AT2 better be light years ahead of Amplicrude 1 because AT 1's sound is akin to two cats fighting in a back alley. At an Upgrade price of $249.00 AT2 better be several light years ahead of AT1.TTonicMajor wrote: 2) AT2 simply has the best models available for purchase today. IK has dropped the dongle and put their efforts into creating something special that you simply have to try out while sitting next to a tube amp to appreciate. Go ahead you Tube bigots! Give it a try
TTonicMajor
pod xt? amplitube? guitar rig? i need advice quickly :)
- KVRAF
- 19852 posts since 16 Sep, 2001 from Las Vegas,USA
- KVRAF
- 19156 posts since 13 Feb, 2003 from Vancouver, Canada
So would you say it better be light years ahead of AT1? 
Teksonik, I can guarantee you that AT2 is nothing like AT1, which I hated too. I'm not saying spend $200, but it is light years beyond.
Teksonik, I can guarantee you that AT2 is nothing like AT1, which I hated too. I'm not saying spend $200, but it is light years beyond.
- KVRAF
- 3846 posts since 15 Mar, 2002 from Underworld
Totally agree, I mean take a listen to Rammstein for instance, fizzy to the bone, but it suits the mood well. Also, putting drums and synths through it and putting guitars through it is as different as night and day
. Even different guitars can sound soo different. I think finding the "right" [subjective] amp is almost voodoo-like and it's really hard to give the righ advice to anyone.
Like they say, your mileage may vary...
But generally speaking it's really helpful when someone tells you how some amp sounds, just in general, so you can narrow down the choice at least a bit... from, say, 4 to 3
[or 13 to 12
]
Cheers!
Like they say, your mileage may vary...
But generally speaking it's really helpful when someone tells you how some amp sounds, just in general, so you can narrow down the choice at least a bit... from, say, 4 to 3
Cheers!
It is no measure of health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society. - Jiddu Krishnamurti
- KVRAF
- 19156 posts since 13 Feb, 2003 from Vancouver, Canada
Yeah, this thread is a real testament to how radically different our tastes are with amps!! I really don't think there's any way somone could choose an amp sim based on our opinions. Like I said before, my guitar has such a specific sound, it only really seems to work with POD. Everything else is hit + miss (more miss).
You know, we should do a poll...did anyone ever do an amp sim poll?
You know, we should do a poll...did anyone ever do an amp sim poll?
- KVRAF
- 3846 posts since 15 Mar, 2002 from Underworld
I don't believe so. It'd be cool to see what amps people like the most. Excellent idea
.
It is no measure of health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society. - Jiddu Krishnamurti
- KVRAF
- 19156 posts since 13 Feb, 2003 from Vancouver, Canada
Make it so, Number 1. 
Actually, I'm not doing it until we get a 100% comprehensive list. Those polls can be nightmares when you forget something.
Actually, I'm not doing it until we get a 100% comprehensive list. Those polls can be nightmares when you forget something.
-
- KVRian
- 634 posts since 4 Apr, 2003 from Reykjavik, Iceland
You make a very important point, not all guitars are made equal. The guitar people are using makes up a huge part of the sound in my opinion so different amp sims do different things for people.bduffy wrote:Yeah, this thread is a real testament to how radically different our tastes are with amps!! I really don't think there's any way somone could choose an amp sim based on our opinions. Like I said before, my guitar has such a specific sound, it only really seems to work with POD. Everything else is hit + miss (more miss).
You know, we should do a poll...did anyone ever do an amp sim poll?
- KVRAF
- 19156 posts since 13 Feb, 2003 from Vancouver, Canada
-
- KVRAF
- 3002 posts since 24 Nov, 2003 from Heidelberg&Hamburg
Indeed an excellent idea! One could start with this old thread, the old 2005 ampsim-list HERE, but the guy who did it (I simply do not know enough of what's around on the market) had to, err, cut the list a bit additionally to add the new ones since that time, or we had to decide after reading through some pages...
-
- KVRAF
- 4878 posts since 13 Jun, 2002 from Montreal
I did not like AT1 much but I love AT2. They are completely different plugins IMO.
- KVRAF
- 19156 posts since 13 Feb, 2003 from Vancouver, Canada
Holy shit!Klemperer wrote:Indeed an excellent idea! One could start with this old thread, the old 2005 ampsim-list HERE, but the guy who did it (I simply do not know enough of what's around on the market) had to, err, cut the list a bit additionally to add the new ones since that time, or we had to decide after reading through some pages...
Can you fit that in a poll?
- KVRAF
- 19852 posts since 16 Sep, 2001 from Las Vegas,USA
Entire Galaxies ahead!bduffy wrote:So would you say it better be light years ahead of AT1?
Teksonik, I can guarantee you that AT2 is nothing like AT1, which I hated too. I'm not saying spend $200, but it is light years beyond.
But when we think about it how many different sounds does a guitarist really use? Even if you play in a cover band with a wide range of material you only need a certain number of distinct sounds. I've known guys who can stomp on a ProCo Rat and play all night without ever changing settings-and rock da house. We may want our sounds to go from Metallica to Stevie Ray to Satriani but then a lot of that has to do with the different guitars in use and a LOT to do with individual talent (I'd love to sound like SRV but even if I dial his tone in perfect in AT2 my guitar still won't sound like that worn out strat and I sure as hell don't have a fraction of the talent needed to play like SRV). I guess what I'm saying is does the average player really need 50 amp sims and 50 Cab sims etc? I can see a studio needing that wide range to cover all their client's needs but......
So AT2 is really that far advanced from AT1? I'd love to give it a go but I hate installing demos on my music computer and for the upgrade price I'd rather buy hardware.
- KVRAF
- 19156 posts since 13 Feb, 2003 from Vancouver, Canada
you seem to be in a similar space as me: you prefer hardware (I can't imagine sacrificing all that CPU power too!), I doubt you'd be swayed by AT2. And that's a great point you make: I've often laughed at myself because I use almost exclusively 2-3 models on the POD! "Black Panel" for clean, the Soldano for dirty, and the Mesa for saturated. Nothing else seems to take as well.
So do I really need 20,000 amp models? Probably not! Best save my money and put them towards better speakers, more RAM, faster MoBo...
So do I really need 20,000 amp models? Probably not! Best save my money and put them towards better speakers, more RAM, faster MoBo...
-
- KVRAF
- 4222 posts since 23 Feb, 2004 from Tucson Arizona USA
Stevie pretty just plugged his Strat directly into his Twin, turned the gain all the way up, and played.Teksonik wrote:(I'd love to sound like SRV but even if I dial his tone in perfect in AT2 my guitar still won't sound like that worn out strat
The average player wants one or two. The trouble is, two average players tend to want a *different* one or two.I guess what I'm saying is does the average player really need 50 amp sims and 50 Cab sims etc?
- KVRAF
- 19156 posts since 13 Feb, 2003 from Vancouver, Canada
Sorry, James. Stevie's sound is much more complicated than that!james0tucson wrote:Stevie pretty just plugged his Strat directly into his Twin, turned the gain all the way up, and played.Teksonik wrote:(I'd love to sound like SRV but even if I dial his tone in perfect in AT2 my guitar still won't sound like that worn out strat
The average player wants one or two. The trouble is, two average players tend to want a *different* one or two.I guess what I'm saying is does the average player really need 50 amp sims and 50 Cab sims etc?


