What sample rate do your run your host at?
-
- KVRian
- 654 posts since 13 Jan, 2007 from NJ, USA
- KVRist
- 144 posts since 23 Apr, 2006 from London, England
sb.net wrote:I learned from my mistakes, and don't put fish as an option.
-
- KVRAF
- 13444 posts since 14 Nov, 2000 from Hannover / Germany
44.1 for me. Still the most convenient format and not taxing the CPU as much as really high samplerates.
There are 3 kinds of people:
Those who can do maths and those who can't.
Those who can do maths and those who can't.
-
- KVRian
- 1334 posts since 5 May, 2004 from fighting the kVr disInfo
Sascha Franck wrote:44.1 for me. Still the most convenient format and not taxing the CPU as much as really high samplerates.
is there an echo in here
i am me and i am free...k thx bai
- KVRAF
- 4798 posts since 14 Jun, 2004 from USA
-
- KVRAF
- 11839 posts since 23 Nov, 2004 from west of east
Discussions on sample rates are like all the other "best" threads -- the only people who know the differences are those who spend their time worrying about them. 
We escape the trap of our own subjectivity by
perceiving neither black nor white but shades of grey
perceiving neither black nor white but shades of grey
- Rad Grandad
- 38041 posts since 6 Sep, 2003 from Downeast Maine
44.1 
The highest form of knowledge is empathy, for it requires us to suspend our egos and live in another's world. It requires profound, purpose‐larger‐than‐the‐self kind of understanding.
-
- KVRAF
- 1718 posts since 3 Sep, 2003
Actually have to disagree with that. Higher sample rates can improve sound quality quite audibly when you are dealing with soft synths and effects.eduardo_b wrote:Discussions on sample rates are like all the other "best" threads -- the only people who know the differences are those who spend their time worrying about them.
It is much more important than say, 32 vs 64 bits, or the choice of host.
-
- KVRAF
- 3139 posts since 6 Sep, 2002 from United Kingdom & Opinions Will Travel :O)
umd wrote:Who can present me a situation where there's an audible difference between 48khz/24bit and 96khz/bit (preferably using freeware plugins)? Just for curiosity.
Just pitch it up n down a lot, the 96 will be better
-
- KVRAF
- 3139 posts since 6 Sep, 2002 from United Kingdom & Opinions Will Travel :O)
I use 44.1 or 48 the bulk of the time - I can operate more stuff that way
But for sample pitching, noise reduction etc, I go to 96 (and sometimes even higher
) but not lately, mainly sticking to the 44 or 48. 
