KVR Audio

grymmjack · Post by **grymmjack** » Wed Oct 25, 2006 3:12 am

eqkiller works exactly how you want.

grymmjack · Post by **grymmjack** » Wed Oct 25, 2006 3:13 am

http://scuzzphut.panicnow.net/Articles/ ... rv1.1.html

Lagrange · Post by **Lagrange** » Wed Oct 25, 2006 6:27 am

Not exactly but sounds pretty cool.. It's probably more of what I'm looking for though. Ever use a DJ mixer and you have those kill nobs/switches/buttons.. Thats what I'm lookin for in VST form..

L

Hannes_F · Post by **Hannes_F** » Wed Oct 25, 2006 6:42 am

FreqEqBoy from www.elevayta.com can do it.

Lagrange · Post by **Lagrange** » Wed Oct 25, 2006 1:41 pm

The thing is I can stack out the freqs now.. Just looking for an all in one solution..

Lagrange · Post by **Lagrange** » Wed Oct 25, 2006 1:42 pm

The thing is I can stack out the freqs now.. Just looking for an all in one solution..

EDIT: sorry guys I posted from page 1

thanx

grymmjack Hannes_F

Checking those now..

BertKoor · Post by **BertKoor** » Wed Oct 25, 2006 2:05 pm

Lagrange wrote:Not exactly but sounds pretty cool.. It's probably more of what I'm looking for though. Ever use a DJ mixer and you have those kill nobs/switches/buttons.. Thats what I'm lookin for in VST form..

L

The buttons labelled "mute"? Or you need one of those steep low-pass filters?

martian · Post by **martian** » Wed Oct 25, 2006 2:05 pm

Kingston wrote:in other news,

if you want an EQ that totally kills your sound, use any digital EQ pre-2000.

so whats changed since waves ren? AMLT, 64bit double, and?

Blue Cat Audio · Post by **Blue Cat Audio** » Wed Oct 25, 2006 2:33 pm

Ever tried our Parametr'EQ with several bands at the same center frequency? the response can be incredibly steep:

With the widening version you can choose where you want this notch to occur in the stereo field. You can actually have a single note totally disappear wherever you wish.

Letting a single frequency out is possible as well:

The minimum bandwidth is a hundredth of an octave (at halfway boost or cut)

http://www.bluecataudio.com/Products/Product_ParametrEQ

Kingston · Post by **Kingston** » Wed Oct 25, 2006 7:57 pm

martian wrote:
Kingston wrote:in other news,

if you want an EQ that totally kills your sound, use any digital EQ pre-2000.
so whats changed since waves ren? AMLT, 64bit double, and?

maybe the fact not everybody sticks a bleeding biquad derivation everywhere anymore and calls it a parametric EQ.

indeed 64bit double has had a great impact, but then there are also small, yet significant innovations on parametrisation and phase vs. frequency bell shaping, transistor/tube models, oversampling etc.

...like hydratone, nyquist EQ, voxengo GEC, harmoniEQ etc, you get the idea. I'm sure you can appreciate how much better we have it today compared to pre-2000.

waves renaissance EQ... *giggle*

Lagrange · Post by **Lagrange** » Thu Oct 26, 2006 12:09 am

biquad derivation? whoa felt a plane fly over my head on that one..

Amberience · Post by **Amberience** » Thu Oct 26, 2006 12:13 am

GBand by GVST can do what you want I reckon.

grymmjack · Post by **grymmjack** » Thu Oct 26, 2006 12:15 am

Amberience wrote:GBand by GVST can do what you want I reckon.

yar that's another good'un.

Kingston · Post by **Kingston** » Thu Oct 26, 2006 12:28 am

Lagrange wrote:biquad derivation? whoa felt a plane fly over my head on that one..

just a filter type derived from one of the most basic and boring sounding algorithms. it's beyond bread and butter.

Lagrange · Post by **Lagrange** » Thu Oct 26, 2006 1:11 pm

Blue Cat Audio wrote:Ever tried our Parametr'EQ with several bands at the same center frequency? the response can be incredibly steep:

With the widening version you can choose where you want this notch to occur in the stereo field. You can actually have a single note totally disappear wherever you wish.

Letting a single frequency out is possible as well:

The minimum bandwidth is a hundredth of an octave (at halfway boost or cut)

http://www.bluecataudio.com/Products/Product_ParametrEQ

Blue Cat your plugins are amazing!! Love em! WOW and skinnable! Thats no joke!!

What I dont get is why no devs simply dont put an option to enter a value higher than 24 or 32 dbs (or what ever the default is)? Why not just give the user to option to enter what ever value they desire?? That would probably minimize the need for soo much stacking aka cpu bog..

L

Eq that totally kills frequency..