Sitting the vocals in the mix.

How to do this, that and the other. Share, learn, teach. How did X do that? How can I sound like Y?
RELATED
PRODUCTS

Post

No name wrote:Damn, I had hoped there was some way I could roll off below 100hz, and beef the bassline up elsewhere along the spectrum. I tried it out actually, and am realizing that it just isn't possible. Once I hipass aroun 50hz it immediately becomes lifeless and thin. If there is one part of mixing I hate, it is the bass and drums.
Another thing you can try is to put a compressor on the bass that has a side-chain input from the kick drum. This way, whenever the bass and kick happen at the same time, the level of the bass will be pulled down a bit (adjustable by the compressor settings) so that things to get too boomy when they hit at the same time. This way you can keep your low end in the bass and have it kind of pump with the kick drum... whenever the kick isn't hitting, the bass will still be big and full.

The other way to do the same sort of thing is to buss the bass and the kick drum to the same group channel or output buss and put a compressor across that to control the overall low end level. Set it so it really only pulls the level down when they both hit at the same time, and when they are playing separately there is no, or very little, gain reduction happening.

If you want to get even trickier, you can use a multiband compressor for either of the above and use just the low band set at the right frequency range to control only those low frequencies, but still let the harmonics of the bass and "click" of the kick attach through unaffected.

Hip-Hop is fairly sparse music to begin with, as opposed to the wall of guitars sound in a lot of rock/metal music, so you generally don't have to, nor do you want to, thin out the low end of the bass unless it's just way to boomy overall (which sometimes is the case). It's just a matter of getting the kick and bass to work together without blowing up the low end.

Remember that when you are removing some low end from a bass or kick that's too boomy, you don't have to use a high-pass filter that filters out all of the low end below a certain point (depending on the slope of the filter, of course). You can try a low-shelf filter and just subtract only the amount that is needed to clean it up a bit without completely removing all the low end. Sometimes even a parametric just centered around the problem frequencies can be used to remove some of the excess boom and clean it up a bit.

If you are using an 808 style kick, it's basically a sine wave with a bit of attack on the front. That sine wave is only going to have one fundamental frequency (unless it's a sample that has some distortion or something that adds some harmonics). You can figure out what the frequency is and then notch some of that frequency out of the bass without killing the rest of the low end of the bass, and that might help the two work better together.

Steve
DBAR Productions & MusicTECH - Greater Seattle area
http://www.dbar-productions.com
Find more of my "ramblings" at:
http://www.music-and-technology.com

Post

Good advice once again!

I actually did the compresser on a group and routed the bass and kick to it for compression, and it sounded a bit better, but then again I did compress the hell out of it. I'm going to give it another go tonight.

I'll try and use a parametric so I can single out the fundamental on the bass, it pretty much is an 808, but it has a little clicky attack on the beginning. I've been using the FL parametric eq anyways to look at the spectrum as it shows the spectrum in the EQ so you have a reference as to where to cut/boost in the spectrum (I love it). There might be some overtones in there though as it doesn't sound like pure sines.



I really think i'm going to sidechain the kick and bass, this seems like a good workaround here because I never lose any of that low end, yet I can clean it up.
"You are going to let the fear of poverty govern your life and your reward will be that you will eat, but you will not live."

Post

Another approach is to saturate the bass and remove the subs. It's possible to get a REALLY heavy bass without having to boost the subs. I usually let my kick fill the subs, and pitch the bass about an octave above the kick. A bit of saturation in the low mids (doesn't need to be much!) can produce a full-sounding kick/bass combo without getting mud all over the subs.

Of course, this works for my style of music, it might not work for everyone.

Either way, you've got to be REALLY careful with basses that dip down into sub frequencies. Due to the natural frequency response of our hearing, it's difficult to hear exactly what's going on down there. That means:

1) It's difficult to make judgements about what's down there. On the flip side, it's really easy to get things wrong. However difficult you think the subs are, they're more difficult than you think.

2) We'll have a natural tendency to turn up the subs so we can hear them better. Then we wonder why we've got more mud and less headroom. "My subs are kicking, but now my mix is wrecked!"

It's not a war on subs, it's a war on personal freedom. Keep that in mind at all times. :lol:

-Kim.

Post

Putting my money where my mouth is. In this song you can hear many of the techniques I've discussed in this thread.

Music Cafe thread here.

-Kim.

Post

Very nice and complex, how long did it take you to create this? Very nice indeed. I do see that the two most obvious things are the snare and vocal, and I can hear in this vocal that, I think, you've cut off a lot of low end, and it just sounds like you've boosted somewhere. Just can't pin down where, but it sounds clear and crisp. If that makes any sense.
"You are going to let the fear of poverty govern your life and your reward will be that you will eat, but you will not live."

