Crazy Idea . . . .
-
- KVRer
- 17 posts since 15 Feb, 2006
okk i just had a crazy idea(could be genius), i opened up my receptor and noticed that it had a uATX mobo in it and i was wondering could i take that out(i know that i've voided my warranty) and install a different uATX mobo with higher specs? like being able to take a C2D E6600 and more than 2 gb of memory?
-
- KVRer
- Topic Starter
- 17 posts since 15 Feb, 2006
i quess it is crazy then
-
- KVRer
- Topic Starter
- 17 posts since 15 Feb, 2006
yeah, technically there should be no reason why i cant do this (physically), but I'm thinking the the Receptor os doesn't support multi core cpu's, cant address more than 2GB of ram, or is coded to run specifically on the motherboard\chipset that it came with . . . i think i should goto to muse directly with this. i afraid they were just going to ignore me, but I'd probably get a better answer from them anyway . . .
-
- KVRist
- 69 posts since 9 Jan, 2006
I had the same idea when I first got my receptor.
I havent thought about it for a while now, but I'm sure there are some nice new motherboard candidates out there. Let me/us know if you find any.
--
Olle Gustafsson
I havent thought about it for a while now, but I'm sure there are some nice new motherboard candidates out there. Let me/us know if you find any.
--
Olle Gustafsson
-
- KVRer
- Topic Starter
- 17 posts since 15 Feb, 2006
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.a ... 6813186112 = lower end
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.a ... 6813121080 = Higher end
EDIT
: i read some of your info about the motherboard, and after researching i found that the A8V-VM was the only opyion also
i was wishing that i could throw in an Intel board but i guess not

EDIT
into further reading of your blog, it seem as though different chipsets, embedded hardware on the mobo can be supported by adding a linux kernel driver for it, am i correct?
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.a ... 6813121080 = Higher end
EDIT
: i read some of your info about the motherboard, and after researching i found that the A8V-VM was the only opyion also
i was wishing that i could throw in an Intel board but i guess not
EDIT
into further reading of your blog, it seem as though different chipsets, embedded hardware on the mobo can be supported by adding a linux kernel driver for it, am i correct?
-
- KVRist
- 69 posts since 9 Jan, 2006
Yes, in theory you could use whatever AMD board you want. But, since Muse haven't made the kernel source avalible (or have they?), you can't compile any drivers.djbassay2k5 wrote:into further reading of your blog, it seem as though different chipsets, embedded hardware on the mobo can be supported by adding a linux kernel driver for it, am i correct?
--
Olle Gustafsson
-
- KVRer
- Topic Starter
- 17 posts since 15 Feb, 2006
oook i think i get it, even if i have access to the linux chipsets\ etc. kernels, i cant use them because i dont have the kernel\source code for the receptor OS. right?
lol\omg that sucks:bang:. well it wont make any difference if i had the source code anyway because i don't know the first about software development
i wonder if Muse is planing making the Receptor OS like FX-max. if so, then my dreams would have come true. fx max is "alright" but it doesnt have uniwire 1.1
lol\omg that sucks:bang:. well it wont make any difference if i had the source code anyway because i don't know the first about software development
i wonder if Muse is planing making the Receptor OS like FX-max. if so, then my dreams would have come true. fx max is "alright" but it doesnt have uniwire 1.1
-
- KVRist
- 96 posts since 2 May, 2004 from USA
[quote="djbassay2k5"]oook i think i get it, even if i have access to the linux chipsets\ etc. kernels, i cant use them because i dont have the kernel\source code for the receptor OS. right?
lol\omg that sucks:bang:. well it wont make any difference if i had the source code anyway because i don't know the first about software development
i wonder if Muse is planing making the Receptor OS like FX-max. if so, then my dreams would have come true. fx max is "alright" but it doesnt have uniwire 1.1[/quote]
you guys are stressing too hard.
the sources are there on the ftp site.
I posted the links a while back (forget which), on a idea that that me and OGG where trippin on.
just extract the "rpm" while inside /, dont forget "linux-headers" and "gcc".
and copy your .config file before you kill the original
remember....this IS source so build your kernels with the NEW motherboards you have.....use "cat" against "/proc" to find out your exact chipset types ignore those books that came with your motherboard and graphics cards
have fun.
lol\omg that sucks:bang:. well it wont make any difference if i had the source code anyway because i don't know the first about software development
i wonder if Muse is planing making the Receptor OS like FX-max. if so, then my dreams would have come true. fx max is "alright" but it doesnt have uniwire 1.1[/quote]
you guys are stressing too hard.
the sources are there on the ftp site.
I posted the links a while back (forget which), on a idea that that me and OGG where trippin on.
just extract the "rpm" while inside /, dont forget "linux-headers" and "gcc".
and copy your .config file before you kill the original
remember....this IS source so build your kernels with the NEW motherboards you have.....use "cat" against "/proc" to find out your exact chipset types ignore those books that came with your motherboard and graphics cards
have fun.
myspace.com/bekenone
-
- KVRer
- Topic Starter
- 17 posts since 15 Feb, 2006
lol like i said, i dont know the first about this level of computer technology
-
- KVRAF
- 6323 posts since 30 Dec, 2004 from London uk
It would take a lot of work to get receptor os working on a different mobo. How are the LCD display and front panel switches and midi/audio connected? Is the source code available to drive that? Not a 5 minute conversion. Im not sure Muse would even like this discussion.
-
- KVRist
- 69 posts since 9 Jan, 2006
The LCD is connected via a standard serial port and is as far as I can tell driven by Muse's GUI application. So as long the kernel have serial port supported it should work. The audiocard (both audio and midi) is a specially made PCI audiocard but it uses generic ALSA drivers (this is an educated guess, or perhaps an uneducated one =D).UltraJv wrote:How are the LCD display and front panel switches and midi/audio connected? Is the source code available to drive that?
So to answer the second question above, no, the source is not avalible to drive that since it's driven by Muse's VST host application (still guessing).
--
Olle Gustafsson
-
- KVRer
- 21 posts since 26 Aug, 2006 from Melbourne
I've been looking at the kernel & ALSA sources posted here. If they compile OK, maybe a board like the ASUS P5B-VM-DO will suit. The Core Duo processors should suit the Receptor well since they're used in laptops and the Mac Mini. I'm in Australia and my Receptor's out of warranty so this is my best option.
I'm also looking at buying a Wacom PL-510 which has linux drivers for 2.4 and 2.6 kernels. It'd be brilliant to be able to manipulate plugins directly, almost like two dimensional hardware.
I'm also looking at buying a Wacom PL-510 which has linux drivers for 2.4 and 2.6 kernels. It'd be brilliant to be able to manipulate plugins directly, almost like two dimensional hardware.
