FOOEY to the algo-buzz-playboy summer issue... that doesn't do enough to help make a hit record, if it does anything at all... besides giving them a woody.The Chase wrote:Youre right. It has algorythms and super summing too. Plus other meaningless buzzwords!toine6 wrote:PRO-TOOLS has extra ability because of the DSP so that you can mix with effects and tons of tracks without slow-ups or glitches. It can be argued that PRO-TOOLS also has a more efficient workflow for mixing audio, but that's debateable. The real key is the DSP. Give a regular DAW the power of 4 top notch PC's and Pro-tools probably wouldn't have an edge.
Any NON-ProTools hit records?
-
- KVRian
- 1313 posts since 29 Mar, 2002 from Salt Lake City, Utah - U.S.A.
-
- KVRist
- 371 posts since 26 May, 2005
I wonder what Ray Charles thought of Sonar's GUI?koolkeys wrote:That being said, Ray Charles used Sonar. I know cause I saw the ad on the back of CM magazine a while back!lol
Brent
-
- KVRAF
- 9600 posts since 17 Sep, 2002 from Gothenburg Sweden
Have you seen his wife ?deaneager wrote:I wonder what Ray Charles thought of Sonar's GUI?koolkeys wrote:That being said, Ray Charles used Sonar. I know cause I saw the ad on the back of CM magazine a while back!lol
Brent
-
- KVRAF
- 4822 posts since 14 Mar, 2002 from Somewhere else, on principle
He was probably more concerned with where his next "fix" was coming from.deaneager wrote:I wonder what Ray Charles thought of Sonar's GUI?
Last edited by John Vulich on Thu Oct 26, 2006 8:44 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- KVRAF
- 4822 posts since 14 Mar, 2002 from Somewhere else, on principle
Which one?jupiter8 wrote:Have you seen his wife ?
-
- KVRAF
- 9600 posts since 17 Sep, 2002 from Gothenburg Sweden
It was going to be a joke but now you've ruined it.John Vulich wrote:Which one?jupiter8 wrote:Have you seen his wife ?
Ah well, can't succeed everytime.
-
- KVRAF
- 4822 posts since 14 Mar, 2002 from Somewhere else, on principle
Oh sorry... let me try again...
No, I haven't seen his wife.
No, I haven't seen his wife.
-
- KVRAF
- 9600 posts since 17 Sep, 2002 from Gothenburg Sweden
Neither has he.
Hahahahahahahahhaaaaaaaahhhh. Teh funnay.
Hahahahahahahahhaaaaaaaahhhh. Teh funnay.
-
- KVRAF
- 4822 posts since 14 Mar, 2002 from Somewhere else, on principle
jupiter8 wrote:Neither has he.
Hahahahahahahahhaaaaaaaahhhh. Teh funnay.
-
- KVRAF
- 4822 posts since 14 Mar, 2002 from Somewhere else, on principle
I don't mean to be an alarmist... but I think that you just committed a hate crime! 
-
- KVRAF
- 9600 posts since 17 Sep, 2002 from Gothenburg Sweden
Coolness. First one today and i have'nt even finished my morning coffee yet.John Vulich wrote:I don't mean to be an alarmist... but I think that you just committed a hate crime!
I'll call Stevie Wonder as a defence witness as he made the same kind of joke during the Usa for Africa recordings.
And remember Ladies and Gentlemen,if you screw this one up either me or Ray Charles will drive you home later.
-
- KVRAF
- 4822 posts since 14 Mar, 2002 from Somewhere else, on principle
Don't make me slap you. 
-
- KVRer
- 17 posts since 6 Aug, 2004
Nothing to say on the subject, I just love this recording and there was no Protools involved 
mirror 1 http://www.megaupload.com/es/?d=OG1O1YOE
mirror 2 http://d.turboupload.com/d/1131345/noprotools.wav.html
(2mb wav file)
mirror 1 http://www.megaupload.com/es/?d=OG1O1YOE
mirror 2 http://d.turboupload.com/d/1131345/noprotools.wav.html
(2mb wav file)
-
- KVRian
- 1313 posts since 29 Mar, 2002 from Salt Lake City, Utah - U.S.A.
My job involves working with blind people and many of them are able to use computers with help from a screen reader. Apparently Sonar is about the only program that is blind friendly, in that it works with a screen reader and stuff. That being the case, I still don't think Ray Charles or Stevie Wonder has ever used Sonar themselves, but at least it's possible (can you imagine though, can't be an easy thing?).
I do know one blind muscian that records his own tracks, he primarily uses a mini-Moog, and 1/2" tape toe make his recordings. It's a shame that he is unable to be allowed into the world of vst's, though we have looked into Sonar being a possibility, although I have been unable to recommend it, because it just seems to difficult to me, and the fact that vst's do not work with screen readers etc. so it would just be used for audio without vst effects or vsti's.
But anyway, so as ridiculous as it may seem to have Stevie Wonder or Ray Charles representing a sequencer, it does make sense on some level, as Sonar is blind person friendly.
On a side note, I did meet one lady who interviewed Stevie Wonder for a college radio show about 15 years ago. She was blind and Stevie said it was one of the best interviews he'd ever done, because she never questioned him about his blindness, she just focused on questions about his music.
I do know one blind muscian that records his own tracks, he primarily uses a mini-Moog, and 1/2" tape toe make his recordings. It's a shame that he is unable to be allowed into the world of vst's, though we have looked into Sonar being a possibility, although I have been unable to recommend it, because it just seems to difficult to me, and the fact that vst's do not work with screen readers etc. so it would just be used for audio without vst effects or vsti's.
But anyway, so as ridiculous as it may seem to have Stevie Wonder or Ray Charles representing a sequencer, it does make sense on some level, as Sonar is blind person friendly.
On a side note, I did meet one lady who interviewed Stevie Wonder for a college radio show about 15 years ago. She was blind and Stevie said it was one of the best interviews he'd ever done, because she never questioned him about his blindness, she just focused on questions about his music.
-
- KVRAF
- 1869 posts since 15 Sep, 2003 from Land of Crazies, USA
+1John Vulich wrote:Any band that covers themselves in pig blood on stage?Lee702 wrote:and what music isnt
Dark Funeral. F'n awesome.