Voxengo Overtone GEQ (free VST plug-in)

VST, AU, AAX, CLAP, etc. Plugin Virtual Effects Discussion
Post Reply New Topic
RELATED
PRODUCTS

Post

Aleksey Vaneev wrote: So, bmanic, you are a father now? :)
Yes. My wife gave birth to our daughter 7th of September. 8)

Cheers!
bManic
"Wisdom is wisdom, regardless of the idiot who said it." -an idiot

"They don't ban hate speech; they ban speech they hate." -an oracle
Top

Post

Quote:
Must I understand that this new 8 channels layout will be extended to other plugins ?

Yes, after testing I plan to re-use all this new functionality in next plug-in releases.
I think that I dream...:love:
Hem, and "only" eight channels I/O ?
Top

Post

I have one request, The A/B Buttons. Please could you turn the A/B buttons into one button, I often close my eyes as I switch between A/B's and so find one button easier to do this with, also it will save you space!
Top

Post

Johnny Cherry wrote:I have one request, The A/B Buttons. Please could you turn the A/B buttons into one button, I often close my eyes as I switch between A/B's and so find one button easier to do this with, also it will save you space!
+1! :tu:
Top

Post

Will the plugin remains with fixed frequencies, or will it be possile in the future to set custom freq (80hz instead of 64, for example) ?
Frequencies will remain fixed in Overtone GEQ. Because this is a graphic EQ. Non-fixed frequencies really require a parametric EQ in GlissEQ appearance (otherwise you won't be able to control equalizer sound with ease).
bmanic wrote:Yes. My wife gave birth to our daughter 7th of September. 8)
Congratulations. :)
Hem, and "only" eight channels I/O ?
It is easily expandable to ANY number... I will be waiting for requests. But 8 seems quite adequate. 12 seems to be a maximum (according to VST spec) - but even that is very rarely used as far as I understand.
Please could you turn the A/B buttons into one button
Yes, will do. I will simply do a switch to 'B' label from 'A' when that button is pressed.
Image
Top

Post

so... will glisseq go through these changes? :D
Top

Post

It is easily expandable to ANY number... I will be waiting for requests. But 8 seems quite adequate. 12 seems to be a maximum (according to VST spec) - but even that is very rarely used as far as I understand.
12 is very nice to my needs at least (mainly because i often eq beats, and i have to boost the kick freq while cutting the narrow freq to avoid muddy sound : so one band between 20-70, one between 80-120, and one around 120-200 would make Overtone a better tool for this work ;) )
But i guess 12 bvands would increase cpu needs ? So maybe 8 bands is fine if the goal is a "goto" eq... ?
Top

Post

Anyone using Wavelab can verify if this
Plug-In is working on your DAW.

The dll won't load in mine. :cry:
OMNIFEX

14.8 GB Of VST Effects And Growing By The Moment :D
Top

Post

sinkmusic wrote:
It is easily expandable to ANY number... I will be waiting for requests. But 8 seems quite adequate. 12 seems to be a maximum (according to VST spec) - but even that is very rarely used as far as I understand.
12 is very nice to my needs at least (mainly because i often eq beats, and i have to boost the kick freq while cutting the narrow freq to avoid muddy sound : so one band between 20-70, one between 80-120, and one around 120-200 would make Overtone a better tool for this work ;) )
But i guess 12 bvands would increase cpu needs ? So maybe 8 bands is fine if the goal is a "goto" eq... ?

there were talking about channels, not bands - entreily different topic... ;-)
Top

Post

sinkmusic wrote:
It is easily expandable to ANY number... I will be waiting for requests. But 8 seems quite adequate. 12 seems to be a maximum (according to VST spec) - but even that is very rarely used as far as I understand.
12 is very nice to my needs at least (mainly because i often eq beats, and i have to boost the kick freq while cutting the narrow freq to avoid muddy sound : so one band between 20-70, one between 80-120, and one around 120-200 would make Overtone a better tool for this work ;) )
But i guess 12 bvands would increase cpu needs ? So maybe 8 bands is fine if the goal is a "goto" eq... ?
I was talking about channels - not bands. I do not plan to extend Overtone GEQ with more EQ bands.
Image
Top

Post

OMNIFEX wrote:Anyone using Wavelab can verify if this
Plug-In is working on your DAW.

The dll won't load in mine. :cry:
Which WaveLab version?
Image
Top

Post

rpc9943 wrote:so... will glisseq go through these changes? :D
Eventually, yes.
Image
Top

Post

It makes sense to keep the bands locked on a GEQ like this. I'm happy with it, and I'd look for one of Aleksey's commercial EQs for more (like GlissEQ)
Image
Top

Post

Aleksey Vaneev wrote:
OMNIFEX wrote:Anyone using Wavelab can verify if this
Plug-In is working on your DAW.

The dll won't load in mine. :cry:
Which WaveLab version?
3.0

It's very old, but all your other free versions run no problem.

When I call for the the VST, the outer
frame of the Window opens but no EQ is
shown.

Hang On, I'll post a picture.
OMNIFEX

14.8 GB Of VST Effects And Growing By The Moment :D
Top

Post

jens wrote:
sinkmusic wrote:
It is easily expandable to ANY number... I will be waiting for requests. But 8 seems quite adequate. 12 seems to be a maximum (according to VST spec) - but even that is very rarely used as far as I understand.
12 is very nice to my needs at least (mainly because i often eq beats, and i have to boost the kick freq while cutting the narrow freq to avoid muddy sound : so one band between 20-70, one between 80-120, and one around 120-200 would make Overtone a better tool for this work ;) )
But i guess 12 bvands would increase cpu needs ? So maybe 8 bands is fine if the goal is a "goto" eq... ?

there were talking about channels, not bands - entreily different topic... ;-)
Pfeeewwww, i should go back to bed... sorry !
Top
Post Reply

Return to “Effects”