post

Hink wrote:
Empty Uranus wrote:
Hink wrote:no when I said listen to Brian May I meant listen to him...I mean I can hear his tone anytime I want...I want to listen t him. I imagine it would be quite riveting, he is quite intelligent. I'd be contenet just to ask a few questions and listen to what he has to say....;)
You know - so many people look at me with a strange look when I say "you'd never believe how much the sound has to do with the way you hold your pick"..... He's a prime example.

Shhhhhhhh - don't let that get out. :D

actually Brian May was the inspiration behind my making brass picks, which I use less than 50% of the time.

Image

I tried different coins including a penny (which I figured was the U.S. equivalent of what he uses)...however I dont think there is a universal "right" way to hold a pick. That's not saying that I do not agree with you, I'm just saying that varies a lot from one person to another, and from one style to another. For me picking is done with extreme finesse, but I also feel it's one of the most important parts of playing. How you attack the strings and where you attack them are quite important. But not always how you hold the pick, many players don't even use a pick. I worked very hard many, many years ago to learn to squeal without a pick...it's amazing how that strengthened my ability to do squeals with the pick.

In some ways the guitar is this extremely precise instrument and in other ways it's totally an illogical sloppy instrument. Picking laterally along the strings you find that it doesn't take much distance in either direction to make large tonal changes (and pitch changes with pinching out the squeals). How you hold the pick is should be based on what works best for you (ever see how EVH holds a pick?) Myself I grip the pick very close to the tip most of the time and expose more of the tip when needed. However, the pick is only a small part of it...of course there is palm muting which kind of obvious to begin with. But also what else you're doing with your picking hand can create interesting tones.

Like for example, it's easy to know where the natural harmonics lie across the neck and you have frets to mark where they are. But those natural harmonics can be achieved right on top of the body as well...they only thing is you have to have to memorize where...but you can't memorize by looking, it has to be by feel. I think as much dynamics (or more if you're good at it) comes from just that...how you attack the strings and where. Many guitarists I have played with pick at the same spot all the time...in fact you can see it on their strings and sometimes the bodies as well. Myself I am equally adept at picking anywhere between about the 17th fret back to up tight against the bridge and my right hand travels between yhe end of the neck and the bridge.

Picking on the neck is reserved for specific circumstances, but is a cool technique. For instance in some tunings bending the higher strings together two at a time and picking, fingering and bending fast on the neck (which means following the strings as you bend) creates some incredible tones. Also, countering the pick direction on a single string with finger vibrato (picking on the neck) creates some nice sounds as well as speed illusions...the former (bending two strings together while picking on the neck) is a technique I picked watching and listening to Gary Moore...done proper it's over the top but sounds great, done poorly it's nothing but string masturbation. Of course there are times when picking further down the neck is cool too.

Another cool technique is to train you middle and ring finger (the pinky I usually reserve for the volume knob) for the "way over done" tapping. You won't find many examples of me tapping in the tradition sense. Instead I like very slow taps combined with fairly deep bends (again it means following the string with your tapping finger), it creates an inside out kind of feel (the end of my song Plight of a dreamer as it fades has this).

so please forgive when I say
you'd never believe how much the sound has to do with the way you hold your pick
is very accurate but also very generalized and a tad bit of a simplistic explanation, there's just far more to picking than just the grip. Often I find that many teachers do not teach the value of the right hand enough...we wont even get into the principles and benefits of back picking, and what back picking can do to change the mood of a chord or a composition.

:)

FWIW I can whip out examples of these techniques at will if anyone is confused I'll gladly post up some examples.
Great post. I agree. Three English guitarists I can think of right off the bat that use just the very tip end of the pick are May, Iommi, and Gilmour. All 3 have killer tones. As you stated, it's WHERE you do that as well. Those three guys tend to pick up around the top pickup. They are also getting some of their sound in how the string hits the thumb after it hits the pick. If I'm double picking - obviously I leave more out. Other than that, I sort of do it like the ones mentioned.

That being said, when I go over to a Strat, I absolutely LOVE the trebley, gritty Blackmore sound. Nobody uses that sound enough. I get pretty tired of all the top pickup, SRV sounds, as it's just too common. I'll pick a Strat right down there ON the bridge - just to make it as bright and irritating as possible.

Other guitarists that pick high with just a TINY bit of pick - Billy Gibbons for one, and Barry Bailey of the Atlanta Rhythm Section.

I wouldn't know what teachers do or don't do, as I'm 100% self-taught (hell - I don't even tune to standard), but over the years, you start figgerin' out these little things. :D

Post

don't forget Roy Buchanon, amazing pick technique.

don't you guys find that sims limit the variablity of pick attack? i do, that's why i still prefer a good tube preamp into a cab impulse.
Image
. . .holograms within holograms. . .