Post

Also, I keep searching around for it but I see no conclusive tip on how to sidechain properly in FL. I used to know how to do it, using the peak controller, but i've never had any use for it up until now. Hence, the reason I don't know!:P Also, when I sidechain, what would be best to sidechain to? Should I just have it lower the volume a few db's or should I attach the peak controller to a compressor? I'm not sure which would be better or if it would even make a difference. I hope the sound is subtle though as "pumping" is not really used much in the type of song i'm working on now. If I recall correctly though you can do subtle volume changes without it pumping, yet the bass/kick would still sound nice and thick.
"You are going to let the fear of poverty govern your life and your reward will be that you will eat, but you will not live."

Post

No name wrote:Very nice and complex, how long did it take you to create this? Very nice indeed. I do see that the two most obvious things are the snare and vocal, and I can hear in this vocal that, I think, you've cut off a lot of low end, and it just sounds like you've boosted somewhere. Just can't pin down where, but it sounds clear and crisp. If that makes any sense.
It took me a week. :oops: Vocals were recorded first, last Monday. I probably spent about 10-12 hours on the song in total (including recording). Four hours on Monday recording and setting the overall direction, four hours on Friday completing the arrangement and adding the background instruments, and maybe two to four hours this weekend mixing and mastering.

The great thing about making sure the vocal and the snare are in the foreground is that the song carries no matter where it's played. On a crappy home hifi, in the car, on the radio, the SONG will always come through.

All the detailed sound bending in the background is a reward for those who listen carefully. :lol: :cool:

For vocal EQ, as I've described earlier in this thread, I usually dip a generous amount in the lower mids. Depending on the vibe of the song, I often also apply a bit of boost in the top to give the sound some air and to help it stay defined in a busy mix. I probably wouldn't boost the top of a vocal if I were mixing a sparse voice and acoustic guitar song.

-Kim.

Post

Well, it sounds excellent. I like the little touch ups though too. The vocal in the beginning that sounds like it's been through a bit of mangling. Sort of like a granulizer (I say this because i'm familiar with the FL granulizer, but it sounds excellent) and then the processed vocal was reversed. I don't know if you like to keep this type of stuff to yourself, but could you share with us all how you went about creating various elements in this track? From processing the vocals and creating the fx? I ask a lot!!! :lol: Which of course you might be busy anyways so it's no big deal if you can't or don't wanna, but it would be enlightening to see what you've done with it.

Ohhh, got an idea. A thread should be creating where people will put together their music, and then they will explain the process that led up to the creation of the song, it would be an excellent reference for others, as well as a chance to grab some inspiration. Maybe i'll post one in the music cafe or something, but i'm not sure if anyone will go with it or not, but we'll see.
"You are going to let the fear of poverty govern your life and your reward will be that you will eat, but you will not live."

Post

Kim (esoundz) wrote:Putting my money where my mouth is. In this song you can hear many of the techniques I've discussed in this thread.

-Kim.
Hey Kim,

Just wanted to say great work with that song! Very nicely done.

I'm up in Canada for the three-day weekend listening on the in-laws' computer with some crappy little powered computer speakers with no sub, and it even sounds great on these.

I'm really impressed if you put that whole song together from recording, to mixing and mastering, in only 10 to 12 hours!

Since I'm not at home, I can't get to my studio to post any specific examples of stuff we talked about in this thread. But, I'm game for posting a link to some recent work I did for a client:
Four songs at:
http://www.dbar-productions.com/frankie

That project was a fairly quick and VERY low budget project for a Navy singer/songwriter that we had to finish up in a hurry at the end of last year because he got called away to Iraq earlier than expected.

It was the first project for which I tracked live drums in my studio since I remodeled it to make room from drums, and got the necessary extra microphones and stands. So, it was kind of a test project to see if lives drums would sound any good in my relatively small tracking room.

It was mixed in a hurry, and those MP3 files are the first pass of each mix. We didn't have time to go back and do any tweaks. If I had time, I would have gone back and brought the drums and voice up a bit more, and backed off the guitars a bit.

You can probably hear some of the EQ techniques discussed in this thread used on the vocals, especially in the heavier songs where they had to compete more with guitars.

They were all pro studio musicians that I use regularly, except for the singer, Frankie, who also wrote the songs. The only non-live parts were the simple organ pads in the background of one song, which I played (I'm not a great player).

If you like his stuff, be sure to search for him on MySpace or iSound and support the small indy artists!

Steve
DBAR Productions & MusicTECH - Greater Seattle area
http://www.dbar-productions.com
Find more of my "ramblings" at:
http://www.music-and-technology.com

Post

music-tech wrote:
Since I'm not at home, I can't get to my studio to post any specific examples of stuff we talked about in this thread. But, I'm game for posting a link to some recent work I did for a client:
Four songs at:
http://www.dbar-productions.com/frankie


Steve
Hi Steve. That's some pro-sounding stuff alright. I'm no where near to that.

If I had any comment it would be that to my taste it's a bit clean and the instruments don't seem to blend to create one sound. But that's just my humble opinion.

Here's a song I did recently. Just tell me what you think.

http://www.martin-e-music.nl/mp3/thelongestroad.mp3

Martin

Post

Enjoyed your work Kim.

Nice to witness your skillful mixing and production.

Wishing you success.

