KVR Audio

bduffy · Post by **bduffy** » Wed Aug 23, 2006 7:40 pm

No one's switching teams, that's for sure!

HanafiH · Post by **HanafiH** » Wed Aug 23, 2006 7:42 pm

cptgone wrote: i hope so... and i'll give it a good look before upgrading my SX2.

Don't let inadequately tested bloatware do to you what Cubase did to Tina Turner.

Steinberg? Just say no.

cptgone · Post by **cptgone** » Wed Aug 23, 2006 7:43 pm

@ headquest:

Freeze was:
- incredibly slow
- not very useful (there's not much you can do with a frozen track, bouncing tracks is preferable)

it still is, in SX2.

so, what i meant was: Steinberg has a tradition of adding flashy features in a makeshift way that renders 'em useless.

Kingston · Post by **Kingston** » Wed Aug 23, 2006 7:46 pm

I'm now mildly curious what they've possibly done to the graphical side in nuendo4. I mean C4 does now look refreshing after all those years of 'cheap hooker eye shadow blue'[tm] and 'fisher-price icon blocks for the whole family'[tm].

What I'm looking forward to most are the supposed audio engine improvements, routing, (hopefully) fixed multimonitor and workspace control & editor linking, and the euphonix improved automation.

Not about the change hosts here so best make the most of it, eh?

Kingston · Post by **Kingston** » Wed Aug 23, 2006 7:49 pm

cptgone wrote:so, what i meant was: Steinberg has a tradition of adding flashy features in a makeshift way that renders 'em useless.

yep, atrocious way of adding slap-on halfway thought through features, that cause all kinds of trouble around the places. It's even worse when it's something very global like editor linking & workspaces. The poor user has no choice but to *not* use those features to the full extent.

headquest · Post by **headquest** » Wed Aug 23, 2006 7:51 pm

cptgone wrote:@ headquest:

Freeze was:
- incredibly slow
- not very useful (there's not much you can do with a frozen track, bouncing tracks is preferable)

it still is, in SX2.

so, what i meant was: Steinberg has a tradition of adding flashy features in a makeshift way that renders 'em useless.

Ah - yes - I see what you mean indeed

Cheers.

TotcProductions · Post by **TotcProductions** » Wed Aug 23, 2006 8:52 pm

beej wrote:Cubase 4 Dummies?

Majken · Post by **Majken** » Wed Aug 23, 2006 9:34 pm

Looks very promising. I wonder what the Insert Routing can be used for and what type of plugin ModMachine is

/Majken

K-Slash · Post by **K-Slash** » Wed Aug 23, 2006 9:59 pm

On the official Cubase forum, an administrator says that no informations about the product will be released before the end of september.

The thing that is sure is that they will made a full presentation and demonstration at the 121st AES in San Francisco in the first half of october.

bduffy · Post by **bduffy** » Wed Aug 23, 2006 10:02 pm

Cool. Man, I'm getting sick of the photo of Patti Labelle...

sonicfire · Post by **sonicfire** » Wed Aug 23, 2006 10:12 pm

HanafiH wrote:
cptgone wrote: i hope so... and i'll give it a good look before upgrading my SX2.

Don't let inadequately tested bloatware do to you what Cubase did to Tina Turner.

Steinberg? Just say no.

bduffy · Post by **bduffy** » Wed Aug 23, 2006 10:18 pm

AGH!!!

Majken · Post by **Majken** » Wed Aug 23, 2006 10:20 pm

bduffy: I'm liking your signature image. Cubase SX3 and Chimera. Couldn't be better

/Majken

bduffy · Post by **bduffy** » Wed Aug 23, 2006 10:23 pm

Majken wrote:bduffy: I'm liking your signature image. Cubase SX3 and Chimera. Couldn't be better

/Majken

Blush. Had to go for the quality goods.

HanafiH · Post by **HanafiH** » Wed Aug 23, 2006 10:38 pm

bduffy wrote:Blush. Had to go for the quality goods.

Have you considered amputation?