Post

Synesthesiac wrote:don't you guys find that sims limit the variablity of pick attack? i do, that's why i still prefer a good tube preamp into a cab impulse.
Usually that is what I tweak the sim for most - the attack, and I can usually get it acting pretty good. The TbT plugs like SaturatedDriver and GreaseTube seem like they work pretty good in front of amp sims to tweak the attack.

To run your tube pre's into the computer do you use any special cables or noise reduction techniques? I tried running some of my tube gear into my computer a few years back and the noise was unbearable, and I pretty much gave up on it after a while.

Post

They are also getting some of their sound in how the string hits the thumb after it hits the pick
I do that exteremly often, but mostly on the lower strings...it gives that half squeal vibrato tone...it's nice just after the note is pervieved. I don't play slap bass but I imagine some of the technique is similar...I also will use a simliar technice during chugging (not always, it just works good there)...instead of a pick attack I'll drop my picking thumb down on the strings once in a while and get a slightly weaker sound that is close to the real tight pinching sound (without squealing, like the beginning of gimme shelter) across three strings at the same time.

BTW I am totally oppposed to changing my strings, I do so only when there is no choice...or I pop three different strings out of a set...it doesn't matter if I pop the same one several times though....but then breaking a string is quite rare for me... :)
The highest form of knowledge is empathy, for it requires us to suspend our egos and live in another's world. It requires profound, purpose‐larger‐than‐the‐self kind of understanding.

Post

Well the only piece of tube i've hooked up is an aging ADA MP1 preamp which has an optional line out that makes interfacing easy. i haven't noticed any extra noise.
Image
. . .holograms within holograms. . .

Post

Synesthesiac wrote:don't forget Roy Buchanon, amazing pick technique.

don't you guys find that sims limit the variablity of pick attack? i do, that's why i still prefer a good tube preamp into a cab impulse.
not at all...I can't say that I've actually lost anything from my tone using xt live...well maybe some noise. But perhaps on the attack thing it might have something to do with the fact that all my guitars are active. The signal is low impedance and the original attack before leaving my guitar has already gone through a pre-amp stage, but I don't think that's truely the reason.

Tbh I think some of the perceived loss from PODS and others is more in the players head. An in depth blind test (not samples but the player plugging his guitar into many choices blindly) would be very interesting. So much of hearing is based on perception that it's easy for the brain to talk us out of liking things by default, ear fatigue often creates this illusion as well...as does often in non blind tests we may be over critical of what where testing and more subjective comparing it to what we like now...:)
The highest form of knowledge is empathy, for it requires us to suspend our egos and live in another's world. It requires profound, purpose‐larger‐than‐the‐self kind of understanding.

Post

Synesthesiac wrote:Well the only piece of tube i've hooked up is an aging ADA MP1 preamp which has an optional line out that makes interfacing easy. i haven't noticed any extra noise.
it really depends on your settings and volume level.. :wink:
The highest form of knowledge is empathy, for it requires us to suspend our egos and live in another's world. It requires profound, purpose‐larger‐than‐the‐self kind of understanding.

Post

Synesthesiac wrote:Well the only piece of tube i've hooked up is an aging ADA MP1 preamp which has an optional line out that makes interfacing easy. i haven't noticed any extra noise.
Hmmm...maybe it's about time to try again. I don't think Boogex was even around yet when I last tried, so I wasn't impressed with my results enough to really try to figure out the noise.

Also, I've been a lot happier with the attack of amp sims since I got my new interface, an Edirol FA-66. It has a built in limiter so I can set it to be a lot more sensitive without digital clipping. I can watch the limit light to set the input as sensitive as possible.
Hink wrote:BTW I am totally oppposed to changing my strings, I do so only when there is no choice...or I pop three different strings out of a set...it doesn't matter if I pop the same one several times though....but then breaking a string is quite rare for me... :)
Since I stated using baritone strings I never break anything but the high E (er...that would actually be high D for me now) - only twice this year!

Post

i haven't tried the pods so...and i'll admit to being susceptible to confirmation bias if you will :D

a blind test such as you propose would be very interesting.

and if you haven't yet, try a tube preamp that can go from clean to chaos then add a good cab impulse.

noisevault has a good G12H...and it's not good because it's an impulse of the infamous G12 but because the impulse creator took care to capture the speaker well.
Image
. . .holograms within holograms. . .

