FL Studio 6 vs Cubase Sx 3 TEST!!!!
-
tony tony chopper tony tony chopper https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=3103
- KVRAF
- 3561 posts since 20 Jun, 2002
you noobs are the reason marketing is feeding you with crap that you buy without hesitation
- KVRian
- 1305 posts since 26 May, 2003 from im müscha...
-
- KVRAF
- 10597 posts since 13 Jun, 2004 from Alberto Balsam
You failed teh internetsTribal House Beatz wrote:Out of curiosity i ran a little test with FL STUDIO 6 and CUBASE SX 3!...I imported the same loop into both hosts at the same tempo. Cranked up the volume too 100% in Fl studio or 0DB...Did the same in Cubase...Volume at 0db.......no effects.....no eq....no limiter.....no normalization....NOTHIN!!!! Both master chennels in both hosts were at 0db
Rendered both files as a wav at 44.1khz 16 bit..
Heres what FL STUDIO 6 sounded like
http://mysite.verizon.net/bennybonez/CL ... ST%201.wav
Heres what Cubase SX 3 sounded like
http://mysite.verizon.net/bennybonez/CL ... ST%202.wav
Explain to me...Why is one louder and more full sounding...That being the cubase one if i kept both volumes at the same exact level and rendering at the same exact quality???????![]()
![]()
Is the FL studio sound engine a tad weak????

- KVRAF
- 19156 posts since 13 Feb, 2003 from Vancouver, Canada
-
- KVRAF
- 3528 posts since 18 Apr, 2002 from British Columbia, Canada
jeezuz!!! it was an honest question. there IS a volume difference. He is not saying one is BETTER, and now that it has been explained to him as being a 3db volume difference, is it not kosher to wonder why? or is that just when FL is involved.
sheesh! like a bunch of howler monkeys, you lot.
sheesh! like a bunch of howler monkeys, you lot.
- KVRAF
- 19156 posts since 13 Feb, 2003 from Vancouver, Canada
Yeah, we should probably be a little kinder to noob questions like that; he doesn't know that we've heard this stuff before.
That Skeletor picture is freakin' hliarious, though.
And I love the sig, Z3R0T0N1N.
That Skeletor picture is freakin' hliarious, though.
And I love the sig, Z3R0T0N1N.
-
tony tony chopper tony tony chopper https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=3103
- KVRAF
- 3561 posts since 20 Jun, 2002
really? what does this mean?He is not saying one is BETTER
Why is one louder and more full sounding...
Is the FL studio sound engine a tad weak????
-
Jason Brian Merrill Jason Brian Merrill https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=87372
- KVRAF
- 2694 posts since 11 Nov, 2005 from http://maps.google.com/maps?oi=map&q=Massena,+NY --(on the Canadian border)
do not question the mightly FL!!!!Z3R0T0N1N wrote:jeezuz!!! it was an honest question. there IS a volume difference. He is not saying one is BETTER, and now that it has been explained to him as being a 3db volume difference, is it not kosher to wonder why? or is that just when FL is involved.
sheesh! like a bunch of howler monkeys, you lot.
check my profile for contact info.
msn messenger is my email as well.
msn messenger is my email as well.
-
- KVRian
- 866 posts since 30 Jul, 2004
For the obvious reason that untrained ears tend to hear louder=better.Vonbrucken wrote:by the way while i am waiting for you to post it on looptalak did you never thought the problem the other way: Why cubase is 0.3db louder than the normal ?
-
Jason Brian Merrill Jason Brian Merrill https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=87372
- KVRAF
- 2694 posts since 11 Nov, 2005 from http://maps.google.com/maps?oi=map&q=Massena,+NY --(on the Canadian border)
hence, engineering/mastering for the past 35 years...kevink wrote:For the obvious reason that untrained ears tend to hear louder=better.Vonbrucken wrote:by the way while i am waiting for you to post it on looptalak did you never thought the problem the other way: Why cubase is 0.3db louder than the normal ?
check my profile for contact info.
msn messenger is my email as well.
msn messenger is my email as well.
- KVRAF
- 2744 posts since 5 Dec, 2003 from Harlan's World
Louder is much better. I am definitely buying Cubase 4 so I can get more oomph. Does anyone know of they put a limit on volume in Cubase Studio?
My Soundcloud Too many pieces of music finish far too long after the end. - Stravinsky
-
- KVRian
- 509 posts since 15 Jul, 2002 from NYC
It means he's asking if it's weak, nothing more. Your sensitivity really runs away with you sometimes.tony tony chopper wrote:really? what does this mean?He is not saying one is BETTER
Why is one louder and more full sounding...
Is the FL studio sound engine a tad weak????
-
- KVRAF
- 3378 posts since 27 Feb, 2004 from Paris (france)
does someone know where is the stop button ?Jason Brian Merrill wrote:hence, engineering/mastering for the past 35 years...kevink wrote:For the obvious reason that untrained ears tend to hear louder=better.Vonbrucken wrote:by the way while i am waiting for you to post it on looptalak did you never thought the problem the other way: Why cubase is 0.3db louder than the normal ?
- KVRAF
- 19156 posts since 13 Feb, 2003 from Vancouver, Canada
No limit; it's got 128-bit processing.kovacs wrote:Louder is much better. I am definitely buying Cubase 4 so I can get more oomph. Does anyone know of they put a limit on volume in Cubase Studio?


