Poll: Most Wanted New MU.LAB Feature
-
- KVRAF
- 1645 posts since 24 May, 2002
-
deleted deleted https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=1
DELETED
-
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 1645 posts since 24 May, 2002
Yes, i understand that it may not be easy to just choose one feature.
But think like this: from all features listed, which one do you want MOST!
Choose that one.
This way, we'll be able to make a top 3 of most wanted features.
(if enough people vote)
From time to time, when the most wanted features are there, a new similar poll will be done to see which feature you want most then.
Enjoy choosing
But think like this: from all features listed, which one do you want MOST!
Choose that one.
This way, we'll be able to make a top 3 of most wanted features.
(if enough people vote)
From time to time, when the most wanted features are there, a new similar poll will be done to see which feature you want most then.
Enjoy choosing
-
- KVRAF
- 10170 posts since 2 Jan, 2005 from somewhere in the woods
I'd like to have a wavelab like in Computermuzys with 24 bit support most ... loopcomposer, rewire and multicore are most-wanted from the list.
Thanks for asking!
c
Thanks for asking!
c
"It dreamed itself along"
-
- Banned
- 897 posts since 8 Jan, 2005 from Detroit
rewire is as good as adding any or all of the above until its native. there are many juicy choices, however i had to vote for rewire. the rest can wait i think. ill rewire to muzys! 
bravo to whats there already!
bravo to whats there already!
-
- KVRer
- 20 posts since 9 Jul, 2003
Hey Jo!
I have posted entry #3 to the Natalie Weese production blog, and there includes a very favorable review of MuLab's current usability status in addition to a list of fairly minor feature requests.
I would note that my requests relate to fundamental workflow, as opposed to adding new and exciting features to MuLab.
Right now, the basic capabilities are quite solid, but I would definitely address a few rough edges that impede workflow before going too far with additional features. JMHO.
To put it another way, the good news is, I am not seeing much in the way of bugs OR a lack of features. It's more about making what's already there more fun and intuitive to use.
Please check it out at www.natalieweese.com
Dave
I have posted entry #3 to the Natalie Weese production blog, and there includes a very favorable review of MuLab's current usability status in addition to a list of fairly minor feature requests.
I would note that my requests relate to fundamental workflow, as opposed to adding new and exciting features to MuLab.
Right now, the basic capabilities are quite solid, but I would definitely address a few rough edges that impede workflow before going too far with additional features. JMHO.
To put it another way, the good news is, I am not seeing much in the way of bugs OR a lack of features. It's more about making what's already there more fun and intuitive to use.
Please check it out at www.natalieweese.com
Dave
-
- Banned
- 22457 posts since 5 Sep, 2001
[DELETED]
-
- KVRer
- 20 posts since 9 Jul, 2003
All these are desirable, although I could care less about rewire...
-
- KVRian
- 951 posts since 14 Apr, 2004 from Maryland, USA
I read your entry. Lots of good stuff in there.davidweese wrote:To put it another way, the good news is, I am not seeing much in the way of bugs OR a lack of features. It's more about making what's already there more fun and intuitive to use.
Please check it out at www.natalieweese.com
DaveL
You can twist perceptions, reality won't budge.
-- Rush Show Don't Tell
-- Rush Show Don't Tell
-
- KVRAF
- 7412 posts since 8 Feb, 2003 from London, UK
Nice requests.davidweese wrote:I have posted entry #3 to the Natalie Weese production blog, and there includes a very favorable review of MuLab's current usability status in addition to a list of fairly minor feature requests.
I take it you don't use the modular plugin area at all? (Hit F3) Go own, throw away even more of the constraints!
You sort of mentioned punch in for vocal takes. Good call and a requested feature not on the list above. I also like the idea of "mix down to single part and replace selection" or whatever it would be called - yeah, "consolidate" is shorter...
You can change a clip routing to null by setting it to a plugin and then deleting that plugin... Not ideal... Your idea sounds better, I'll remember it!
-
- KVRist
- 47 posts since 1 May, 2006 from Stockholm, Sweden
I'm a little bit surprised that no one but me wants drag and drop support...?
Or is it just me bouncing tracks and using loops from time to time?
Or is it just me bouncing tracks and using loops from time to time?
-
- KVRist
- 146 posts since 28 May, 2005 from Brisbane, Australia
Oh, I would love that! I just prefer an integrated sampler more.mickeh wrote:I'm a little bit surprised that no one but me wants drag and drop support...?
Or is it just me bouncing tracks and using loops from time to time?
iMac (21.5-inch, Late 2009), 3.06 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo, 8 GB RAM, OSX 10.12.6
-
- KVRAF
- 7412 posts since 8 Feb, 2003 from London, UK
Yeah, there's a fair few on there... But I went for self-consistency... (Enhanced MIDI In)