Post

Synesthesiac wrote:i haven't tried the pods so...and i'll admit to being susceptible to confirmation bias if you will :D

a blind test such as you propose would be very interesting.

and if you haven't yet, try a tube preamp that can go from clean to chaos then add a good cab impulse.

noisevault has a good G12H...and it's not good because it's an impulse of the infamous G12 but because the impulse creator took care to capture the speaker well.
back about a hundred years ago (okay more like 20-25 years ago :hihi:) I had a plexi head (100 watt)....I traded that for a boogie head (SOB, 100/60 watt) in 86...it got stolen in either 89 or 90, both those sat on a Hi-watt 4x12 with fanes...now I have a Marshall tube pre through a power amp...it sits on a 4x12 angle cab with celestions...I tried the pre into the POD cabs, it was okay...I haven't tried it with an impulse though... ;)
The highest form of knowledge is empathy, for it requires us to suspend our egos and live in another's world. It requires profound, purpose‐larger‐than‐the‐self kind of understanding.

Post

guitarzan wrote:To run your tube pre's into the computer do you use any special cables or noise reduction techniques? I tried running some of my tube gear into my computer a few years back and the noise was unbearable, and I pretty much gave up on it after a while.
I have a Soldano SP-77 and a Mesa V-Twin, both producing almost no noise, even on higher gain settings. They're running straight into whatever line in.
Probably the best hybrid sound I've played so far.
There are 3 kinds of people:
Those who can do maths and those who can't.

Post

Sascha Franck wrote:
guitarzan wrote:To run your tube pre's into the computer do you use any special cables or noise reduction techniques? I tried running some of my tube gear into my computer a few years back and the noise was unbearable, and I pretty much gave up on it after a while.
I have a Soldano SP-77 and a Mesa V-Twin, both producing almost no noise, even on higher gain settings. They're running straight into whatever line in.
Probably the best hybrid sound I've played so far.
either that or you fried your ears 20 years ago :P j/k of course, but this did happen to my half brother...his son (who is now grown) started drumming young, by the time he was 10 he was playing with the high school band (by the time he was 13 he played guitar more)...dumbass even bought his kid timpani...so he and his son would play all the time in a small room...his kid was quite loud for a child...add to that the fact that my half brother also owned his own construction companies (yes plural because he's a moron)...never did he wear hearing protection until it was too late...he heard more hiss in his ears than came out of his amp, with a space chorus :shock: ...I'd point out the hiss and he couldn't hear it at all...he use to laugh at me when we worked together because I wore headphone type hearing protection...somehow I don't think he laughs anymore... :wink:
The highest form of knowledge is empathy, for it requires us to suspend our egos and live in another's world. It requires profound, purpose‐larger‐than‐the‐self kind of understanding.

Post

Sascha Franck wrote:
guitarzan wrote:To run your tube pre's into the computer do you use any special cables or noise reduction techniques? I tried running some of my tube gear into my computer a few years back and the noise was unbearable, and I pretty much gave up on it after a while.
I have a Soldano SP-77 and a Mesa V-Twin, both producing almost no noise, even on higher gain settings. They're running straight into whatever line in.
Probably the best hybrid sound I've played so far.
I think the ones I was getting so much noise from was the Hughes and Kettner Blues Master (aka: Crunch Master) series, I have all four. Those things have power tubes and output transformers, they're really a small half rack head and I guess that could be the cause of all the noise? Maybe if I just try my H&K Tubeman pedals or I have a nice SOHO QTR-1 tube pre (improved version of the Kitty Hawk Quattro) it'll be fine. I think I'll dig all that stuff out of storage this weekend.

Is there anything better than Boogex to use as a VST cabinet emulator? Man, a vst with some kind of active (dynamic) speaker emulation would be the ticket.

Post

boogex has very low latency, unlike sir. these are the only 2 free ones i know of. Pristine Space by the same guy who makes Boogex is much better, 8 channels (you could load up an on axis 57 impulse in one channel and a room condensor in another, for example), zero latency, fine tuning adjustments, more i cant remember.

oh gawd yes, dynamic convolution impulses would be front row center, with backstage pass and a groupie for each arm :D
Image
. . .holograms within holograms. . .

Post

Synesthesiac wrote:boogex has very low latency, unlike sir. these are the only 2 free ones i know of. Pristine Space by the same guy who makes Boogex is much better, 8 channels (you could load up an on axis 57 impulse in one channel and a room condensor in another, for example), zero latency, fine tuning adjustments, more i cant remember.

oh gawd yes, dynamic convolution impulses would be front row center, with backstage pass and a groupie for each arm :D
Ok, I know dynamic convolution has some kind of patent so other developers can't use that technology - but wouldn't there be some way for the individual users to patch something together? Like one plug that chooses an output channel based on input amplitude then route those outputs to different instances of Boogex each loaded with an IR, or a something like the 8 channel thing you described?

What I mean is - one plug does the dynamic part, and other plugs provide the impulses (you'd need the right series of impulses, too) - if you get each from a different place and use them together yourself couldn't you use dynamic convolution without anyone breaking any patent laws?

Post Reply

Return to “Effects”