Post

very cool song Kim. and cool voice on the girl, like a mix of goldfrapp, bjork and that woman who sang gollum's song.

Post

Martin E wrote: Hi Steve. That's some pro-sounding stuff alright. I'm no where near to that.

If I had any comment it would be that to my taste it's a bit clean and the instruments don't seem to blend to create one sound. But that's just my humble opinion.

Here's a song I did recently. Just tell me what you think.

http://www.martin-e-music.nl/mp3/thelongestroad.mp3

Martin
Thanks for the comments Martin.

I took a listen to your song, but I'm still up in Vancouver using the in-laws computer with speakers that have no low end at all and that I'm not familiar with, so for me to give too many specific critical comments on your mix would not be too helpful since I wouldn't know if it was a problem with your mix or these speakers.

The important thing is ALWAYS the song! A great song mixed poorly will still be selected over a bad song mixed greatly anyday. I liked your song, and the vocals and guitar work were all really nice. Nice melody and nice overall arrangement. Quite catchy.

The only possible comment I would make is that overall it could use some cutting around the 500 Hz range to clean it up and clear it up a bit. This could have been done during mixing, but, from what I can tell, you mix is fairly well balanced, and you could probably just do some cut around 500 Hz in the mastering to clear up the whole mix again. I probably would have also brought the vocals up front more to make it a bit more modern sounding, but they do sit nicely in the mix the way you have them, and it's a bit more of a older style sound that way.

I have no idea what's going on in the low end with these speakers, since they basically have no low end, so I can't comment on that.

But, it's a good song that people will enjoy, so as long as the mix doesn't get in the way of the enjoyment of the song, which it doesn't in this case, then you are fine!

You're on the right path with good songs and good musicianship, which is more important than anything else.

Steve
DBAR Productions & MusicTECH - Greater Seattle area
http://www.dbar-productions.com
Find more of my "ramblings" at:
http://www.music-and-technology.com

Post

No name wrote:Well, it sounds excellent. I like the little touch ups though too. The vocal in the beginning that sounds like it's been through a bit of mangling. Sort of like a granulizer (I say this because i'm familiar with the FL granulizer, but it sounds excellent) and then the processed vocal was reversed. I don't know if you like to keep this type of stuff to yourself, but could you share with us all how you went about creating various elements in this track? From processing the vocals and creating the fx? I ask a lot!!! :lol: Which of course you might be busy anyways so it's no big deal if you can't or don't wanna, but it would be enlightening to see what you've done with it.
I'm happy to share my techniques. You're right about the mangled vocal - I took the lasst phrase of the first verse, send it through KT Granulator (love that plugin!) with lots of feedback, and then reversed it.

Were there any other sounds in particular you wanted me to explain? I only ask because it'd take me all day to explain everything! Even relatively "simple" things can get pretty involved.

For example, there's a background pad in the introduction that sounds pretty basic, but it's back there to hint at a slightly more complex harmony than explicitly stated by the bassline on the tonic. The three chords in the pad move gradually from an "open" stacked fourth (B-E-A), via the flat 6th in first inversion (one of my favourites - B-D-G), before finally arriving at the root tonic (B-D-F#) - the effect is of gradually resolving to the tonic. At which point the violin also arrives at the tonic, and the vocal slice starts to emerge out of the texture. At first the vocal slice sounds like percussion due the the strong sillibance (and the similarity to the established hihats), but just as we start to recognise the sound as a voice, we hear the first word of the song - "love". The synth pad also makes a couple of reappearances to subtly add some harmonic diversity, but it's too subtle to pick out on it's own.

Or the synth bass in the introduction. It's one MIDI sequence simultaneously sent to two synth parts. The MIDI data has all random velocities (implemented by a Logical Editor preset I made myself in Cubase). One synth (panned left in the final version) has a resonant low pass filter cutoff controlled by velocity, and then massively distorted. This results in a harmonically rich sound that constantly changes spectral balance with every note (sequenced 16ths mostly) without the inconsistent volume changes that commonly result from "regular" filter cutoff. Maybe next time I'll try a phasor. the other synth line was just a straight electric bass, but processed with DFX Buffer Override, with the LFOs set to random drift, and the buffer size tuned so that the effect is similar to oscillator sync... if the oscillator was an electric bass, and the sync signal was drifting all over the place. :hihi:

And that's not even half of what's going on in the introduction! :lol:

No name wrote:Ohhh, got an idea. A thread should be creating where people will put together their music, and then they will explain the process that led up to the creation of the song, it would be an excellent reference for others, as well as a chance to grab some inspiration. Maybe i'll post one in the music cafe or something, but i'm not sure if anyone will go with it or not, but we'll see.
I've actually thought that a cool idea would be to have someone work on a song, but upload the latest version at the end of each day (or each hour, for me :lol:) so everyone could hear the progress and the process as the song develops.

-Kim.

Post

Carp! Why haven't I noticed that this thread is still going? Must've forgotten to click my last email notice. Great mixes, Kim and Music-tech. I'll have to read up when I get back from the movies. :D

Post Reply

Return to “Production Techniques”