Can SS sounds be used in ST?
-
- KVRist
- 57 posts since 7 Dec, 2005
Hi, there,
I have both SS and ST but would like to consolidate. Is it possible to use SS Sounds in ST so that I could use ST as the single interface for both?
If so, would there be any limitations to using them in ST?
Thanks so much ,
- A
I have both SS and ST but would like to consolidate. Is it possible to use SS Sounds in ST so that I could use ST as the single interface for both?
If so, would there be any limitations to using them in ST?
Thanks so much ,
- A
-
- Skunk Mod
- 21249 posts since 10 Jun, 2004 from Pony Pasture
That's how I do it. I just moved the sample directory over so it would be another subdirectory off the ST samples root, and bingo. It's a lot to scroll through but that's a cost I'm willing to pay.
Only limitation I can think of is that if you save a patch, it'll be usable only in ST, not in SS. Not much of a limitation really but that's all I could come up with.
Only limitation I can think of is that if you save a patch, it'll be usable only in ST, not in SS. Not much of a limitation really but that's all I could come up with.
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 57 posts since 7 Dec, 2005
Cool.
It's better efficiency-wise, I think, to scroll through a lot rather than loading multiple gui's and not being as good as you can be in one.
I'm actually thinking about converting other applicable libs to ST just to get rid of the overhead of loading and learning them, too.
Thank you very much,
- A
It's better efficiency-wise, I think, to scroll through a lot rather than loading multiple gui's and not being as good as you can be in one.
I'm actually thinking about converting other applicable libs to ST just to get rid of the overhead of loading and learning them, too.
Thank you very much,
- A
-
harmony gardens harmony gardens https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=12815
- KVRian
- 830 posts since 19 Feb, 2004 from Richland Center, Wisconsin
Besides the convenience of having both sound sets in one GUI, you have the added benefit of being able to use sounds from either set to create your own combinations.
-
- KVRAF
- 10366 posts since 2 Sep, 2003 from Surrey, UK
As far as I can tell, the only disadvantage is that ST25 will take slightly longer to open and to _Relist_ the library, as it is that much bigger.
But as everyone has said you get all the sounds in one place and you can mix and match them to your heart's content, and ST25 has more comprehensive features that SS2.1
PS Don't forget to move/copy your SS2 combi presets so that ST25 can see them.
e.g. from C:\Program Files\IK Multimedia\Sonik Synth 2\Presets
to C:\Program Files\IK Multimedia\SampleTank 2.5\Presets\SS2.
HTH
But as everyone has said you get all the sounds in one place and you can mix and match them to your heart's content, and ST25 has more comprehensive features that SS2.1
PS Don't forget to move/copy your SS2 combi presets so that ST25 can see them.
e.g. from C:\Program Files\IK Multimedia\Sonik Synth 2\Presets
to C:\Program Files\IK Multimedia\SampleTank 2.5\Presets\SS2.
HTH
-
- Skunk Mod
- 21249 posts since 10 Jun, 2004 from Pony Pasture
D'oh, I noticed that early on. Ought to have remembered. A minor annoyance merely but it's there.DarkStar wrote:As far as I can tell, the only disadvantage is that ST25 will take slightly longer to open and to _Relist_ the library, as it is that much bigger.
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 57 posts since 7 Dec, 2005
Okay,
I guess I was concerned at any sort of synth-manipulation things that the SS interface might have that ST lacks.
If it's not going to do anything LESS, then it's almost a no brainer. I love the blue SS interface, though...too bad ST isn't skinnable (or at least colorable)...
I guess I was concerned at any sort of synth-manipulation things that the SS interface might have that ST lacks.
If it's not going to do anything LESS, then it's almost a no brainer. I love the blue SS interface, though...too bad ST isn't skinnable (or at least colorable)...
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 57 posts since 7 Dec, 2005
Cool!
Thanks, Meffy!
Thanks, Meffy!
-
- KVRAF
- 10366 posts since 2 Sep, 2003 from Surrey, UK
... and some of us have been blue (or gold) for a year or two: 

Big pic:
http://img255.imageshack.us/img255/7562/st25bluewn9.png

Big pic:
http://img255.imageshack.us/img255/7562/st25bluewn9.png
-
- KVRAF
- 9523 posts since 6 Oct, 2004
There are some corners where annoying gradients are too dark and obscure text, and are not affected by colour...nice for video games, but hey...guess what?DarkStar wrote:... and some of us have been blue (or gold) for a year or two:
Big pic:
http://img255.imageshack.us/img255/7562/st25bluewn9.png
-
- KVRian
- 1157 posts since 1 Apr, 2003 from Good old Germany
Yeah so many combinations possibleharmony gardens wrote:Besides the convenience of having both sound sets in one GUI, you have the added benefit of being able to use sounds from either set to create your own combinations.
1800 sounds in ST2.5 and 5600 sounds in SS2 that makes 7400!
So the number of possibilities of 2 patches combined to 1 sound is:
(7400 * 7399) / 2 = 27376300
tele
Listen to me at soundcklick:
www.soundclick.com/wewritesongs
www.soundclick.com/wewritesongs
-
- KVRAF
- 1703 posts since 19 Apr, 2003 from Copenhagen, Denmark
You can tell ST under preferences not to relist every time you open it.Meffy wrote:D'oh, I noticed that early on. Ought to have remembered. A minor annoyance merely but it's there.DarkStar wrote:As far as I can tell, the only disadvantage is that ST25 will take slightly longer to open and to _Relist_ the library, as it is that much bigger.
It will open faster then.
And if you need to relist after a new made sound there is a button to the right for relist(ing).

___The Jepptunes___
"Accept All the Good"
Sound design for SQ8L and Alchemy
"Accept All the Good"
Sound design for SQ8L and Alchemy
