Sort of dumb Voxengo question...
-
- KVRian
- 680 posts since 3 Jan, 2003 from Around the Greater Tokyo area of Japan
From my experience Fruity Vocoder is just about in that range band- and CPU-wise... and it sounds okay/acceptable to me... but I imagine yours could be even better sound-wise...Cybotron wrote:Me too!phrauge wrote:I'll gladly take a 30% CPU hit if your Vocoder works as well as your other plugs.Aleksey Vaneev wrote:I may be interested in creating a 32-band 'classic' stereo vocoder, but its CPU load will be pretty high - something like 30% on Athlon XP 3000+.
- KVRAF
- 6478 posts since 16 Dec, 2002
yep, 32 quality bandpass filters -> envelope followers to all bands -> multiplying yet another 32 bandpasses + additional sibilance sidechaining = CPU hog pig monster. oversample all that and it's goodbye to 2-3ghz of pure processing power.Aleksey Vaneev wrote:For example, I may be interested in creating a 32-band 'classic' stereo vocoder, but its CPU load will be pretty high - something like 30% on Athlon XP 3000+. I doubt many users will be happy with such performance. But 5-band vocoder with 5% load is not the same thing at all.
but I bet it'll sound a lot like those Sennheisers, too.
But hey, it was barely practical even back in the day as analog implementation as well. Not a whole lot of them was ever built due to it being so expensive to produce.
