Is this configuration allowed ? (...see picture inside)

[Krakatau]

Sorry for the roughness...





In the particular case, i have a ZOOM 9200 hardware reverb unit that i expect to include in the receptor's signal routing, as it would be an aditionnal single instance of a virtual effect

Effect that could eventually be added in your sequencer as a send/return one via uniwire fx plug-in, if needed...

Does it make sense ?

[Hybernation]

I'm pretty sure it won't work. You can route OTHER audio signals into Receptor and treat them with VST FX running in the receptor (and receive the output via Ethernet).

But in your picture, I believe you would be creating the classic feedback loop.

[Krakatau]

I'm pretty sure it won't work. You can route OTHER audio signals into Receptor and treat them with VST FX running in the receptor (and receive the output via Ethernet).

But in your picture, I believe you would be creating the classic feedback loop.

That's what i thought, but considering it probably depends entirely on software implementation, this maybe could be added in a whislist for a future update ?

[gregh1]

I think it is possible, as long as you route channels to outputs properly - you'd use the "Output Assignments" dialog to route everything appropriately, being sure to avoid the feedback loop.

Also, there would be double the latency - once going out to the external device, and again coming back in. This should be OK for delay and reverb effects, but maybe not for flanging or phasing. Setting Receptor to 48kHz and 64 byte buffers would minimize this.

[Krakatau]

Thanks for the info

At the time i'd mainly use for reverbs i don't think latency would a noticeable problem most of the time...